The Effect of Group-Individual Collaborative Testing on Primary Students’ Achievement in Reading Test

Authors

  • Yuliyanto Chandra Widya Mandala Surabaya Catholic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v11i1.2630

Keywords:

collaborative testing, cooperative learning, group-individual, reading achievement, primary students

Abstract

Collaborative testing—a two-stage testing modality in which students do tests as a group and individually—has been extensively researched and found to improve learning. However, most collaborative testing research has focused on non-English language learning. Therefore, this study examines the effects of group-individual collaborative testing (GICT) on English reading test achievement and student views of GICT. This sequential explanatory mixed-methods study gathered quantitative data from both treatment and control groups, primarily comprising students' correct answers, followed by qualitative insights derived from students' reflections on their learning experiences. Quantitative data demonstrates that GICT had a significant effect on students' reading achievement tests. While the qualitative data reveals that students considered GICT was a good reading testing modality, with some notes on the scoring method. Practice and research implications include 1) using GICT to test other language skills, 2) diversifying group composition, 3) giving more weight to the individual part score because students will retrieve more information during this stage, and 4) instilling collaborative learning values before testing.

References

Amjadi, A., & Talebi, S. H. (2024). Extending the efficacy of Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) in teaching reading strategies: A socio-cultural emotional perspective. Language Teaching Research, 28(2), 714-748. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211011501

Andrade, C. (2021). The inconvenient truth about convenience and purposive samples. Indian Journal of Psychological Medicine, 43(1), 86–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0253717620977000

Antoniou, A. (2019). Compatibility of small team personalities in computer-based tasks. Challenges, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe10010029

Babapour, M., Ahangari, S., & Ahour, T. (2019). The effect of shadow reading and collaborative strategic reading on EFL learners’ reading comprehension across two proficiency levels. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(4), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2018.1465059

Bećirović, S., Dubravac, V., & Brdarević-Čeljo, A. (2022). Cooperative learning as a pathway to strengthening motivation and improving achievement in an EFL classroom. SAGE Open, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221078016

Butler, Y. G., Peng, X., & Lee, J. (2021). Young learners’ voices: Towards a learner-centered approach to understanding language assessment literacy. Language Testing, 38(3), 429–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532221992274

Caboral-Stevens, M., & Fox, D. P. (2020). The use of collaborative testing with baccalaureate nursing students. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 15(1), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.teln.2019.09.007

Cantwell, E. R., Sousou, J., Jadotte, Y. T., Pierce, J., & Akioyamen, L. E. (2017). Collaborative testing for improving student learning outcomes and test‐taking performance in higher education: a systematic review. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 13(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.186

Crompton, C. J., Wolters, M. K., & MacPherson, S. E. (2022). Learning with friends and strangers: Partner familiarity does not improve collaborative learning performance in younger and older adults. Memory, 30(5), 636–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2022.2041038

De Angelis, G. (2021). Multilingual testing and assessment.

Eastridge, J. A., & Benson, W. L. (2020). Comparing two models of collaborative testing for teaching statistics. Teaching of Psychology, 47(1), 68–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628319888113

Eastwood, J. L., Kleinberg, K. A., & Rodenbaugh, D. W. (2020). Collaborative testing in medical education: Student perceptions and long-term knowledge retention. Medical Science Educator, 30(2), 737–747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-020-00944-x

French, K. A., & Kottke, J. L. (2013). Teamwork satisfaction: Exploring the multilevel interaction of teamwork interest and group extraversion. Active Learning in Higher Education, 14(3), 189–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787413498034

Hard, B. M., & RaoShah, T. (2022). Developing collaborative thinkers: Rethinking how we define, teach, and assess class participation. Teaching of Psychology, 49(2), 176–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628320986953

Jang, H., Lasry, N., Miller, K., & Mazur, E. (2017). Collaborative exams: cheating? or learning? American Journal of Physics, 85(3), 223–227. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.4974744

Jang, J. (2022). Translanguaging as an agentive action: A longitudinal case study of Uzbek EFL learners in South Korea. Tesl-Ej, 26(3), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.26103a6

Jones, T. A. (2019). Effect of collaborative group testing on dental students’ performance and perceived learning in an introductory comprehensive care course. Journal of Dental Education, 83(1), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.21815/jde.019.011

Kapitanoff, S., & Pandey, C. (2018). Collaborative testing in statistics: Group interaction, anxiety, and class performance. Statistics Education Research Journal, 17(2), 51–67. https://doi.org/10.52041/serj.v17i2.158

Khampool, W., & Chumworatayee, T. (2023). Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) instruction and its effects on Thai EAP university learners’ reading comprehension across two proficiency levels. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 16(2), 8–24.

Koutrouba, K., & Karageorgou, E. (2013). Cognitive and socio-affective outcomes of project-based learning: Perceptions of Greek Second Chance School students. Improving Schools, 16(3), 244–260. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480213501062

Lam, R. (2020). Investigating assessment as learning in second language writing: A qualitative research perspective. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920938572

Levine, R. E., Borges, N. J., Roman, B. J. B., Carchedi, L. R., Townsend, M. H., Cluver, J. S., Frank, J., Morey, O., Haidet, P., & Thompson, B. M. (2018). High-stakes collaborative testing: Why not? Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 30(2), 133–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10401334.2017.1365719

LoGiudice, A. B., Pachai, A. A., & Kim, J. A. (2015). Testing together: When do students learn more through collaborative tests? Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology, 1(4), 377–389. https://doi.org/10.1037/stl0000041

Mahoney, J. W., & Harris-Reeves, B. (2019). The effects of collaborative testing on higher order thinking: Do the bright get brighter? Active Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787417723243

McKay, J., & Sridharan, B. (2023). Student perceptions of collaborative group work (CGW) in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2023.2227677

Mende, S., Proske, A., & Narciss, S. (2021). Individual preparation for collaborative learning: Systematic review and synthesis. Educational Psychologist, 56(1), 29–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2020.1828086

Mohan, M. (2020). Use of critical reflection as a research method: A case of research-induced distress? Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 5(1), 19–20. https://doi.org/10.20529/IJME.2020.014

Namaziandost, E., Homayouni, M., & Rahmani, P. (2020). The impact of cooperative learning approach on the development of EFL learners’ speaking fluency. Cogent Arts and Humanities, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311983.2020.1780811

Parlindungan, F., Mursyidin, M., Kurniasih, K., Rahmatillah, R., Nuthihar, R., & Oussou, S. (2023). The effect of collaborative reasoning on Indonesian university students’ literacy and argumentation skills. Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies, 10(9), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v10i1.788

Robinson, L., Harris, A., & Burton, R. (2015). Saving face: Managing rapport in a Problem-Based Learning group. Active Learning in Higher Education, 16(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787415573355

Salomone, M., & Kling, T. (2017). Required peer-cooperative learning improves retention of STEM majors. International Journal of STEM Education, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-017-0082-3

Segundo Marcos, R. I., López Ferández, V., Daza González, M. T., & Phillips-Silver, J. (2020). Promoting children’s creative thinking through reading and writing in a cooperative learning classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100663

Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214–240. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888348

Syafi’i, M. L. (2015). SMART strategy to boost students’ reading comprehension. Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies, 2(1), 100–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v2i1.30

Sylvia, A. M., Shear, P. K., Jastrowski Mano, K. E., Guerin, J. M., & Mano, Q. R. (2023). Test anxiety and reading comprehension: The key role of fluid reasoning. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 36(6), 781–794. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2023.2169677

Walker, C., & Baxter, J. (2019). Method sequence and dominance in mixed methods research: A case study of the social acceptance of wind energy literature. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919834379

Wissman, K. T., & Rawson, K. A. (2018). Collaborative testing for key-term definitions under representative conditions: Efficiency costs and no learning benefits. Memory and Cognition, 46(1), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0752-x

Zheng, Y., & Cheng, L. (2018). How does anxiety influence language performance? From the perspectives of foreign language classroom anxiety and cognitive test anxiety. Language Testing in Asia, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40468-018-0065-4

Zipp, J. F. (2007). Learning by exams: the impact of two-stage cooperative tests. Teaching Sociology, 35(1), 62–76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092055X0703500105

Downloads

Published

2024-04-21

How to Cite

Chandra, Y. (2024). The Effect of Group-Individual Collaborative Testing on Primary Students’ Achievement in Reading Test . JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 11(1), 157–184. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v11i1.2630