The Profile of Efl Learners As Measured By An English Proficiency Test

Authors

  • Gunadi Harry Sulistyo Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia
  • Suharyadi Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v5i1.570

Keywords:

English Department students, language proficiency, Proficiency test

Abstract

This study aims at profiling the students’ English proficiency in the Department of English, Universitas Negeri Malang (UM). The English proficiency of 277 students across admission Classes in 2016, 2015, 2014, and 2013 who are involved in the study is measured by using a proficiency test. The subtests reliability was assured and the data was analyzed by using descriptive and inferential statistical analyses. The results show no respondent reached the advanced level; the majority was in the low intermediate level. It indicates that the respondents’ score was not linear with their year of admission classes. However, a linearly increasing average score was respectively observed from the scores of Classes of 2015, 2014, and 2013. Statistical differences in the mean scores of the students across admission classes were observed. Next, no evidence of statistical differences was observed in the mean score of the students across different study programs in their seventh semester. Finally, none of Class of 2013 exactly met the graduate profile. However, those beyond the profile and those below the profile were marginally comparable. These findings were further discussed.

References

Rakhmadi, A. & Nurrohmah, R. 2009. Evaluasi pengaruh pembelajaran berbasis Web untuk Bahasa Inggris sesi Structure and Written Expression. Seminar Nasional Informatika (SEMNASIF), UPN Veteran Yogyakarta, 23 Mei 2009. Accessed fromi http://jurnal.upnyk.ac.id/index.php/semnasif/article/view/929 on December 27, 2016.

Robb, T.N. & Ercanbrack, J. 1999. A study of the effect of direct test preparation on the TOEIC scores of Japanese university students. TESL-EJ. Volume 3, Number 4. Accessed from http://www.tesl-ej.org/wordpress/issues/volume3/ej12/ej12a2/ on December 16, 2016.

Salehi, M. & Sanjareh, H.B. 2003. The impact of response format on learners’ test performance of grammaticality judgment tests. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research. 3(2) pp. 1335-1345.

Sharpe, P.J. 2015 Barron’s Practice Exercises for the TOEFL, 8th Edition. New York: Barron’s Educational Series, Inc.

Stoynoff, S. 1997. Factors associated with international students’ academic achievement. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 24(1), pp. 56–68.

Sucahyo, S.A. 2016. Peta nilai TOEFL mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Institut Agama Islam Negeri Samarinda. Fenomena, Volume 8, No 1, 101 – 109

Sulistyo, G.H. 2001. Several Technical Considerations for Taking the (Paper-and-Pencil-Based) TOEFL Test. TEFLIN Journal, Volume XII, pp. 223-241.

Tavakoli, H. 2012. A Dictionary of Research Methodology and Statistics in Applied Linguistics. Tehran: Rahnama Press.

Tjetje, N.F. & Wulaningrum, R. 2012. Hubungan antara lama waktu pembelajaran dan kemampuan Bahasa Inggris Mahasiswa Jurusan Akuntansi Politeknik Negeri Samarinda. Jurnal Eksis Vol.8 No.2, Agustus 2012, pp. 2168 – 2357.

Wait, I.W. & Gressel, J.W. 2009. Relationship between TOEFL score and academic success for international engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), pp. 389–398.

Wendt, A. & Woo, A. 2009. A Minimum English Proficiency Standard for the Test of English as a Foreign Language Internet-Based Test (TOEFL iBT). Chicago, Il.: National Council of State Boards of Nursing, Inc. (NCSBN).

Downloads

Published

2022-05-18

How to Cite

Sulistyo, G. H. ., & Suharyadi. (2022). The Profile of Efl Learners As Measured By An English Proficiency Test. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 5(1), 115–145. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v5i1.570