Oral Peer Feedback in A Flipped Speaking Job Interview Class: Practice And Learners’ Attitudes

Authors

  • Sumardi Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Khairani Dian Anisa Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
  • Lailatun Nurul Aniq Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v7i2.2001

Keywords:

flipped classroom, oral peer feedback, students' attitudes, vocational high school

Abstract

Since flipped learning facilitates student-centered approach, it is necessary to administer such assessment which involves students’ participation. As the assessment as learning, peer feedback facilitates students to offer and receive comments from their peers. The present study aimed at investigating the practice and students’ voices of peer feedback in their flipped speaking job interview class. Twelfth graders of a state vocational high school in Indonesia (n=30) participated in this case study. The data gathered from the result of observation, student questionnaire, and semi-structured interview. The study indicated that students had a positive attitude toward peer feedback. It fostered more interaction with peers resulting in a more dynamic atmosphere. Moreover, students perceived peer feedback as a useful activity to locate their errors and learn strategies to soften their comments. The study serves as a guideline for applying peer feedback in the speaking area utilizing flipped instruction.

References

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. International Society for Technology in Education.

Cao, Z., Yu, S., & Huang, J. (2019). A qualitative inquiry into undergraduates’ learning from giving and receiving peer feedback in L2 writing: Insights from a case study. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 63(2019), 102–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.08.001

Carson, J. G., & Nelson, G. L. (1996). Chinese students’ perceptions of ESL peer response group interaction. Journal of Second Language Writing, 5(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(96)90012-0

Chen Hsieh, J. S., Wu, W. C. V., & Marek, M. W. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(1–2), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2015.1111910

Chien, S. Y., Hwang, G. J., & Jong, M. S. Y. (2020). Effects of peer assessment within the context of spherical video-based virtual reality on EFL students’ English-Speaking performance and learning perceptions. Computers and Education, 146(2020), 103751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103751

Choe, E., & Seong, M.-H. (2016). A case study of the flipped classroom in a Korean university general English course. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 20(2), 71–93. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1129484

Chuang, H. H., Weng, C. Y., & Chen, C. H. (2018). Which students benefit most from a flipped classroom approach to language learning? British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(1), 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12530

de Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (2000). Activating the ZPD: Mutual scaffolding in L2 peer revision. The Modern Language Journal, 84(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/0026-7902.00052

Defour, M. (2013). ‘Flipped classrooms’ spreading in Wisconsin. Community College Week, 25(16), 10. http://connection.ebscohost.com/

Earl, L.M. (2003). Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Corwin Press, Inc.

Flick, U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research (4th ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.

Goodwin, B. & Miller, K. (2013). Evidence on flipped classrooms is still coming in. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 78-80. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar13/vol70/num06/Evidence-on-Flipped-Classrooms-Is-Still-Coming-In.aspx

Han, Y. (2015). Successfully flipping the ESL classroom for learner autonomy. NYS TESOL Journal, 2(1), 98–109. http://journal.nystesol.org/nystj_vol2_1.html

Hansen, J. G., & Liu, J. (2005). Guiding principles for effective peer response. ELT Journal, 59(1), 31–38. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/cci004

Hao, Y. (2016). Middle school students’ flipped learning readiness in foreign language classrooms: Exploring its relationship with personal characteristics and individual circumstances. Computers in Human Behavior, 59(2016), 295–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.01.031

Hu, G. (2005). Using peer review with Chinese ESL student writers. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 321–342. https://doi.org/10.1191/1362168805lr169oa

Hung, Y. J., Samuelson, B. L., & Chen, S. C. (2016). Relationships between peer-and self-assessment and teacher assessment of young EFL learners' oral presentations. In M. Nikolov (Ed.), Assessing young learners of English: Global and local perspective (Vol.25, 317-338). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-22422-0

Hyland, F. (2000). ESL writers and feedback: Giving more autonomy to students. Language Teaching Research, 4(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/136216880000400103

Jenkins, M. (2005). Unfulfilled Promise: formative assessment using computer-aided assessment. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, 1(1), 67–80. http://eprints.glos.ac.uk/3610/

Köroğlu, Z. Ç., & Çakır, A. (2017). Implementation of flipped instruction in language classrooms : An alternative way to develop speaking skills of pre-service English language teachers International Journal of Education and Development, 13(2), 42–55. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1153321

Lee, I. (2017). Classroom Writing Assessment and Feedback in L2 School Contexts. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3924-9

Lee, M. K. (2015). Peer feedback in second language writing: Investigating junior secondary students’ perspectives on inter-feedback and intra-feedback. System, 55(2015), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.08.003

Mendonça, C. O., Johnson, K. E., & Mendonca, C. O. (1994). Peer review negotiations: revision activities in ESL writing instruction. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 745. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587558

Merriam, S.B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis a methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Min, H. T. (2006). The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 15(2), 118–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003

Russell, V. (2009). Corrective feedback, over a decade of research since Lyster and Ranta (1997): Where do we stand today. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6(1), 21–31. https://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/archive/v6n12009.html

Sams, A. & Bergmann, J. (2013). Flip your students’ learning. Educational Leadership, 70(6), 16-20. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/mar13/vol70/num06/Flip-Your-Students'-Learning.aspx

Springen, K. (2013). Flipped: A revolutionary approach to learning presents pros and cons for educators. School Library Journal, 59(4), 23-26. https://www.slj.com/?detailStory=flipping-the-classroom-a-revolutionary-approach-to-learning-presents-some-pros-and-cons

Strijbos, J. W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010). Unravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002

Tian, L., & Li, L. (2019). Chinese EFL learners’ perception of peer oral and written feedback as providers, receivers and observers. Language Awareness, 27(4), 312–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2018.1535602

Topping, K. J. (2009). Peer assessment. Theory into Practice, 48(1), 20–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802577569

Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000). Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments? Journal of Second Language Writing, 9(2), 147–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00022-9

Turan, Z., & Akdag-Cimen, B. (2019). Flipped classroom in English language teaching: A systematic review. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(7), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1584117

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, N., Chen, J., Tai, M., & Zhang, J. (2019). Blended learning for Chinese university EFL learners: Learning environment and learner perceptions. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2019.1607881

Wang, W. (2014). Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry. Assessing Writing, 19(2014), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.008

Wu, W. C. V., Hsieh, J. S. C., & Yang, J. C. (2017). Creating an online learning community in a flipped classroom to enhance efl learners’ oral proficiency. Educational Technology and Society, 20(2), 142–157. https://www.j-ets.net/collection/published-issues/20_2

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Yu, S. (2019). Learning from giving peer feedback on postgraduate theses: Voices from Master’s students in the Macau EFL context. Assessing Writing, 40(2019), 42–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2019.03.004

Downloads

Published

2020-11-25

How to Cite

Sumardi, Anisa, K. D. ., & Aniq, L. N. . (2020). Oral Peer Feedback in A Flipped Speaking Job Interview Class: Practice And Learners’ Attitudes. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 7(2), 245–268. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v7i2.2001

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2020): JEELS November 2020

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2020 JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies)

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.