Donald Trump’s and Hillary Clinton’s Interruptions In Presidential Debates

Authors

  • Zuliati Rohmah UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
  • Alda Fitriani Suwandi Universitas Airlangga Surabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v8i1.2359

Keywords:

interruption, presidential debate, Donald Trump, Hillary Clinton

Abstract

The present research aims to investigate the types and functions of interruptions of Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton during the US presidential debates in 2016. Data collected from Donald Trump's and Hillary Clinton's speech in the debates were transcribed and analyzed to find types and functions of interruptions by both of the candidates. The results of the Conversational Analysis display that Donald Trump dominates the interruptions by applying a substantially greater number of interruptions consisting three different types of interruptions. Butting-in Interruptions were applied by both as the biggest number of interruptions. Data analysis also demonstrates that intrusive functions appear much more frequently compared to the collaborative functions of interruptions applied by the male and female presidential candidates. Discussion as to why such phenomena are noticeable in the data concludes the paper.

References

Anggraini, N. (2018). Transitivity process and ideological construction of Donald Trump’s speeches. Thesis: UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya.

Anindya, H.A.A. (2014). Conversational interruption in Oprah Winfrey show Will Smith and family interview episode. Thesis: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Atkinson, J. M. & Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Beattie, G. W. (1982). Turn- taking and interruption in political interviews: Margaret Thatcher and Jim Callaghan compared and contrasted. Semiotica. 39, 93-114.

Benoit, W. L. (2007). Communication in political campaigns. New York: Peter Lang.

Cantrell, L. (2014). The Power of rapport: an analysis of the effects of interruptions and overlaps in casual conversation. Innervate. 6, 74-85.

Faizah, I. & Kurniawan, E. (2016). A study of interruption and overlap in male- female conversations in the talk show Mata Najwa. Barista. 3(1), 25- 36.

Freeley, A.J. & Steinberg, D.L. (2009). Argumentation and debate: Critical thinking for reasoned decision making. 12th Ed. New York: Wadsworth.

Haris, W. & Mirahayuni, N.K. (2010). A critical discourse analysis of conversation control strategies used at metro tv in Kick Andy show. Parafrase. 10(2), 1-11.

Heritage, J. & Atkinson, J.M. (1984). Introduction. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 1-15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hutchby, I. & Wooffit, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principle, practices, and applications. Cambridge: Blackwell Publisher, Ltd.

Ismaliyah, N. (2015). Conversational analysis of turn taking mechanism in Piers Morgan tonight talk show. Thesis: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Jannah, H.L.I. (2014). Conversational analysis of turn- taking in “The Social Network†Film. Thesis: UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang.

Kennedy, C.W., & Camden, C. T. (1983). A new look at interruption. Western Journal of Speech Communication. 47, 45-58.

Lakoff, R. (1975). Language and woman’s place. New York: Harper Colophon.

Larasati, C.K. (2014). A conversation analysis of interruptions in modern family season 1 series. Thesis: Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. London: Cambridge University Press.

Li, H.Z. (2001). Cooperative and intrusive interruptions in inter- and intra-cultural dyadic discourse. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. 20(3), 259- 284.

Murata, K. (1994). Intrusive or cooperative? A cross- cultural study of interruption. Journal of Pragmatics. 21, 385- 400.

Octaviani, H. (2014). An analysis of the strengths of arguments of the 2012 United States’s presidential debate: The case of Barrack Obama and Mitt Romney. Thesis: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Putra, A.A. (2016). Power relation on Donald Trump’s political campaign 2015. Thesis: UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang.

Sack, H. (1984). Notes on methodology. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 21-27). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sacks, H., Schegloff,E. A.,& Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn- taking in conversation. Language, 50, 697-735.

Schegloff, E. A. (1984). On some questions and ambiguities in conversation. In J.M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 28-52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shabrina, I. (2016). Persuasive strategies used in Hillary Clinton’s political campaign speech. Thesis: UIN Maulana Malik Ibrahim Malang.

Wei, L. (2002). 'What do you want me to say?' On the conversation analysis approach to bilingual interaction. Language and Society, 31, 159-180.

Xu, Y. (2009). Gender differences in mixed-sex conversations: A Study of Interruptions. Kristianstad : Kristianstad University.

Zimmerman, D. H.,& West, C. (1975). Sex, roles, interruptions, and silences in conversations. In B. Thorne & N. Henley (Eds.), Language and sex: Difference and dominance (pp. 105-129). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-19

How to Cite

Rohmah, Z. ., & Suwandi, A. F. . (2021). Donald Trump’s and Hillary Clinton’s Interruptions In Presidential Debates. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 8(1), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v8i1.2359