Development of Tadris Al-'Arabiyyah Al-Mukatssaf (TAM) Textbook, Based on Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL)

Moh Sholeh Afyuddin; Maziyyatul Muslimah; Muhammad Nur  Kholis; Rina Dian  Rahmawati

doi:10.30762/asalibuna.v7i01.1084

Authors

Moh Sholeh Afyuddin Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri
Maziyyatul Muslimah Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri
Muhammad Nur Kholis UIN Raden Mas Said Surakarta
Rina Dian Rahmawati Universitas Wahab Chasbullah Jombang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/asalibuna.v7i01.1084

Keywords:

Tadris al-‘Arabiyyah al-Mukatssaf (TAM), Bahasa Arab Intensif, Pengembangan Buku Ajar Bahasa Arab, Contextual Teaching and Learning (CTL), Pendekatan Kontekstual

Abstract

Tadris al-'Arabiyyah al-Mukatssaf (TAM) is a course given to semester 1 students of Arabic Language Education, Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kediri. This course aims to prepare new students with standard Arabic language skills so they will be able to learn Arabic language courses in the next semester easily. The development of this textbook is based on contextual teaching and learning (CTL) because CTL is a student-oriented approach which can lead students to become more active and can generate self-directed in learning. The textbook development uses the ADDIE procedure with 5 development steps and ends with an experimental test to reveal the effectiveness. This research produced a textbook Tadris al-'Arabiyyah al-Mukatssaf based on Contextual Teaching and Learning with its seven principles, which are: constructivism, inquiry, questioning, learning community, modeling, reflection and authentic assessment. This textbook contains 21 dars (units). Each dars (unit) contains 4 material: 1) ta'bir al-shuurah, 2) hiwar, 3) nash qiraah, and 4) qawaid. In hiwar, nash qiraah and qawaid are equipped with practice questions and a list of mufrodat and Arabic expressions. The results of the effectiveness test with the pre-test and post-test designs revealed that the average post-test score was at 65.33, higher than the pre-test average score at 56.35. Total T count of 9.90 is higher than T table of 1.98 which means that Ha is accepted and Ho is rejected. With a Pearson correlation value of 0.64 greater than 0.05, the use of books proved to be effective.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullah, Abdulhamid, and Nasheer Abdullah Al Gholy. 1991. “Usus I’daad Al-Kutub Al-Ta’liimiyah Li Ghoiri Al-Nathiqiina Bi Al-Arabiyah.”

Alfian. 2019. “Contextual Teaching and Learning Approach (CTL) in English Teaching.” Journal Eduscience 4 (2): 58–66. https://ejurnal.esaunggul.ac.id/index.php/EDU/article/view/2732.

Arifudin. 2020. “Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Ditinjau Dari Asal Sekolah Mahasiswa (Studi Kasus Terhadap Mahasiswa Prodi PAI).” An-Nizom 5 (3): 139–48. https://ejournal.iainbengkulu.ac.id/index.php/annizom/article/download/3891/2836.

Branch, Robert Maribe. 2009. Instructional Design: The ADDIE Approach. New York: Springer ScienceþBusiness Media. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09506-6.

Faijah. 2015. “Problematika Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Siswa Yang Berlatar Belakang SD Pada MTS Muslimat NU Palangka Raya Tahun Ajaran 2015/2016.” Institut Agama Islam Negeri Palangka Raya. http://digilib.iain-palangkaraya.ac.id/id/eprint/144.

Hadidi, Ali. 1967. Musykilah Ta’lim Al-Lughah Al-’Arabiyyah Li Ghairi Al-’Arab. Dar al-Katib al-’Arabi.

Hernawan, Asep Herry, Permasih, and Laksmi Dewi. 2008. “Panduan Pengembangan Bahan Ajar.” Depdiknas Jakarta, 1–13. http://file.upi.edu/Direktori/FIP/JUR._KURIKULUM_DAN_TEK._PENDIDIKAN/194601291981012-PERMASIH/PENGEMBANGAN_BAHAN_AJAR.pdf.

Huang, Yu-Chia. 2021. “Comparison and Contrast of Piaget and Vygotsky’s Theories.” Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Humanities and Social Science Research (ICHSSR 2021) 554 (Ichssr): 28–32. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210519.007.

Imam Suprayogo. 2015. “Bahasa Arab Dan Kajian Islam Di Perguruan Tinggi.” 2015. https://uin-malang.ac.id/r/150801/bahasa-arab-dan-kajian-islam-di-perguruan-tinggi.html.

Majid, Abdul, and Chaerul Rochman. 2014. Pendekatan Ilmiah Dalam Impelementasi Kurikulum 2013. Edited by Engkus Kuswandi. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muslich, Mansur. 2009. KTSP Pembelajaran Berbasis Kompetensi Dan Kontekstual. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Nasution, Sahkholid. 2015. Pemikiran Nahwu Syauqi Dhayf. Solusi Alternatif Mengatasi Problematika Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab. Malang: Misykat Indonesia.

Pranowo. 2015. Teori Belajar Bahasa Untuk Guru Bahasa Dan Mahasiswa Jurusan Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Sanjaya, Wina. 2006. Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Sehra, Anisah Satus. 2022. “Problematika Latar Belakang Pendidikan Mahasiswa Dan Implikasinya Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Intensif.” El-Tsaqafah : Jurnal Jurusan PBA 20 (2): 209–24. https://doi.org/10.20414/tsaqafah.v20i2.3827.

Suardipa, I Putu. 2020. “Sosiocultural-Revolution Ala Vygotsky Dalam Konteks Pembelajaran.” Widaya Kumara Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini 1.

Thuaimah, Rushdi Ahmad. 1985. Dalil Amal Fi I’dad Al-Mawaad Al-Ta’limiyyah Li Baramij Ta’lim Al-’Arabiyyah. Makkah al-Mukarromah: Ma’had al-Lughah al-’Arabiyyah Bi Jamiah Ummu al-Quraa.

Trianto. 2012. Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Progresif: Konsep, Landasan, Dan Implementasinya Pada Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan (KTSP). 5th ed. Jakarta: Kencana Perdana Media Group.

Wahida, Besse. 2017. “PROBLEMATIKA PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA ARAB (Studi Kasus Terhadap Problematika Metodologis Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Di IAIN Pontianak).” Jurnal Al-Astar STAI Mempawah 7 (1): 43–64.