An Analysis of Politeness Strategies Used by Teacher and Students in English Class at SMPN 1 Mojo Kediri

Authors

  • Lailatul Mukharomah Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kediri
  • Ossa Bodhi Tala Sumanto Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Kediri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/ireell.v1i1.1589

Keywords:

Analysis, Politeness Strategies, English Class

Abstract

Politeness is a vital component in communication as it assists in preventing misunderstandings, reducing conflict, and building harmony between interlocutors, such as communication between the educator and learners in the educational setting. This descriptive qualitative study attempts to explore the types and preferred politeness techniques employed by both educators and learners in an English class. An English teacher and 40 students of class 7 G SMPN 1 Mojo Kediri were the participants of this research. The research's primary instrument was an observation by video recording and documentation, which was afterward examined by the researchers through data reduction, display of data, conclusion drawing, and triangular validation. The data was evaluated employing Leech's politeness theory, involving the following maxims: tact maxim, generosity maxim, approbation maxim, modesty maxim, agreement maxim, and sympathy maxim. The findings revealed that the instructor employed all six maxims, namely tact, generosity, approbation, modesty, agreement, and sympathy maxim. While the students only employed four maxims, they displayed tact, modesty, agreement, and sympathy maxim. There are 132 utterances between the instructor and students, and it was discovered that the agreement maxim was the most frequently employed politeness approach by the teacher and students, with 41 frequencies used by the teacher and 37 frequencies used by the students.

References

Annisah, Waliyudin, Ramli, &Nurbaya. (2021). Politeness Maxims Used by English Students Program Study at STKIP Taman SiswaBima. JurnalIlmiah Mandala Education, 7(3), 2019–2022. https://doi.org/10.36312/jime.v7i3.2321

Leech, G. (2014). The Pragmatics of Politeness. United States of America: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315857381

Leech, G. N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. United States of America: Longman. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-74564-5_12

Fitriyani, S., &Andriyanti, E. (2020).Teacher and Students’ Politeness Strategies in EFL Classroom Interactions.IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics), 4(2), 259. https://doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v4i2.473

Hamani, T., &Puluhulawa, Y. (2019).Pragmatics Analysis of Maxim Flouting Done By the Main Characters in Kungfu Panda Movie By Jonathan Aibel& Glenn Berger.British (Jurnal Bahasa Dan Sastra Inggris), 8(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.31314/british.8.1.16-26.2019.

Muhasibi, A. N. (2021). “Politeness Strategies Used by Teacher and Students on Online English Teaching Learning Process At Smp N 2 Tanon,Sragen in Academic Year 2020/2021.”IAIN Surakarta.

Retrieved from http://dspace.ucuenca.edu.ec/bitstream/123456789/35612/1/Trabajo deTitulacion.pdf%0Ahttps://educacion.gob.ec/wpcontent/uploads/downloads/2019/01/GUIA-METODOLOGICA-EF.pdf

Rostikawati, Y., Aeni, E. S., &Wuryani, W. (2020).Peran Guru DalamMembentukKarakterSiswaMelaluiPembelajaranKesantunanBerbahasa di Media Sosial.AbdimasSiliwangi, 03(01), 112–120.

Watts, R. J. (2003). Politeness: Key Topics in Sociolinguistics. United States of America: Cambridge University Press.

Yule, G. (1996). Pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Downloads

Published

11-07-2023

How to Cite

Mukharomah, L. ., & Sumanto, O. B. T. . (2023). An Analysis of Politeness Strategies Used by Teacher and Students in English Class at SMPN 1 Mojo Kediri. IREELL: Indonesian Review of English Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 1(1), 78–90. https://doi.org/10.30762/ireell.v1i1.1589

Issue

Section

Articles