Designing a Research-Oriented Curriculum in Islamic Secondary Education: An Analysis of Curriculum Development Components in Madrasah

Hawwin Muzakki; Moh. Arif; Manavavee Mamah; Muh. Ibnu Sholeh

doi:10.30762/edudeena.v10i1.8439

Authors

Hawwin Muzakki Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia
Moh. Arif Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia
Manavavee Mamah Yala Rajabhat University, Thailand
Muh. Ibnu Sholeh Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam (STAI) KH. Muhammad Ali Shodiq Tulungagung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/edudeena.v10i1.8439

Keywords:

curriculum development, curriculum research, educational innovation, madrasah, scientific studies

Abstract

This research discusses the establishment and implementation of a research curriculum in Islamic secondary education utilizing MAN 2 Tulungagung as a research-oriented madrasah model. The study investigates four major questions: (1) how the curriculum objectives integrate scientific inquiry and Islamic values; (2) how the content of research is organized and presented; (3) how instructional methods support the development of research skills; and (4) how research learning outcomes are evaluated and enhanced by evaluation mechanisms. Data were collected through a qualitative case study comprising in-depth interviews with school administrators, research mentors, and curriculum coordinators; document analysis; classroom observations; and focus group discussions. The data were assessed using a curriculum development framework based on Tyler’s model, focusing on the consistency of objectives, learning experiences, content organization, and evaluation. The findings show that the research curriculum is intended as an integral and value-based structure. Curriculum objectives combine scientific rigor and Islamic ethical formation; content provides a balance between theoretical research knowledge and applied inquiry; instructional techniques are student-centered and inquiry-based; evaluation includes thorough formative and summative assessments. This integrative methodology promotes students’ research literacy, critical thinking, and moral responsibility. Theoretically, this study demonstrates how Islamic secondary education can create a space for research-based learning in a faith-based framework. In practice, this study provides a curriculum model that madrasahs can replicate to strengthen research culture and global academic competitiveness while maintaining religious identity. The concept also represents an innovation in curriculum administration, particularly in integrating research mentoring, student differentiation, and institutional evaluation mechanisms.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdillah, M. I., Hunaida, W. L., & Muqit, A. (2025). Digitalization of islamic education learning through interactive educational games. Edudeena : Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 9(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.30762/edudeena.v9i1.4230

al Faruqi, I. R. (1989). Islamization of knowledge: General principles and work plan (2nd ed.). International Institute of Islamic Thought.

Alam, A., & Mohanty, A. (2024). Integrated constructive robotics in education (ICRE) model: A paradigmatic framework for transformative learning in educational ecosystem. Cogent Education, 11(1), 2324487. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2324487

Al-Attas, M. N. (1991). The concept of education in islam: A framework for an Islamic philosophy of education. International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization.

As’ad, A., Al-mufti, A. yusron, & Natsir, M. (2021). Development of the madrasah diniyah takmiliyah curriculum model (LP ma’arif, jepara regency) in the industry 4.0 era. Edudeena : Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 5(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.30762/ed.v5i1.3056

Azra, A. (2014). Pendidikan Islam: Tradisi dan modernisasi di tengah tantangan milenium III. Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Balemen, N., & Keskin, M. Ö. (2018). The effectiveness of project-based learning on science education: A meta-analysis search. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching, 5(4), 849–865. http://iojet.org/index.php/IOJET/article/view/452/297

Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2020). Research-based character education. Journal of Character Education, 16(1), 1–22. https://doi.org.doi/10.1177/0002716203260082

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education (UK).

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5(1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102

Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2006). Aligning assessment with long-term learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(4), 399–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930600679050

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Brew, A. (2013). Understanding the scope of undergraduate research: A framework for curricular and pedagogical decision-making. Higher Education, 66(5), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-013-9624-x

Bruner, J. S. (2009). The process of education. Harvard University Press. Castells, M. (2011). The rise of the network society. John Wiley & Sons.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications, Incorporated.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th (ed.)). Sage Publications.

Ferngren, G. B. (2022). Science and religion. In The Routledge History of American Science. Routledge.

Freeman, R. E., & Reed, D. L. (1983). Stockholders and stakeholders: A new perspective on corporate governance. California Management Review, 25(3), 88–106. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165018

Fullan, M. (2015). The new meaning of educational change (5th ed.). Teachers College Press. Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.

Hasanah, E. S. (2025). Embedding Qur’anic values into student-centered learning: a framework for character education in contemporary classrooms. International Journal of Educational Narratives, 3(6), 489–495. https://doi.org/10.70177/ijen.v3i6.2934

Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. Higher Education Academy York.

Hefner, R. (2018). Islamic schools, social movements, and democracy in Indonesia. In R. W. Hefner (Ed.), Making Modern Muslims: The Politics of Islamic Education in Southeast Asia (pp. 55–105). University of Hawaii Press.

Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A response to kirschner, sweller, and clark. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520701263368

Hoidn, S. (2017). Constructivist foundations and common design principles of student-centered learning environments. In S. Hoidn (Ed.), Student-Centered Learning Environments in Higher Education Classrooms (pp. 23–103). Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-94941-0_2

Kholilah, N., & Taubah, M. (2026). Integrating Qur’anic and prophetic values into Islamic education curriculum development in the age of disruption. Al-Fahmu: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, 5(1), 250–265. https://doi.org/10.58363/alfahmu.v5i1.770

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.

Lim, W. M. (2025). What is qualitative research? An overview and guidelines. Australasian Marketing Journal, 33(2), 199–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications. McNeil, J. D. (1977). Curriculum: A comprehensive introduction. Little, Brown.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook and the coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE. https://www.metodos.work/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Qualitative-Data-Analysis.pdf

Muhaimin, M. (2001). Paradigma pendidikan islam: Upaya mengefektifkan pendidikan agama Islam di sekolah. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Mulyasa, E. (2006). Kurikulum yang disempurnakan. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nasr, S. H. (1996). Religion and the order of nature. Oxford University Press.

Ornstein, A. C., & Hunkins, F. P. (2018). Curriculum: Foundations, principles, and issues. Pearson. https://dl.icdst.org/pdfs/files4/b5abcd5b146b48f4fd20f1f3c8da710f.pdf

Panadero, E., Brown, G. B., & Strijbos, J. W. (2016). The future of student self-assessment: A review of known unknowns and potential directions. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 803–830. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-015-9350-2

Pedaste, M., Mäeots, M., Siiman, L. A., de Jong, T., van Riesen, S. A. N., Kamp, E. T., Manoli, C. C., Zacharia, Z. C., & Tsourlidaki, E. (2015). Phases of inquiry-based learning: Definitions and the inquiry cycle. Educational Research Review, 14, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.003

Piaget, J. (2003). The psychology of intelligence. Routledge.

Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (2008). The psychology of the child. Basic books.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/J.2168-9830.2004.TB00809.X

Qadri, S. S., Hussin, N. S., & Dar, M. M. (2024). Countering extremism through Islamic education: Curriculum and pedagogical approaches. Journal on Islamic Studies, 1(1), 74–89. https://doi.org/10.35335/R182S939

Rijal, A. S., Husna, M. A., Kholiluddin, T., & Subkan, M. A. (2025). Islamic education as an ethical mechanism in responding to social diversity: A contextual analysis of indonesia and malaysia. Edudeena : Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 9(2), 135–146. https://doi.org/10.30762/edudeena.v9i2.7568

Shepard, L. A. (2000). The role of assessment in a learning culture. Educational Researcher, 29(7), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X029007004

Thomas, J. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Autodesk Foundation.

Thoyib, M. (2021). Manajemen madrasah riset: Kajian teoritis dan implementatif menuju madrasah unggul dan inovatif di indonesia. CV Markumi.

Tyler, R. W. (2010). Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. University of Chicago Press. UNESCO. (2017). Education for sustainable development goals: Learning objectives. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://doi.org/10.54675/CGBA9153

Vygotsky, L. . (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-

Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman (eds.)). Harvard University Press. 10.2307/j.ctvjf9vz4

Wals, A. E. J., & Jickling, B. (2002). “Sustainability” in higher education: From doublethink and newspeak to critical thinking and meaningful learning. Higher Education Policy, 15(2), 121–131. http://doi.org/10.1108/14676370210434688

Wulandari, D., Amirudin, I. L., Kamila, A. S., & Fathir, M. R. M. A. (2025). Quality assurance challenges in indonesian islamic higher education. Edudeena : Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 9(2), 192–206. https://doi.org/10.30762/edudeena.v9i2.7097

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.

Yulianto, S. F., Zuroidah, N., & Fadhliyah, N. (2025). Transformative islamic education in the perspective of kuntowijoyo’s prophetic social sciences in the society 5.0 era. Edudeena : Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 9(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.30762/edudeena.v9i2.7320