Preliminary Needs Analysis for an Inclusive Vocational Curriculum Based on Women’s Roles and Industrial Partnerships

Authors

  • Annisa Romadloni Politeknik Negeri Cilacap, Indonesia
  • Linda Perdana Wanti Politeknik Negeri Cilacap, Indonesia
  • Laura Sari Politeknik Negeri Cilacap, Indonesia
  • Dwi Ratih Nolaputri Politeknik Negeri Cilacap, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/ireell.v4i2.9600

Keywords:

design-based research, inclusive vocational curriculum, industrial partnership, Gender Analysis Pathway, Universal Design for Learning, women’s roles

Abstract

An inclusive vocational curriculum requires connecting technical competence with gender responsiveness, disability access, sustainability, and authentic workplace learning, yet women’s social roles and industrial partnerships have rarely been converted into measurable curriculum elements. This study positions women’s roles not as a demographic variable but as a curriculum-generating source, and it reports a preliminary needs analysis as the first stage of a design-based research (DBR) agenda at a public polytechnic in Indonesia. A small-scale mixed-methods survey was administered to 20 stakeholders: five curriculum managers, four lecturers, six students, three education support staff, and two external partners. Likert-scale responses were analyzed descriptively and grouped into seven constructs, and open-ended responses were analyzed thematically. The strongest enabling conditions were external partners’ overall readiness (M = 4.38), the availability of project-based learning spaces reported by lecturers (M = 4.75), and perceived classroom safety (M = 4.75). The largest perceived gaps concerned disability and Universal Design for Learning (UDL) integration (managers’ construct M = 2.30), gender analysis in curriculum review (M = 2.60), representation of women’s contributions (M = 2.60), and partner involvement in instruction (lecturers’ M = 2.50). Because the data are perceptual, descriptive, and drawn from a single site, the findings provide preliminary evidence that gender analysis, UDL, SDG-oriented project-based learning, and living-lab partnerships could be embedded in learning outcomes, lesson plans, rubrics, and monitoring indicators, a design hypothesis to be tested in the co-design phase.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Annisa Romadloni, Politeknik Negeri Cilacap, Indonesia

 

 

Linda Perdana Wanti, Politeknik Negeri Cilacap, Indonesia

 

 

Laura Sari, Politeknik Negeri Cilacap, Indonesia

 

 

Dwi Ratih Nolaputri, Politeknik Negeri Cilacap, Indonesia

 

 

References

Alinea, J. M. L., & Reyes, W. S. (2023). A gender and industry-responsive curriculum model for technical-vocational teacher education program. Journal of Research, Policy & Practice of Teachers & Teacher Education, 13(2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.37134/jrpptte.vol13.2.1.2023

Almeqdad, Q., Alodat, A., Alquraan, M., Mohaidat, M., & Al-Makhzoomy, A. (2023). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Cogent Education, 10, 2218191. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2218191

Bakker, A. (2018). Design Research in Education. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203701010

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597

Capp, M. J. (2017). The effectiveness of universal design for learning: a meta-analysis of literature between 2013 and 2016. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 21(8), 791–807. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2017.1325074

Cresswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. In SAGE Publications (Vol. 31, Number 4).

Cumming, T. M., & Rose, M. C. (2022). Exploring universal design for learning as an accessibility tool in higher education: a review of the current literature. The Australian Educational Researcher, 49(5), 1025–1043. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00471-7

Ebrahimi, R., Choobchian, S., Farhadian, H., Goli, I., Farmandeh, E., & Azadi, H. (2022). Investigating the effect of vocational education and training on rural women’s empowerment. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 9(1), 167. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01187-4

Harpur, P., Stafford, L., & Ellis, K. (2025). A disability-led disability inclusion strategy for the higher education sector. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 47(3), 368–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/1360080X.2025.2478537

Korthals Altes, T., Willemse, M., Goei, S. L., & Ehren, M. (2024). Higher education teachers’ understandings of and challenges for inclusion and inclusive learning environments: A systematic literature review. Educational Research Review, 43, 100605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2024.100605

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2018). Conducting Educational Design Research. In Conducting Educational Design Research. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315105642

Molina, Á., Helldén, D., Alfven, T., Niemi, M., Leander, K., Nordenstedt, H., Rehn, C., Ndejjo, R., Wanyenze, R., & Biermann, O. (2023). Integrating the United Nations sustainable development goals into higher education globally: a scoping review. Global Health Action, 16. https://doi.org/10.1080/16549716.2023.2190649

Moriña, A. (2017). Inclusive education in higher education: challenges and opportunities. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2016.1254964

Rahayu, I. S., & Aryanti, T. (2022). Gender in Vocational Education. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220305.022

Ramadhan, N. G., Purnomo, Widiyanti, Suhartadi, S., & Purnawirawan, O. (2025). Model of Education System in Indonesia Vocational High Schools Based on the Aspects School Cooperation with Industry Through Work-Based Learning to Improve Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 5(3), e05013. https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n03.pe05013

Ray, S., & Zarestky, J. (2022). Gender in vocational education and training: an integrative review. In European Journal of Training and Development (Vol. 46, Number 9). https://doi.org/10.1108/EJTD-12-2019-0196

Schmalenbach, C., & Ashouri, C. (2025). Design-Based Research—A Framework for Participation and Action in Educational Research. International Review of Qualitative Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/19408447251387997

Schreffler, J., Vasquez III, E., Chini, J., & James, W. (2019). Universal Design for Learning in postsecondary STEM education for students with disabilities: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-019-0161-8

Stentiford, L., & Koutsouris, G. (2021). What are inclusive pedagogies in higher education? A systematic scoping review. Studies in Higher Education, 46(11), 2245–2261. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2020.1716322

Stentiford, L., & Koutsouris, G. (2022). Critically considering the ‘inclusive curriculum’ in higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(8), 1250–1272. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2022.2122937

UNESCO. (2020). Global Education Monitoring Report 2020: Inclusion and Education—All Means All. http://www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en

Wahyuni, S., Pantiwati, Y., Sunaryo, H., In’am, A., & Bastian, A. (2025). Strategizing Universal Design for Learning (UDL) Implementation: Enhancing Inclusive Education for Students with Disabilities in Higher Education. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i1.6630

Wignall, R., Piquard, B., & Joel, E. (2023). Up-skilling women or de-skilling patriarchy? How TVET can drive wider gender transformation and the decent work agenda in Sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 102, 102850. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102850

Xie, J., & Rice, M. F. (2021). Professional and social investment in universal design for learning in higher education: insights from a faculty development programme. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(7), 886–900. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1827372

Downloads

Published

28-10-2026

How to Cite

Romadloni, A., Wanti, L. P., Sari, L., & Dwi Ratih Nolaputri. (2026). Preliminary Needs Analysis for an Inclusive Vocational Curriculum Based on Women’s Roles and Industrial Partnerships. IREELL: Indonesian Review of English Education, Linguistics, and Literature , 4(2), 197–225. https://doi.org/10.30762/ireell.v4i2.9600