Religious Politeness in Subtitling: A Brown and Levinson Analysis of Kiai’s Utterances in Sang Kiai

Authors

  • Ikke Dewi Pratama Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Mas Said Surakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/ireell.v4i1.8341

Keywords:

audiovisual translation, culture, politeness, pragmatics, subtitling

Abstract

This research analyzes the realization of politeness strategies in the Indonesian – English subtitles of Sang Kiai movie, focusing on how authority and power relations between Kiai Hasyim Asy’ari and his santri at Tebu Ireng Islamic boarding school, are represented in translation. Using a descriptive design with an ethnographic approach, the study analyzes 49 utterances drawn from the interactions between Kiai Hasyim Asy’ari and his santri in the source and target texts using Brown and Levinson’s politeness framework. The findings reveal that there are three recurrent patterns: (1) preservation of politeness strategy, (2) shift in politeness strategy, and (3) preservation of strategy with sub-strategic shift. The dominant pattern is preservation of politeness strategy, particularly in the use of bald on record and positive politeness, which reflects the institutional authority of Kiai Hasyim Asy’ari. The study shows that the subtitling largely maintains the power asymmetry inherent in pesantren discourse, suggesting that authority works as a key basis in the realization and translation of politeness strategies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ardi, H., Nababan, M. R., & Santosa, R. (2018). Characters’ politeness strategies in giving command: Should translators keep them? 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(2), 181–193.

Ayyina, M., & El, Y. (2025). Politeness in language of female students of the Al- Ishlahiyah Salafiyah Islamic Boarding School for girls in Malang city. Jurnal of Pedagogi : Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(1), 175–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62872/j1hydk82

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Cintas, D., & Remael, A. (2007). Audio-visual translation: Subtitling. St. Jerome Publishing.

Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. St. Jerome Publishing.

Guillot, M. N. (2020). The pragmatics of audiovisual translation: Voices from within in film subtitling. Journal of Pragmatics, 170, 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.015

Hatim, B., & Mason, I. (1997). The translator as communicator. Routledge.

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.

Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.

Ardi, H., Nababan, M. R., & Santosa, R. (2018). Characters’ politeness strategies in giving command: Should translators keep them? 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 24(2), 181–193.

Ayyina, M., & El, Y. (2025). Politeness in language of female students of the Al- Ishlahiyah Salafiyah Islamic Boarding School for girls in Malang city. Jurnal of Pedagogi : Jurnal Pendidikan, 2(1), 175–184. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.62872/j1hydk82

Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage. Cambridge University Press.

Cintas, D., & Remael, A. (2007). Audio-visual translation: Subtitling. St. Jerome Publishing.

Eelen, G. (2001). A critique of politeness theories. St. Jerome Publishing.

Guillot, M. N. (2020). The pragmatics of audiovisual translation: Voices from within in film subtitling. Journal of Pragmatics, 170, 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.09.015

Hatim, B., & Mason, I. (1997). The translator as communicator. Routledge.

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. Longman.

Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of politeness. Oxford University Press.

Nur, B., & Zakaria, A. (2016). Politeness strategies used by santri (male student) and ustadz (male teacher) in their interaction at Pesantren Salaf Al Quran Sholahul Huda Al-Mujahidin Malang. Anglicist, 05(02), 132–137.

Nwike, C. C., & Eze, A. N. (2024). Translating social identity: A sociolinguistic analysis of code-switching and politeness strategies in multilingual subtitling. Journal of Chinese & African Studies (JOCAS), 5(1).

Paramita, N., & Sampurna, R. A. (2025). Skopos theory and cultural preservation in the short film Tilik (2018). Journal of Language Intelligence and Culture, 7(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.35719/jlic.v7i1.649

Pavlović, N. (2002). The pragmatic theory of politeness in TV subtitling. Studia Romanica et Anglica Zagrabiensia, 47–48, 385–400. www.transedit.st,

Pinto, D. (2010). Lost in subtitle translations: The case of advice in the English subtitles of Spanish films. Intercultural Pragmatics, 7(2), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1515/IPRG.2010.012

Pratama, I. D. (2017). Politeness strategies as an instrument for characterization: A case study on Indonesian webtoon My Pre-Wedding and its English version. ELTLT Proceeding, Universitas Negeri Semarang., 258.

Reiss, K., & Vermeer, H. J. (2014). Towards a General Theory of Translational Action: Skopos Theory Explained (C. Nord, Tran.). Routledge.

Schäffner, C. (2010). Skopos Theory. In Y. Gambier & L. van Doorslaer (Eds.), Handbook of Translation Studies (pp. 235–238). John Benjamins. https://doi.org/ttps://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-33136-8_42

Smith, G. (2024). The role of pragmatics in cross-cultural communication. European Journal of Linguistics, 3(1), 14–24.

Spradley, J. P. (2007). Metode Etnografi. Tiara Wacana.

Tretyakova, T. P. (2016). On politeness in translation. Journal of Siberian Federal University. Humanities & Social Sciences, 3(9), 653–661. https://doi.org/10.17516/1997-1370-2016-9-3-653-661.Research

Vermeer, H. J. (1989). Skopos and Commission in Translational Action. In A. Chesterman (Ed.), Readings in Translation Theory (pp. 173–187). Oy Finn Lectura Ab.

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness. Cambridge University Press.

Wibisono, B., Haryono, A., & Fadlil, F. M. (2022). The use of honorifics in Islamic boarding schools as a form of maintaining a culture of courtesy. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 9(04), 6952–6967. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v9i04.08

Yueguo, G. (1990). Politeness phenomena in modern Chinese. Journal of Pragmatics, 14(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(90)90082

Downloads

Published

22-04-2026

How to Cite

Pratama, I. D. (2026). Religious Politeness in Subtitling: A Brown and Levinson Analysis of Kiai’s Utterances in Sang Kiai . IREELL: Indonesian Review of English Education, Linguistics, and Literature , 4(1), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.30762/ireell.v4i1.8341