Analysis of Experimental Physics Publications for Teaching Over the Past Decade (2015-2024)

Fadhil Muddasir; Hilarius Donatus Hun; Jubaedah; Yeheskel Sorpay; Widayani; Triyanta

Authors

Fadhil Muddasir Master Program of Physics Teaching, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung
Hilarius Donatus Hun Master Program of Physics Teaching, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung
Jubaedah Master Program of Physics Teaching, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung
Yeheskel Sorpay Master Program of Physics Teaching, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung
Widayani Nuclear Physics and Biophysics Research Group, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung
Triyanta Theoretical High Energy Physics Research Group, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Institut Teknologi Bandung

Keywords:

Augmented reality, Experimental physics, Modern physics, Physics education, Thermodynamics

Abstract

Physics experiments play a crucial role in fostering student engagement, serving as a foundation for active learning and critical skill development. Experiments provide hands-on experiences that help students develop problem-solving abilities, scientific reasoning, and collaborative skills. Understanding the trends in experimental physics publications for teaching is essential to assess how this field evolves and to identify research gaps. This study examines the publication trends of experimental physics research for teaching over the past decade (2015–2024) by analyzing 2352 articles from prominent journals, including Physics Education, The Physics Teacher, European Journal of Physics, and American Journal of Physics. The results highlight notable peaks in publication during key periods, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, which accelerated innovation in virtual and remote experimental setups. Mechanics emerged as the most frequently researched topic, while thermodynamics and modern physics were underrepresented, suggesting significant research gaps. The analysis also identifies the transformative potential of technological advancements like smartphone-based tools and augmented reality, which have significantly enhanced teaching methodologies. This study underscores the need for collaborative efforts among researchers, educators, and policymakers to develop accessible, scalable, and innovative experimental approaches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cahill, G. (2024). A low-cost and simple webcam spectrometer for exploring the visible wavelengths of light. Physics Education, 59(5), 053001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ad5d45

Hestenes, D. (2010). Modeling theory for math and science education. In R. Lesh, P. L. Galbraith, C. R. Haines, & A. Hurford (Eds.), Modeling students’ mathematical modeling competencies (pp. 13–41). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-0561-1_3

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020, March 27). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Huda, M. (2017). Meningkatkan kemampuan memecahkan masalah matematis siswa MAN Babat melalui strategi pembelajaran eksploratif. In PRISMA: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika (pp. 114–123). Universitas Negeri Semarang. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/prisma/article/view/21626

Juraini, J., Taufik, M., & Gunada, I. W. (2017). Pengaruh model pembelajaran kooperatif tipe STAD (Student Team Achievement Division) dengan metode eksperimen terhadap keterampilan proses sains dan hasil belajar fisika pada siswa SMA Negeri 1 Labuapi tahun pelajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Dan Teknologi, 2(2), 80–85. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpft.v2i2.293

Knight, R. D. (2002). Five easy lessons: Strategies for successful physics teaching. Pearson Education (Addison-Wesley).

Kurnia, B., Amiruddin, M. Z. B., Suprapto, N., Alan, U., & Cheng, T.-H. (2022). The trend of physics education research during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(3), 517–533. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.3.517

Pyatt, K., & Sims, R. (2012). Virtual and physical experimentation in inquiry-based science labs: Attitudes, performance and access. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(1), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9291-6

Rerung, N., Sinon, I. L. S., & Widyaningsih, S. W. (2017). Penerapan model pembelajaran problem based learning (PBL) untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar peserta didik SMA pada materi usaha dan energi. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika Al-Biruni, 6(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.24042/jipfalbiruni.v6i1.597

Staacks, S., Hütz, S., Heinke, H., & Stampfer, C. (2018). Advanced tools for smartphone-based experiments: Phyphox. Physics Education, 53(4), 045009. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/aac05e

Strzys, M. P., Kapp, S., Thees, M., Klein, P., Lukowicz, P., Knierim, P., Schmidt, A., & Kuhn, J. (2018). Physics holo.lab learning experience: Using smartglasses for augmented reality labwork to foster the concepts of heat conduction. European Journal of Physics, 39(3), 035203. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/aaa8fb

Subekti, Y., & Ariswan, A. (2016). Pembelajaran fisika dengan metode eksperimen untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar kognitif dan keterampilan proses sains. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 2(2), 252. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v2i2.6278