Illocutionary Act Analysis on United Nations Women Press: Gender Equality in the 2030 Agenda

Authors

  • Nadia Nur Fadzila Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kediri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/ireell.v1i1.1467

Keywords:

Illocutionary acts, Press conference, UN women, Utterance

Abstract

Illocutionary acts as part of the study of Pragmatics concern with the speakers’ intended meaning when they make utterances. The intended meaning can be the same as the literal meaning in the locution or it has different meaning depending on the context of the utterances. This paper reports on the illocutionary acts in the text of “Gender Equality in the 2030 Agenda” that is released in a press conference held by United Nations Women on February 15, 2018. Using categorization of type of Illocutionary acts from Yule (1996), that are representative, directive, commissive, expressive, and declarative. This study asked the question of what kind of illocutionary acts are found in the text and what is the dominant of them. The data was collected through documentation from UN women’s press website. This study found 5 types of illocutionary acts with a total of 44 data. The results of the study showed 27 representative illocutionary acts consisting of 1 warning, 7 assumptions, 10 demands, 6 affirmations, 1 stating, and 2 hypotheses, while commissive was found in total of 8 data, consisting of 3 promises, 1 swears, 3 advises, and 1 does. Directives type of illocution was found only in 2 utterances; both are about advice. Expressive Illocution was found in 3 data, comprising 1 praise, 2 thank. Lastly, directive was found in 4 utterances with 3 states and 1 asks. Therefore, the most widely used illocutionary speech act is representative with 27 utterances.

References

Ausin, J. L. (1962). How To Do Things With Words. Cambridge: Cambridge Universiy Press.

Birner, B. J. (2013). Introduction to Pragmatics.Chicester, West Sussexx: Wiley-Blackwell.

Guion, Lisa A. “Triangulation: Establishing the Validity of Qualitative Studies”, Institute of food and agriculture and science University of Florida (2002), FCS6014.

Griffith, P. (2006). An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Herman, F. S. (May 2019). Analysis of Illocutionary Acts in the Movie "You Are My Home" English Subtitle. Journal of English Education Study, Vol. 2 Issue 1 Page 29-36.

Hermer, J. (1983).The Pracice of English Language Teaching. Harlow, England: Pearson Longman.

Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge UniversityPress.

Mack, N. (2005). Qualitative Research Method. USA: USAID.

Marlina, D. R. (March 2018). The Analysis of Types Illocutionary Acts in "Tangled Movie".E-Journal of English Language and Literaur, Vol. 7 No. 1 page 28-34.

Nadar, F. X. (2009). PragmatikdanPenelitianPragmatik. Yogyakarta: GrahaIlmu.

Nugroho, A. S. (2011). An Analysis of Illocutionary Acts in SharelockHomles Movie. Jakarta: State Islamic University SyarifHidayatullah.

Rustono. 1999. Pokok-pokokPragmatik. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press.

Salsabila. (2021). An Analysis of Speech Acts in Shakira's Speech at Wise Conference Qatar. Lampung, Indonesia: State Islamic University of RadenIntan.

Sapir, E. (2004). Language. An Introduction to he study of Speech. New York. Harcour, Brace: Reprint: Dover Books on Language.

Sefriana, M. (2019). An Analysis of Illocutionary Acts and Perlocutionary Acts in Movie "Monte Carlo" by Thomas Bezucha. Lampung, Indonesia: RadenIntan State Islamic University.

Situmorang, M. S. (2017). Illocuionary Acts in Joko Widodo's Speech in High Level Conference, Riyadh 21st of May, 2017. Medan, Indonesia: University of Sumatra Utara.

Tarigan, H. G. (2009). PengajaranPragmatik. Bandung: Angkasa.

Umar,Try Fahmi, The analysis of Speech Act of Presiden Joko Widodo at APEC Forum. UIN Alauddin 2016.

Wardani, N. A. (2011). An Analysis of Illocutionary Act in Prince of Persia: The Sand of Time Movie. Jakarta: State Islamic University "SyarifHidayaullah".

Wijana, D. P. (1996). Dasar-DasarPragmatik. Yogyakarta: Andi.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford Universiy Press.

Downloads

Published

11-04-2023

How to Cite

Fadzila, N. N. (2023). Illocutionary Act Analysis on United Nations Women Press: Gender Equality in the 2030 Agenda. IREELL: Indonesian Review of English Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 1(1), 54–66. https://doi.org/10.30762/ireell.v1i1.1467

Issue

Section

Articles