How the GEMOY Game Supports Literacy Development: Insight from Secondary EFL Students Responses
Keywords:
GEMOY Game, Literacy Development, Secondary EFL Students, ResponsesAbstract
Literacy is crucial for learning because it helps students understand and work with written materials, but many students today have difficulties with reading, which affects their overall school performance. This study explores the effectiveness of the GEMOY (Gleaming English Game for Youth) in enhancing literacy skills among secondary EFL students of SMPN 2 Dongko Trenggalek. Utilizing a quantitative approach, responses were collected from 25 students who engaged with the GEMOY game as part of their learning process. Data were collected through closed-ended interviews with a Likert scale to assess students' responses to the game's effectiveness in improving their literacy. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics to determine the overall trend in students' perceptions of the GEMOY game. Secondary EFL students reported an average score of 4.20 for understanding English texts, 4.40 for effectiveness in expanding vocabulary, 4.10 for effectiveness in helping students identify main ideas, and 4.00 for improving sentence writing. These results indicate that GEMOY effectively enhances literacy development by providing an engaging and interactive learning experience. The study highlights the potential of educational games to address gaps in traditional literacy instruction methods and offers valuable insights into integrating game-based learning. The findings suggest that incorporating GEMOY into English language teaching can significantly benefit EFL students by making literacy instruction more dynamic and effective.
Downloads
References
Almusharraf, Norah. 2023. “Incorporation of a Game-Based Approach into the EFL Online Classrooms: Students’ Perceptions.” Interactive Learning Environments 31(7):4440–53.
Cahyono, Muh Felix Agung, Hesty Puspita Sari, and Nita Sutanti. 2024. “WHEN QUIZWHIZZER IS USED EFFECTIVELY AT SMAN 1 BLITAR IN THE TENTH GRADE TO ENHANCE STUDENTS’READING COMPREHENSION.” JARES (Journal of Academic Research and Sciences) 9(2):64–75.
Carless, David, and David Boud. 2018. “The Development of Student Feedback Literacy: Enabling Uptake of Feedback.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 43(8):1315–25.
Connor, Carol McDonald, Susan R. Goldman, and Barry Fishman. 2014. “Technologies That Support Students’ Literacy Development.” Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology 591–604.
Duke, Nell K., P. David Pearson, Stephanie L. Strachan, and Alison K. Billman. 2011. “Essential Elements of Fostering and Teaching Reading Comprehension.” What Research Has to Say about Reading Instruction 4(1):286–314.
Harvey, Stephanie, and Anne Goudvis. 2007. Strategies That Work: Teaching Comprehension for Understanding and Engagement. Stenhouse publishers.
Hsieh, Yufen, and Siouwun Huang. 2020. “Using an E-Book in the Secondary English Classroom: Effects on EFL Reading and Listening.” Education and Information Technologies 25(2):1285–1301.
Khalifatussalam, Rizky Ida. 2021. “Low Literacy in Indonesia: Understanding and Factors That Influence It.” Low Literacy in Indonesia: Understanding and Factors That Influence It, November 1–8.
de Kleijn, Renske A. M. 2023. “Supporting Student and Teacher Feedback Literacy: An Instructional Model for Student Feedback Processes.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 48(2):186–200.
Lee, Yoonmi. 2010. “Views on Education and Achievement: Finland’s Story of Success and South Korea’s Story of Decline.” KEDI Journal of Educational Policy 7(2).
Leigh, Isaac. 2018. The Guardian. AuthorHouse.
Ni’mah, Fatchiyatun. 2019. “Research Trends of Scientific Literacy in Indonesia: Where Are We?” Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA 5(1):23–30.
Primasari, Yusniarsi. 2020. “EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ADVENTURE OF TIMUN EMAS GAME IN IMPROVING THE READING SCORE OF INFORMATICS ENGINEERING STUDENTS.” JOSAR (Journal of Students Academic Research) 5(2):75–82.
Primasari, Yusniarsi, Sri Lestanti, and Riska Dhenabayu. 2019. “Effectiveness of Reading for Islamic Education: Design of Multi-Platform Educational Game as Instructional Media.” Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education 3(2):140–48.
Primasari, Yusniarsi, Hesty Puspita Sari, and Adin Fauzi. 2021. “Pengembangan Literasi Sekolah Melalui Pelatihan Menulis Cerita.” Prima Abdika: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat 1(4):158–66.
Sahlberg, Pasi. 2014. Finnish Lessons 2.0: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland? Teachers College Press.
Sari, Hesty Puspita, and Wahyu Dwi Lestari. 2020. “Designing Superlary Game to Learn Vocabulary of Tenth Grade Students.” EDUCATIO: Journal of Education 5(2):159–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.29138/educatio.v5i2.296.
Setiawan, Reza Ramadani, Hesty Puspita Sari, Nita Sutanti, and Supriyono Supriyono. 2023. “Visual Novel Games as A Learning Medium in Developing Reading Skills of Grade X.” Pp. 175–84 in Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FPMIPA. Vol. 1.
Snyder, R. L., and David L. Bish. 1989. “Quantitative Analysis.” Modern Powder Diffraction 20:101–44.
Turuk Kuek, Mamour Choul. 2010. “Developing Critical Thinking Skills through Integrative Teaching of Reading and Writing in the L2 Writing Classroom.”
Widianto, Poppy Carolina, Dian Fadhilawati, Nita Sutanti, and Supriyono Supriyono. 2024. “Examining Quizalize’s Impact on Students’ Reading Comprehension Mastery.” Jurnal Pendidikan: Riset Dan Konseptual 8(2):338–49.
Yu-Ju, Fu, Chen Shu-Hui, Wey Shyh-Chyi, and Chen Shu-Chu. 2014. “The Effects of Reading Strategy Instruction via Electronic Storybooks on EFL Young Readers’ Reading Performance.” International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research 1(1):9–20.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yusniarsi Primasari, Supriyono, Yayuk Dwi Lestari, Hesty Puspita Sari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.