Toward a Cognitive Architecture of Human–AI Collaboration in AI-Assisted Translation

Authors

  • Nur Mutmainna Halim English Literature Study Program, Universitas Negeri Makassar
  • Abd Halim English Literature Study Program, Universitas Negeri Makassar

Keywords:

AI-Assisted Translation; Distributed Cognition; Higher Education; Metacognitive Monitoring; Qualitative Multiple Case Study

Abstract

The growing adoption of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in higher education has transformed translation from an individual cognitive activity into a collaborative process in which learners continuously interact with intelligent technologies. Although AI-assisted translation has received increasing scholarly attention, existing research has primarily focused on translation quality, technology acceptance, and ethical issues, offering limited understanding of the cognitive processes underlying human–AI collaboration during translation. This study investigates the cognitive architecture of AI-assisted translation by examining how cognitive work is distributed between learners and AI, how learners regulate AI-generated outputs, and how they reconstruct translations while maintaining human agency. A qualitative multiple case study was conducted with five undergraduate students enrolled in a Translating General Text course in the English Literature Study Program at Universitas Negeri Makassar, Indonesia. Data were collected through AI-assisted translation tasks, classroom observations, and semi-structured interviews and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. The findings reveal three interconnected cognitive dimensions. First, distributed cognitive processing enables AI to support lexical retrieval, semantic interpretation, and syntactic reformulation during translation. Second, metacognitive regulation allows learners to evaluate, accept, modify, reject, and regenerate AI-generated outputs according to contextual and semantic requirements. Third, human reconstruction demonstrates that learners integrate AI-generated suggestions with their own linguistic knowledge to produce coherent and contextually appropriate translations. Cross-case analysis further indicates that AI-assisted translation operates as a recursive human–AI cognitive system in which cognitive resources are shared while executive control remains with the learner. The study proposes an empirical cognitive architecture integrating distributed cognition and metacognitive regulation, extending current understandings of human–AI collaboration in translation education and providing pedagogical implications for fostering critical judgment, learner autonomy, and responsible AI integration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Belkina, M., Daniel, S., Nikolic, S., Haque, R., Lyden, S., Neal, P., Grundy, S., & Hassan, G. M. (2025). Implementing generative AI (GenAI) in higher education: A systematic review of case studies. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100407. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100407

Bozkurt, A., Xiao, J., Farrow, R., Bai, J. Y. H., Nerantzi, C., Moore, S., Dron, J., Stracke, C. M., Singh, L., & Crompton, H. (2024). The manifesto for teaching and learning in a time of generative AI: A critical collective stance to better navigate the future. In Open Praxis (Vol. 16, Number 4, pp. 487–513). International Council for Open and Distance Education Oslo, Norway. https://doi.org/10.55982/openpraxis.16.4.777

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238

Chan, R. Y.-Y., Chan, C. K. Y., Jong, M. S.-Y., Hu, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2024). WIP: Engineering Class Students’ Epistemic Cognition When Interacting With Generative AI. 2024 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE61694.2024.10892939

Creely, E. (2024). Exploring the role of generative AI in enhancing language learning: Opportunities and challenges. International Journal of Changes in Education, 1(3), 158–167. https://doi.org/10.47852/bonviewIJCE42022495

Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing paradigms in qualitative research. Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2(163–194), 105.

Guo, Y., & Lin, Z. (2025). Generative AI as a Catalyst for Data-Driven Learning: Efficacy, Equity, and Engagement in Translation Education. Sage Open, 15(4), 21582440251406100. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251406099

Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. MIT press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001

Jung, Y., & Jin, S.-H. (2025). Questioning the role of AI as collaborator: a systematic literature review of generative AI-supported knowledge construction. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2025.2556808

Kwok, H. L., Shi, Y., Xu, H., Li, D., & Liu, K. (2025). GenAI as a translation assistant? A corpus-based study on lexical and syntactic complexity of GPT-post-edited learner translation. System, 130, 103618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2025.103618

Lee, A. V. Y., Tan, S. C., & Teo, C. L. (2023). Designs and practices using generative AI for sustainable student discourse and knowledge creation. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 59. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00279-1

Li, L., Li, J., Islam, N., Zhang, J. Z., & Behl, A. (2025). Empowering firms with AI-generated content: Strategic approaches to R&D and advertising in the era of generative AI. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2025.3552142

Nelson, T. O. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 26, pp. 125–173). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.

Stake, R. E., & Schwandt, T. A. (2006). On discerning quality in evaluation. The Sage Handbook of Evaluation, 404–418. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608078.n18

Wang, Q. (2025). Evaluating Uighur literary translation: A comparative study of ChatGPT, Google Translate, and Bing Translator. PLoS One, 20(10), e0335261. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0335261

Wang, W., & Lyu, C. (2025). The Effectiveness of Production-Oriented Approach on Students’ English Language Skills: A Meta-Analysis: W. Wang, C. Lyu. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 34(5), 1763–1780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-025-00990-2

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-08

How to Cite

Halim, N. M., & Halim, A. (2026). Toward a Cognitive Architecture of Human–AI Collaboration in AI-Assisted Translation. Proceeding International Conference on Education, 587–602. Retrieved from https://jurnalfaktarbiyah.iainkediri.ac.id/index.php/proceedings/article/view/9594