Arabic Language Debates to Enhance Speaking Competence at Islamic Boarding Schools

Rodiatul Maghfiroh; Bakri Muhammad Bakheet; Mohammad Shohibul Anwar

doi:10.30762/asalibuna.v9i01.5902

Authors

Rodiatul Maghfiroh Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Tarbiyah Buntet Pesantren Cirebon
Bakri Muhammad Bakheet University of Holy Qur'an and Islamic Scince, Sudan
Mohammad Shohibul Anwar Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Maulana Malik Ibrahim, Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/asalibuna.v9i01.5902

Keywords:

Arabic Education, Arabic Debate, Speaking Skills, Debat Bahasa Arab

Abstract

This study aims to describe the characteristics, supporting factors, inhibitory factors and its implications in improving students' speaking competence at the Al Amien Prenduan Islamic Boarding. The research is conducted using a qualitative approach through data collection methods that include interviews, observations, and discussion groups. The study subjects consist of active students who participate in debate activities and mentors or related teachers. Data were analyzed using NVivo software to perform coding and thematic analysis, which allows for the identification of main themes and sub-themes related to the implementation of the debate program. The research results show that the characteristics of the debate program include the use of Standard Arabic, the active role of mentors, and the structuring of ethically stimulating debate discussions. Supporting factors include teacher support, adequate facilities, and motivation from fellow students. On the other hand, inhibitory factors encompass limitations in preparation time, disturbances from the surrounding environment, and obstacles related to the complexity of the language. The analysis using NVivo reinforces the findings that active student involvement in debate not only enhances speaking skills but also strengthens confidence and ethical conduct during discussions. The implications of this program include the enhancement of communication, effective oral communication skills, and the formation of character-responsive students who engage in ethical speaking.

Abstrak:

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mendeskripsikan karakteristik, faktor pendukung, faktor penghambat serta implikasinya dalam meningkatkan kompetensi berbicara siswa di Pondok Pesantren Al Amien Prenduan. Penelitian dilakukan dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif melalui metode pengumpulan data yang meliputi wawancara, observasi, dan kelompok diskusi. Subjek studi terdiri dari siswa aktif yang mengikuti kegiatan debat dan mentor atau guru terkait. Data dianalisis menggunakan perangkat lunak NVivo untuk melakukan pengkodean dan analisis tematik, yang memungkinkan identifikasi tema utama dan sub-tema yang terkait dengan pelaksanaan program debat. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa karakteristik program debat meliputi penggunaan bahasa Arab Standar, peran aktif mentor, dan penataan diskusi debat yang merangsang secara etis. Faktor pendukung antara lain dukungan guru, fasilitas yang memadai, dan motivasi dari sesama siswa. Di sisi lain, faktor penghambatan mencakup keterbatasan waktu persiapan, gangguan dari lingkungan sekitar, dan hambatan yang terkait dengan kompleksitas bahasa. Analisis menggunakan NVivo memperkuat temuan bahwa keterlibatan aktif siswa dalam debat tidak hanya meningkatkan keterampilan berbicara tetapi juga memperkuat kepercayaan diri dan perilaku etis selama diskusi. Implikasi dari program ini meliputi peningkatan komunikasi, keterampilan komunikasi lisan yang efektif, dan pembentukan siswa yang responsif karakter yang terlibat dalam berbicara etis.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aflisia, N., & Harahap, P. (2019). Eksisten Bi’ah Lughawiyah Sebagai Media Berbahasa Arab dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Muhadatsah Mahasiswa Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab IAIN Curup. Lisanul’Arab: Journal of Arabic Learning and Teaching, 8(1), 40–55.

Afyuddin, Moh Sholeh, and M. Syamsul Maarif. 2023. “Listening Learning Strategy Used by Arabic Education Students.” Al-Irfan : Journal of Arabic Literature and Islamic Studies 6 (1): 138–66. https://doi.org/10.58223/alirfan.v6i1.6617.

AlMaghlouth, N., Arvanitis, R., Cointet, J.-P., & Hanafi, S. (2015). Who frames the debate on the Arab uprisings? Analysis of Arabic, English, and French academic scholarship. International Sociology, 30(4), 418–441.

Astari, R., Yunaz, A., & Faturrahman, M. I. (2022). The Grammatical Deviations in The Arabic Debate Competition in Indonesia. Arabiyat: Journal of Arabic Education & Arabic Studies/Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Dan Kebahasaaraban, 9(2).

Aziz, C. N. (2020). Enhancing Speaking Skills of EFL Students Through Debate. Journal of English Education, Literature and Linguistics, 3(2), 1–15.

Besong, B. (2016). Teaching the debate.

Cinganotto, L. (2019). Debate as a teaching strategy for language learning. Lingue e Linguaggi, 30, 107–125.

Davis, K. A., Zorwick, M. L. W., Roland, J., & Wade, M. M. (2016). Using debate in the classroom: encouraging critical thinking, communication, and collaboration. Routledge.

Hidayanti, P. N. Y., & Maturedy, F. (2023). Implementation of Formative Evaluation on Arabic Debate Learning to Improve Arabic Language Skills. Al-Fusha: Arabic Language Education Journal, 5(2), 43–49.

Jhon W. Creswell, C. N. P. (2017). Qualitative Inquiry & Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches. Russian Journal of Sociology (Vol. 3). https://doi.org/10.13187/rjs.2017.1.30

Marginson, S., & Dang, T. K. A. (2017). Vygotsky’s sociocultural theory in the context of globalization. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 37(1), 116–129.

Matthew B. Miles, A. Michael Huberman, J. S. (2018). Qualitative Data Analysis A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE (Vol. 3). Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-59379-1%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-420070-8.00002-7%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ab.2015.03.024%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1080/07352689.2018.1441103%0Ahttp://www.chile.bmw-motorrad.cl/sync/showroom/lam/es/

Munir, M., & Maslihah, R. E. (2021). Takwīn al-Bīah al-Lughawiyyah Litarqiyah al-Mahārah al-Intājiyyah fī al-Ma’āhid al-‘Aṣriyyah bi Ponorogo. LISANIA: Journal of Arabic Education and Literature, 5(2), 237–251.

Muslimah, Maziyyatul, Moh. Sholeh Afyuddin, Machrup Eko Cahyono, and Satria Adi Pradana. 2025. “Bridging Language Learning and Entrepreneurship : Examining Arabic Language Students ’ Potential in Developing ’ Arabic for Specific Purposes ’ Module Projects” 3 (1): 13–32.

Muttaqien, A., & Faedurrohman, F. (2022). Strategi Pelatihan Bahasa Arab dengan Metode Debat bagi Mahasiswa Komunitas Al-Kindy di Pusat Ma’had Al-Jaami’ah UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang. Al-Muyassar: Journal of Arabic Education, 1(1), 28–39.

Nasution, D. K. (2020). Improving The Students’ Achievementr In Listening By Applying Debate Plus Method. Indonesian Journal of Education and Mathematical Science (IJEMS). UMSU.

Ni’mah, A., Harunasari, S. Y., & Susilawati, S. (2019). Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berbicara Siswa melalui Teknik Debat. In Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan STKIP Kusuma Negara.

Ninoersy, T. T. N., & Akmal, S. (2020). Penerapan Pola Perkuliahan Muhadatsah Melalui Metode Debat Aktif Pada Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Fakultas Tarbiyah Dan Keguruan Uin Ar-Raniry Banda Aceh. JURNAL ILMIAH DIDAKTIKA, 20(2), 165–188.

Pradi Khusufi Syamsu. (2022). Pembelajaran Bahasa Arab Integratif di Perguruan Tinggi. YPM.

Pratama, A. W. (2024). DEBAT ITU ADA SENINYA!: Pedoman Sederhana Debat Bahasa Arab berbasis Metode Qatar Debate. PENERBIT KBM INDONESIA.

Rapanta, C., & Badran, D. (2016). Supporting Emirati females leadership skills through teaching them how to debate: Design, assessment, and considerations. The International Journal of Management Education, 14(2), 133–145.

Sanonguthai, S. (2011). Teaching IELTS writing module through English debate: A case study in Thailand. Language Testing in Asia, 1(4), 39.

Sari, P. Y., & Hasibuan, A. (2022). Penggunaan Teknik Active Debate Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berbicara Siswa Kelas X SMK Melati Perbaungan TP 2021-2022. Invention: Journal Research and Education Studies, 92–106.

Sayed, B. T., Bani Younes, Z. B., Alkhayyat, A., Adhamova, I., & Teferi, H. (2024). To be with artificial intelligence in oral test or not to be: a probe into the traces of success in speaking skill, psychological well-being, autonomy, and academic buoyancy. Language Testing in Asia, 14(1), 49.

Shapson, S. (1988). Bilingual and Multicultural Education: Canadian Perspective.

Sholihuddin, Ahmad, and Khoiru Nidak. 2023. “Integrative Diniyah Curriculum In Formal Schools At Tebuireng Pesantren Jombang.” Didaktika Religia: Journal of Islamic Education 11 (2): 101–22. https://jurnalpascasarjana.iainkediri.ac.id/index.php/didaktika/article/view/10.

Silalahi, R. M. (2019). Understanding Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development for learning. Polyglot: Jurnal Ilmiah, 15(2), 169–186.

Tianame, M., Usman, B., & Muslem, A. (2019). The implementation of debate technique to enhance the students’ speaking skill. English Education Journal, 10(2), 180–195.

Wade, W. P. (2016). Critical thinking through debate: Skills, dispositions, and teaching strategies. In Using Debate in the Classroom (pp. 95–106). Routledge.

Wahyuni, S., Ritonga, M., & Afrianti, W. (2023). Systematic Review of Learning Method for Teaching Arabic Listening and Speaking Skills. Al-Hayat: Journal of Islamic Education, 7(1), 30–41.

Wati, A. T., & Maula, N. D. (2021). Correlation between vocabulary mastery and Arabic debate ability. In 4th International Conference on Sustainable Innovation 2020–Social, Humanity, and Education (ICoSIHESS 2020) (pp. 233–238). Atlantis Press.

Wijaya, S. A. (2019). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Melalui Metode Pembelajaran Debat Aktif Pada Mata Kuliah Kewirausahan. JPEK (Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi Dan Kewirausahaan), 3(2), 173.

Zhou, Y., & Abd Halim, H. (2022). A learner corpus analysis of problem-solving schemata and move structures in debating discourse. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 569–583.

Zurriyati, Z. (2020). Taṭbīq Uslūb al-Munāẓarah ‘ala Tarqiyyah Mahārah al-Kalām (Dirāsah Ijrā’iyyah laday al-Ṭullāb fī al-Sanah al-Sādisah bi Ma’had ‘Ulūm al-Dīn Lhokseumawe). DAYAH: Journal of Islamic Education, 3(1), 16–26.

Zunairoh, Yuyun, Bagus Andrian Permata, and Moh Sholeh Afyuddin. 2021. “Tanmiyatu Mustawa Al-Dzakaa’ Al-Ruuhi Bistikhdami Al-Tafkir Al-Dzati ‘ala Dhaui ‘Kolb Self Reflection’ Bi Jamiah Kediri Al-Islamiyah Al-Hukumiyah.” Asalibuna 5 (2): 92–110. https://doi.org/10.30762/asalibuna.v5i02.910.