Acceptability of English-Indonesian Machine Translation in Translating Stand-Up Comedy Humor

Authors

  • Reydina Isnata Churulliain Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia
  • Nany Soengkono Madayani Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/ireell.v4i2.9630

Keywords:

acceptability, humor translation, large language model (LLM), machine translation, stand-up comedy

Abstract

Despite the growing accuracy of machine translation (MT) in general-purpose tasks, its performance on culturally embedded, humor-driven text remains largely unexamined, particularly for the English-Indonesian language pair. This study examines the acceptability of humor translation produced by three MT tools, Google Translate, DeepL, and ChatGPT, using 20 humorous utterances drawn from Paul Snyder's stand-up comedy special "I Left the House for This" as the source data. A qualitative-dominant mixed-methods design was employed: the utterances were identified using Ruch, Attardo, and Raskin's General Theory of Verbal Humor, translated by the three tools, and evaluated using an adapted acceptability rubric, followed by a focus group discussion to consolidate the scores. On a 1-3 acceptability scale, Google Translate scored 1.42, DeepL 1.58 (both Unacceptable, though DeepL approached the Less Acceptable range) and ChatGPT 2.35, narrowly crossing into the Acceptable category. The main factors lowering acceptability were the use of formal written register in an informal spoken context, untransferred cultural references, and inconsistent pronoun choice. Despite occasional inconsistencies, ChatGPT produced the most natural and colloquial translations among the three tools. This study concludes that ChatGPT is currently the most suitable MT tool for translating humor from English stand-up comedy into Indonesian, while Google Translate and DeepL still require substantial human post-editing for this type of content. These findings offer novel empirical insight into MT-humor acceptability for an understudied language pair and genre.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Reydina Isnata Churulliain, Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia

 

 

Nany Soengkono Madayani, Universitas Islam Negeri Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung, Indonesia

 

 

References

Abu-Rayyash, H. (2024). AI meets comedy: Viewers' reactions to GPT-4 generated humor translation. Ampersand, 12, 100162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2023.100162

Ardi, H., Al Hafizh, M., Rezqi, I., & Tuzzikriah, R. (2022). Can machine translations translate humorous texts? Humanus, 21(1), 99–112. https://doi.org/10.24036/humanus.v21i1.115698

Arroihana, F. Z., & Kurniarahman, I. (2024). Analyzing Translation Methods in the Hidden Figures Movie. IREELL, Indonesian Review of English Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 2(2), 137–160. https://doi.org/10.30762/ireell.v2i2.3720

Calvo-Ferrer, J. R. (2024). Can you tell the difference? A study of human vs machine-translated subtitles. Perspectives, 32(6), 1115-1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2023.2268149

Chan, V., & Tang, W. K. W. (2024). GPT for translation: A systematic literature review. SN Computer Science, 5(8), 986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42979-024-03340-z

Chen, S., & Lin, Y. (2025). A multidimensional comparison of ChatGPT, Google Translate, and DeepL in Chinese tourism texts translation: Fidelity, fluency, cultural sensitivity, and persuasiveness. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 8, 1619489. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2025.1619489

Chiaro, D. (2010). Translation, humour and literature (Vol. 1). Continuum.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Díaz Cintas, J., & Remael, A. (2014). Audiovisual translation: Subtitling. Routledge.

Double, O. (2014). Getting the joke: The inner workings of stand-up comedy (2nd ed.). Bloomsbury Methuen Drama.

Dry Bar Comedy. (2024). Paul Snyder: I Left the House for This. YouTube. https://youtu.be/8DNQ8DYgCJE

Gaspari, F., & Hutchins, W. J. (2007). Online and free! Ten years of online machine translation: Origins, developments, current use and future prospects. Proceedings of MT Summit XI, 199–206.

House, J. (2014). Translation quality assessment: Past and present. Routledge.

Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224

Larson, M. L. (1984). Meaning-based translation: A guide to cross-language equivalence. University Press of America.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Low, P. A. (2011). Translating jokes and puns. Perspectives: Studies in Translatology, 19(1), 59-70. https://doi.org/10.1080/0907676X.2010.493219

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Mintz, L. E. (1985). Standup comedy as social and cultural mediation. American Quarterly, 37(1), 71. https://doi.org/10.2307/2712763

Nababan, M., Nuraeni, A., & Sumardiono. (2012). Pengembangan model penilaian kualitas terjemahan. Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, 24(1), 39–57.

Newmark, P. (1988). A textbook of translation. Prentice Hall.

Nord, C. (1997). Text analysis in translation: Theory, methodology, and didactic application of a model for translation-oriented text analysis. Rodopi.

Ruch, W., Attardo, S., & Raskin, V. (1993). Toward an empirical verification of the General Theory of Verbal Humor. Humor, 6(2), 123–136. https://doi.org/10.1515/humr.1993.6.2.123

Rudenko, E. S., & Semenova, M. Y. (2024). Artificial vs human intelligence: a case study of translating jokes based on wordplay. Research Result. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, 10(4), 53–93. https://doi.org/10.18413/2313-8912-2024-10-4-0-4

Sahari, Y., Al-Kadi, A. M. T., & Ali, J. K. M. (2023). A cross-sectional study of ChatGPT in translation: Magnitude of use, attitudes, and uncertainties. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(6), 2937–2954. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-023-10031-y

Sun, R. (2024). Evaluating the translation accuracy of ChatGPT and DeepL through the lens of implied subjects. AWEJ for Translation & Literary Studies, 8(4).

Utimadini, N. J. (2023). Exploring perceptions of machine translation as a tool for EFL learning. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 12(2), 484–494. https://doi.org/10.31571/bahasa.v12i2.7128

Venuti, L. (2003). The translator's invisibility. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203360064

Zabalbeascoa, P. (1996). Translating jokes for dubbed television situation comedies. The Translator, 2(2), 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/13556509.1996.10798976

Downloads

Published

28-10-2026

How to Cite

Churulliain, R. I., & Madayani, N. S. (2026). Acceptability of English-Indonesian Machine Translation in Translating Stand-Up Comedy Humor. IREELL: Indonesian Review of English Education, Linguistics, and Literature , 4(2), 227–243. https://doi.org/10.30762/ireell.v4i2.9630