Peer Review Process

Every article published in the Allimna Journal through the process of double-peer-review by a peer-reviewer of Allimna Journal.

Articles submitted are reviewed by the editorial team as the initial process. The editorial team will evaluate the feasibility of the content, focus, and methodology in the article. The articles are then sent to one reviewer at the position of Double Review. Notes from the reviewer were then sent back to the author to be adapted to the standards of journal writing. The decision of the revised manuscript will be re-evaluated in the editorial board's meeting. Later, the decision of the editor in the final meeting will be informed to the author.

Editor of Allimna responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted must be published. Validation of these works and their importance for researchers and readers should always push the decision. The editor can be guided by a policy board of editors of the journal and is limited by law as to be enforced regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism (plagiarism). Editors can confer with other editors or the assessment team in making this decision