Generative AI, Cognitive Offloading, and Ability Beliefs: A Case Study from an Islamic Secondary School in South Kalimantan, Indonesia
Keywords:
generative AI, cognitive offloading, implicit theories of ability, reflective practice, teacher feedbackAbstract
This study examines how six students and three teachers in one private Islamic senior secondary school in South Kalimantan, Indonesia (coded SMAI-X), described generative AI use, beliefs about the changeability of ability, and classroom feedback practice, against a contested evidence base on both AI-related cognitive offloading and growth-mindset interventions. Using a qualitative multiple-case design, data were collected through semi-structured interviews, student process journals, AI interaction logs, and weekly reflection entries, and analyzed through within-case profiling, boundary-explicit thematic coding, and cross-case comparison. Three patterns emerged: several students treated a functioning AI-generated output as sufficient for task closure without independent verification; some students used explicit fixed-ability language when accounting for specific difficulties; and teachers' feedback typically named a shortcoming without an actionable next step, within a routine offering limited revision opportunity. These patterns were synthesized into a hypothesized, non-causal process model. Islamic epistemological commitments to effortful knowledge-seeking (ijtihad) are used as a conceptual lens for interpreting these patterns, positioning Islamic education as a theoretical contribution of the study rather than only its research setting. Findings are bounded to a small number of cases in one classroom and should not be generalized; the cross-sectional design does not support causal inference, and reliance on self-report raises the possibility of social desirability effects. Longitudinal or experimental designs are needed to test the proposed model's directionality, and equity-focused attention to feedback structure and device access is recommended for similar classroom contexts.
Downloads
References
Ariyani, R., Nasril, N., Munip, A., Zh, M. H. R., Maspan, M., Darni, D., & At Thaariq, Z. Z. (2026). Digital leadership and teacher professionalism in Islamic schools: A mediation model of student digital literacy. Edudeena: Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 10(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.30762/edudeena.v10i1.8275
Baidarus, & Fithri, R. (2025). Implementation of growth mindset in Islamic education and its impact on character development of students at MTs. Muhammadiyah Pekanbaru. POTENSIA: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 11(1), 75–85. https://doi.org/10.24014/potensia.v11i1.35687
Bjork, R. A., & Bjork, E. L. (2011). Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning. In M. A. Gernsbacher, R. W. Pew, L. M. Hough, & J. R. Pomerantz (Eds.), Psychology and the real world: Essays illustrating fundamental contributions to society (pp. 56–64). Worth Publishers.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.
Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random house.
Dweck, C. S., & Yeager, D. S. (2019). Mindsets: A View From Two Eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691618804166
Fairuz, S. N., Maulana, R. M. H., & Indah, L. L. (2026). Cultivating daily religious practices as a strategy for developing a growth mindset among lower-grade students at madrasah ibtidaiyah bahrul ulum. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 11(2), 960–969. https://journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/pendas/article/view/42726
Farhaty, M., Masita, & Mulyadin, W. (2025). Building a growth mindset through descriptive feedback: A qualitative study in fiqh instruction. Pendas: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Dasar, 10(4), 452–463. https://journal.unpas.ac.id/index.php/pendas/article/view/39257/21284
Gerlich, M. (2025). AI tools in society: Impacts on cognitive offloading and the future of critical thinking. Societies, 15(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15010006
Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1985). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of qualitative research, 2(163-194), 105.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Ilmudinulloh, R., Bustomi, A., & Pratiwi, W. R. (2024). The development of Kahoot-based learning media cooperative learning to improve learning motivation. Edudeena: Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 8(2), 128–144. https://doi.org/10.30762/ed.v8i2.2893
Kamali, M. H. (2003). Principles of Islamic jurisprudence (3rd rev. and enl. ed.). Islamic Texts Society.
Kresnandya, T. F., & Rizaldi, A. A. (2025). Generative AI adoption in Indonesian secondary education: A case study of SMP Negeri 1 Dawuan Majalengka Regency. Journal on Smart Learning Technologies, 1(2), 98–108.
Kurniawan, D. (2026). Teachers’ perceptions and experiences in integrating generative AI into learning: A phenomenological inquiry in Indonesian secondary schools. Edukasia: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 7(1), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.62775/edukasia.v7i1.1819
Macnamara, B. N., & Burgoyne, A. P. (2022). Do growth mindset interventions impact students’ academic achievement? A systematic review and meta-analysis with recommendations for best practices. Psychological Bulletin, 149(3–4), 133–173. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000352
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). USA: Sage Publications. Terjemahan Tjetjep Rohindi Rohidi, UI-Press.
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 results (Volume I and II): Country notes – Indonesia. OECD Publishing.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Rahmi, S. N., Wahidmurni, & Susilawati, S. (2026). From surface learning to deep understanding: Interactive media as a means of strengthening elementary students’ critical thinking. Edudeena: Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 10(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.30762/edudeena.v10i1.8209
Rifqoh, F., Wangid, M. N., Suwarjo, S., & Ayriza, Y. (2026). Islamic educational values, teacher feedback, and academic resilience as predictors of self-regulated learning among madrasah students. International Journal of Islamic Educational Psychology, 7(1), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.18196/ijiep.v7i1.30976
Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016). Cognitive offloading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(9), 676–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002
Sisk, V. F., Burgoyne, A. P., Sun, J., Butler, J. L., & Macnamara, B. N. (2018). To What Extent and Under Which Circumstances Are Growth Mind-Sets Important to Academic Achievement? Two Meta-Analyses. Psychological Science, 29(4), 549–571. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617739704
Stadler, M., Bannert, M., & Sailer, M. (2024). Cognitive ease at a cost: LLMs reduce mental effort but compromise depth in student scientific inquiry. Computers in Human Behavior, 160, 108386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2024.108386
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. Guilford Press.
Tipton, E., Bryan, C., Murray, J., McDaniel, M., Schneider, B., & Yeager, D. S. (2023). Why meta-analyses of growth mindset and other interventions should follow best practices for examining heterogeneity: Commentary on Macnamara and Burgoyne (2023) and Burnette et al. (2023). Psychological Bulletin, 149(3–4), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000384
Ubaidillah, Maulida, A. I., Jannah, N. M., Hasanah, N. T., & Ma’sum, M. A. (2026). Strategies of Islamic elementary school (MI) teachers in fostering a growth mindset in students through Islamic reflection-based learning. Instruktur: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 5(2), 1–9.
Vitasari, D., & Sassi, K. (2024). Contemporary Islamic education in a global perspective: A comparative study of the National University of Singapore and Seoul National University. Edudeena: Journal of Islamic Religious Education, 8(2), 145–157. https://doi.org/10.30762/ed.v8i2.4026
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies? American Psychologist, 75(9), 1269–1284. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000794
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2023). Mindsets and adolescent mental health. Nature Mental Health, 1(2), 79–81. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-022-00009-5
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hendro Yulius Suryo Putro, Shoofii Syammari, Novi Rosita Rahmawati

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






