Speech Acts Analysis on King Charles III’s First Speech as the King of England and the Commonwealth Countries

Authors

  • Iva Nurlaili Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kediri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/ireell.v2i2.4962

Keywords:

King Charles III first speech, illocutionary acts, Speech acts

Abstract

After Queen Elizabeth II passed away, Prince Charles was officially crowned King Charles III, the King of England and the Commonwealth countries. In his first public speech as a king, delivered at Buckingham Palace on September 9, 2022, he expressed deep sorrow over the Queen’s passing, paid tribute to her lifetime of service as a queen, and pledged his dedication to the nation and the Commonwealth. This speech serves as a significant moment, marking the transition of leadership and strengthening the monarchy’s role in modern society. This study's aim is to find out the types of illocutionary acts in King Charles III’s first speech by using Searle’s Speech Acts Theory. This study uses a descriptive qualitative research design. The study examines the official speech transcript to identify and categorize the speech acts used. The findings reveal 43 instances of illocutionary acts, which are divided into four categories: assertive, commissive, expressive, and declarative. These speech acts provide multiple functions, including expressing personal emotions, affirming commitments to the people, and reinforcing the monarchy's authority. The results of this study highlight the strategic use of language in royal speech. Understanding the illocutionary aspects of King Charles III’s speech contributes to a broader analysis of political communication and pragmatics in leadership discourse.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdullahi, C. A. (2021). The Meaning and Scope of Pragmatics. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), Vol V, 102-105.

Al, P. I. (2019). An Analysis of Speech Act Used in Harry Potter and The Goblet of Fire Movie. International Journal of Language and Literature. Vol. 3, 78-88.

RR. Ponco Dewi Kayaningsih, M. (2018). Ilmu Komunikasi. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Samudra Biru.

Kurniati, D. P. (2016). Modul Komunikasi Verbal dan Non Verbal. Bali. Lestari, T. (2020). The Impotance of The Role of Communication in People's Lives and Important in Aspect of Life. 1-10.

Lestari, T. (2020). Komunikasi sosial dalam perspektif modern. PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Huang, Y. (2017). The Oxford Handbook of Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press. Mogalakwe, M. (2006). The Use of Documentary Research Methods in Social Research. African Sociological Review , 221-230.

Morgan, P. C. (1975). Syntax and Semantics. New Yorck: Academic Press.

Mulyawati, F. (2020). An Analysis of Speech Act of Kim Namjun's Speech at The United Nation Genera Assembly 2018. 9-10.

Nagasubramani, R. a. (2018). Effective oral and Written Communication. Journal of Applied and Advanced Research, 29-32.

Najamuddin. (2018). Analisis Tindak Tutur Dalam Acara "Indonesia Lawyers Club" TV One . Putri I.A.P.A.D.P, R. D. (2019). An Analysis of Speech Act Used in Harry Potter and The Goblet of Fire Movie. International Journal of Language and Literature, 78-88.

Rahman, N. S. (2018). Speech Acts Analysis of Donald Trump's Speech. Professional Journal of English Education, 125-132. Umar, T. F. (2016). The Analysis of Speech Act of President Joko Widodo at APEC. 28-45

Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.

Violeta, R. (2019). Speech Acts Analysis of The Main Character in Maleficent Movie Script by Jane Mctee.

Wolcott, H. F. (1996). Transforming Qualitative Data: Description, Analysis, and Interpretation. Los Angeles: Sage.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Dalam H. Widdowson, Introductions to Language Study (hal. 3-4). New York: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

30-12-2024

How to Cite

Nurlaili, I. (2024). Speech Acts Analysis on King Charles III’s First Speech as the King of England and the Commonwealth Countries . IREELL: Indonesian Review of English Education, Linguistics, and Literature , 2(2), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.30762/ireell.v2i2.4962