Navigating The Nuances of Cultural Diplomacy: A Decolonial Case Study of Pre-Service Teachers’ Multicultural Capital in Bipa Instruction
Keywords:
Decolonizing Pedagogy; BIPA Instruction; Local Wisdom; Critical Case Study; Pre-Service TeachersAbstract
Traditional foreign language pedagogy often traps pre-service teachers within rigid structural frameworks, isolating grammar mechanics from rich cultural realities. In Teaching Indonesian as a Foreign Language (BIPA), there is an urgent need to decolonize this approach. Leveraging future educators' multicultural backgrounds can transform BIPA classrooms into decentralized, pluralistic spaces for cultural diplomacy. This critical case study investigates how ethnically diverse pre-service teachers execute the integration of Nusantara cultural assets into modern BIPA teaching frameworks to avoid rigid, textbook-bound instruction. A qualitative critical case study was conducted involving 100 pre-service teachers from various Indonesian regions (Sumatra, Java, Kalimantan, Sulawesi) enrolled in the BIPA pedagogy course at Universitas Sriwijaya. Data were gathered through teaching portfolios, localized lesson plans, reflective journals, and semi-structured focus group discussions, followed by critical thematic analysis. The study revealed five prominent dimensions of localized pedagogical integration engineered by the participants: (1) Cross-Regional Ethnolinguistic Integration: replacing sterile grammar drills with regional oral traditions and folktales to teach indirect communication styles; (2) Material Materialization: transforming physical cultural heritage (e.g., Songket, Batik, traditional architectures) into advanced descriptive reading and vocabulary lessons; (3) Pluralistic Gastronomic Pedagogy: utilizing diverse culinary philosophies (e.g., Pempek, Rendang) to teach procedural texts and temporal adverbs contextualized in regional histories; (4) Multi-Ethnic Performing Arts: incorporating regional music and dances (e.g., Saman dance, puppetry) to lower foreign learners' affective filters; and (5) Pedagogical Tension: experiencing severe psychological friction and institutional dependency due to clashes between fluid, localized decolonial practices and rigid national standardized competency guidelines (SKKNI). For recommendation, BIPA teacher preparation programs must shift from structural linguistic models toward culturally-sustained, decentralized frameworks. Institutions should offer flexible curricular spaces that allow future educators to leverage their indigenous cultural capital alongside structured opportunities for practical teaching exposure with actual foreign learners.
Downloads
References
Alwasilah, A. C. (2014). Policy on foreign language education in Indonesia. International Journal of Pedagogy and Teacher Education, 1(1), 21–34.
Anindita, W. D., & Sukamto, K. (2020). Pembelajaran bahasa berbasis budaya bagi penutur asing (BIPA): Peluang dan tantangan. Jurnal Bahasa Lingua Scientia, 12(2), 245–260.
Arif, M., & Suyanto, S. (2020). Gastronomic pedagogy: Exploring traditional cuisine as a tool for language and cultural learning. Journal of Ethnic Foods, 7(1), 12–21.
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage Publications.
Darwis, M., Suhari, A., & Professional, T. (2021). Standardisasi kompetensi pengajar BIPA berdasarkan SKKNI: Peluang dan tantangan inovasi pedagogi. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, 21(1), 45–58.
García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translarguaging: Language, bilingualism and education. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hidayat, R. (2019). South Sumatran oral traditions and their pedagogical values in language classrooms. Lingua: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 15(2), 101–112.
Kramsch, C. (2014). Language and culture. AILA Review, 27(1), 30–55.
Kubota, R. (2016). The multi/plural turn, postcolonial theory, and neoliberal multiculturalism: Complicities and implications for ELT. Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 474–494.
Kusmiatun, A. (2016). Mengenal BIPA (Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing) dan Pembelajarannya. K निरंतर.
Macedo, D. (2019). Decolonizing foreign language education: The misteachings of English and other colonial languages. Routledge.
Motha, S. (2014). Race, empire, and English language teaching: Creating responsible and ethical anti-racist pedagogy. Teachers College Press.
Muliastuti, L. (2017). Bahasa Indonesia bagi Penutur Asing: Acuan Teoretis dan Praktis Pembelajaran. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.
Muyaka, S., & Puspitasari, D. (2022). Challenges and anxieties of pre-service teachers in teaching Indonesian to foreign learners. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(2), 312–325.
Osborn, T. A. (2006). Teaching world languages for social justice: A sourcebook of principles and practices. Routledge.
Saddhono, K. (2015). Integrating local culture in Indonesian language teaching for foreign learners: A case study in Indonesian universities. Silpakorn University Journal of Social Sciences, Humanities, and Arts, 15(2), 77–87.
Setyonegoro, A., Wahyuni, S., & Utama, P. (2023). Folklore and regional idioms as innovative materials for teaching BIPA. Kajian Linguistik dan Sastra, 8(1), 89–104.
Suharti, S., & Wardani, N. E. (2018). Integrating Nusantara textiles and material culture into language teaching portfolios. Jurnal Komunitas, 10(2), 210–222.
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Sage Publications.
Zein, S. (2017). Professional development of teachers of English as a foreign language in Indonesia: A socio-cultural computer-mediated communication perspective. Professional Development in Education, 43(2), 166–187.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Hani Atus Sholikhah, Chrisnatama Tangguh Prasetyo, Khalidatun Nuzula, Astrid Yulinda Putri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.





