Students’ Learning Approaches in The EFL Emergency Online Learning Context

Authors

  • Made Hery Santosa Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
  • Ni Made Ratminingsih Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia
  • Luh Diah Surya Adnyani Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v8i2.3215

Keywords:

students’ learning approach, EFL, emergency online learning

Abstract

Emergency online learning has transformed today’s learning while opening up opportunities and challenges, one of which is learning approach. This study aims to investigate students’ learning approach in the English Education study program in emergency online learning. A mixed-method was employed using two instruments; R-SPQ-2F questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. The results of the instrument check showed that the R-SPQ-2F survey and interview guide were valid (.90) and reliable (α=.88). Calculated using Slovin formula, there were 302 respondents for this study. The survey data were analysed using R-SPQ-2F mean score analysis and interview data were with interactive model analysis. The results of the study indicate that the learning approach of students in the English education study program in the context of emergency learning tends to be deep. The interview results provide important information that the student approach is influenced by several supporting and inhibiting factors. This shows that the student learning approach is dynamic in adjusting to learning process. Policy makers, lecturers, and students need to consider aspects of this learning approach in the current emergency online situation for a more effective and meaningful learning process.

References

Aguliera, E., & Nightengale-Lee, B. (2020). Emergency remote teaching across urban and rural contexts: Perspectives on educational equity. Information and Learning Sciences, 121(5/6), 471–478. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0100

Alismail, H. A., & McGuire, P. (2015). 21st century standards and curriculum: Current research and practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(6), 150–155.

Alizadeh, M. (2016). The impact of motivation on English language learning. International Journal of Research in English Education, 1(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v2n4p123

Aristovnik, A., Keržič, D., Ravšelj, D., Tomaževič, N., & Umek, L. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(20), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208438

Artini, N. N., Santosa, M. H., & Suwastini, N. K. A. (2020). Investigation of current digital divide between University lecturers and students in the English as a Foreign Language context in North Bali. International Journal of Education, 13(2), 113–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/ije.v13i2.23828

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to educational research (D. Ary, L. C. Jacobs, & C. K. Sorensen (eds.); 8th ed.). Cengage Learning.

Atmojo, A. E. P., & Nugroho, A. (2020). EFL Classes Must Go Online! Teaching Activities and Challenges during COVID-19 Pandemic in Indonesia. Register Journal, 13(1), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.18326/rgt.v13i1.49-76

Ausubel, D. P. (1968). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Baeten, M., Kyndt, E., Struyven, K., & Dochy, F. (2010). Using student-centred learning environments to stimulate deep approaches to learning: Factors encouraging or discouraging their effectiveness. Educational Research Review, 5(3), 243–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2010.06.001

Banjar, I. D. A. O. V. J., Santosa, M. H., & Adnyani, L. D. S. (2020). Virtual reality for English learning (M. H. Santosa (ed.)). Nilacakra Publisher.

Biggs, J. (1989). Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching. Higher Education Research & Development, 8(1), 7–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436890080102

Biggs, J. (1998). Assessing student approaches to learning. Australian Psychologist, 23(2), 197–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/00050068808255604

Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Reserach & Development, 18(1), 55–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/0729436990180105

Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung, D. Y. P. (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 7(1), 133–149.

Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i–vi.

Budiarta, I. K., & Santosa, M. H. (2020). TPS-Flipgrid: Transforming EFL speaking class in the 21st century. English Review: Journal of English Education, 9(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25134/erjee.v9i1.3801

Cao, W., Fang, Z., Hou, G., Han, M., Xu, X., Dong, J., & Zheng, J. (2020). The psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China. Psychiatry Research, 287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112934

Case, J., & Marshall, D. (2009). Approaches to learning. In M. Tight, K. H. Mok, J. Huisman, & C. Morphew (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Higher Education. Routledge Falmer.

Chan, C. K. K., & Rao, N. (2010). Revisiting the Chinese learner: Changing contexts, changing education. Springer.

Chaya, P., & Inpin, B. (2020). Effects of Integrating Movie-Based Mobile Learning Instruction for Enhancing Thai University Students’ Speaking Skills and Intercultural Communicative Competence. English Language Teaching, 13(7), 27. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v13n7p27

Cheng, X. (2000). Asian students’ reticence revisited. System, 28(3), 435–446. https://doi.org/0.1016/S0346-251X(00)00015-4

Collie, R. J. (2021). COVID-19 and Teachers’ Somatic Burden, Stress, and Emotional Exhaustion: Examining the Role of Principal Leadership and Workplace Buoyancy. AERA Open, 7(1), 233285842098618. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420986187

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research methods: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed method approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (J. W. Creswell (ed.); 4th edition). Pearson.

Cuthbert, P. F. (2005). The student learning process: Learning styles or learning approaches? Teaching in Higher Education, 10(2), 235–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510420000337972

Dardjowidjojo, S. (2000). English teaching in Indonesia. English Australia Journal, 18(1), 22–23.

Dardjowidjojo, S. (2001). Cultural constraints in the implementation of learner autonomy: The case of Indonesia. Southeast Asian Education, 2(20), 309–322.

Dardjowidjojo, S. (2006). The implementability of western approaches in the eastern societies. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching, 2(1), 1–20.

Dewi, K. S., Santosa, M. H., & Suta, I. P. B. M. (2020). The effect on mobile assisted language learning strategy on higher EFL students’ vocabulary mastery. The Asian EFL Journal, 27(4.5), 102–118.

Dharma, D. S. (1997). Accounting students’ learning conceptions, approaches to learning, and the influence of the learning–teaching context on approaches to learning. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 6(2), 125–146. https://doi.org/10.1080/096392897331532

Dornyei, Z. (1994). Motivation Foreign Language Motivating in Classroom the. The Modern Language Journal, 78(3), 273–284.

Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Motivation in second and foreign language learning. In Language teaching. test01.ippobuk.cv.ua. http://www.test01.ippobuk.cv.ua/images/Motivation.pdf

Education First. (2020). EF English proficiency index: A ranking of 100 countries and regions by English skills. Education First. https://www.ef.sg/epi/

Ellis, R. A. (2006). Investigating the quality of student approaches to using technology in experiences of learning through writing. Computers and Education, 46(4), 371–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2004.08.006

Emilia, O, Bloomfield, L., & Rotem, A. (2012). Measuring students’ approaches to learning in different clinical rotations. BMC Medical Education, 12(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-114

Emilia, O, & Mulholland, H. (1991). Approaches to learning of students in an Indonesian medical school. Medical Education, 25(6), 462–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.1991.tb00098.x

Emilia, O., Bloomfield, L., & Rotem, A. (2012). Measuring students ’ approaches to learning in different clinical rotations. BMC Medical Education, 12(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-12-114

Entwistle, N. (1991). Approaches to learning and perception of the learning environment. Higher Education, 22, 201–204.

Entwistle, N. (2009). Teaching for understanding at university: Deep approaches and distinctive ways of thinking. Palgrave Macmillan.

Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. Croom Helm Ltd.

Entwistle, N., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19, 169–194.

Frisby, B. N., Sexton, B., Buckner, M., Beck, A.-C., & Kaufmann, R. (2018). Peers and instructors as sources of distraction from a cognitive load perspective. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 12(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2018.120206

Gates, B., Myhrvold, N., & Rinearson, P. (1996). The road ahead. Penguin Books.

Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

Hofstede, G. (1986). Cultural differences in teaching and learning. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 10, 301–320. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(86)90015-5

Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. SAGE Publications.

Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014

Howlett, G., & Waemusa, Z. (2018). Digital native/digital immigrant divide: EFL teachers’ mobile device experiences and practice. Contemporary Educational Technology, 9(4), 374–389. https://doi.org/10.30935/cet.471007

Huba, M., & Freed, J. (2000). Learner-centered assessment on college campuses: Shifting the focus from teaching to learning (8th ed.). Pearson.

Huda, M., & Lubis, A. H. (2019). Exploring the implementation of student-centered learning in EFL classrooms: Perspectives from Islamic secondary-school teachers in Indonesia. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(2), 187–201.

Humaero, S. (2019). Respecting and saving face in EFL classroom discourse. Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 257, 137–140.

Hynes, M. (2018). Students-as-producers: Developing valuable student-centered research and learning opportunities. International Journal of Research Studies in Education, 7(4), 1–13.

Ismail, S. (2009). Accounting student’s learning approaches and impact on academic performance. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 6(2), 140–151. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2009.07

Ivone, F. M., Jacobs, G., & Santosa, M. H. (2020). Information and communication technology to help students create their own books the dialogic way. Beyond Words, 8(2), 78–91. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.33508/bw.v8i2.2545

Jagtap, P. (2016). Teachers role as facilitator in learning. Scholarly Research Journal, 3(17), 3903–3905.

Jeffrey, L. M. (2009). Learning orientations: Diversity in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2008.09.004

Jürgens, S., & Emilia, O. (2009). Relationship between learning approach and motivation to learn among Medical students at Universitas Gadjah Mada. Jurnal Pendidikan Kedokteran Dan Profesi Kesehatan Indonesia, 4(1), 26–31.

Keiper, M., White, A., Carlson, C., & Lupinek, J. (2020). Student perceptions on the benefits of Flipgrid in a HyFlex learning environment. Journal of Education for Business, 95(8), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2020.1832431

Kember, D. (1996). The intention to both memorise and understand: Another approach to learning? Higher Education, 31, 341–345.

Khan, S. I. (2017). Critical thinking in a higher education functional English course. European Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.6.1.59

Kivunja, C. (2015). Teaching students to learn and to work well with 21st century skills: Unpacking the career and life skills domain of the new learning paradigm. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 1–11.

Kuhfeld, M., Soland, J., Tarasawa, B., Johnson, A., Ruzek, E., & Liu, J. (2020). Projecting the Potential Impact of COVID-19 School Closures on Academic Achievement. Educational Researcher, 49(8), 549–565. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X20965918

Kuhlthau, C. C., Maniotes, L. K., & Caspari, A. K. (2007). Guided inquiry: Learning in the 21st century. Libraries Unlimited.

Lee, S. W. Y. (2013). Investigating students’ learning approaches, perceptions of online discussions, and students’ online and academic performance. Computers and Education, 68, 345–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2013.05.019

Looi, C.-K., Wong, L.-H., Glahn, C., & Cai, S. (2019). Seamless learning: Perspectives, challenges and opportunities. In C.-K. Looi, L.-H. Wong, C. Glahn, & S. Cai (Eds.), Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429485534-9

Looney, A., Cumming, J., Kleij, F. van Der, & Karen Harris. (2017). Reconceptualising the role of teachers as assessors: Teacher assessment identity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(5), 442–467. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2016.1268090

Malik, M. A., Murtaza, A., & Khan, A. M. (2011). Role of teachers in managing teaching learning situation. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(5), 783–833.

Mansir, F., & Karim, A. (2020). Islamic education learning approaches in shaping students’ emotional intelligence in the digital age. Hayula: Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Is, 4(1), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.21009/004.01.04

Marcellino, M. (2008). English language teaching in Indonesia: A continuous challenge in education and cultural diversity. TEFLIN Journal: A Publication on the Teaching and Learning of English, 19(1), 57–69. http://journal.teflin.org/index.php/teflin/article/view/15

Marton, F., & Säljo, R. (1976). On qualitative differences in learning - I: Outcome and process. British Journal of Psychology, 46(1), 4–11.

Marton, F., & Säljo, R. (1984). Approaches to learning. In F. Marton, D. J. Hounsell, & N. J. Entwistle (Eds.), The experience of learning (pp. 36–55). Scottish Academic Press.

Mehta, S. R., & Al-Mahrooqi, R. (2015). Can thinking be taught? Linking critical thinking and writing in an EFL context. RELC Journal, 46(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214555356

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Miller, A. N., Sellnow, D. D., & Strawser, M. G. (2020). Pandemic pedagogy challenges and opportunities: Instruction communication in remote, HyFlex, and BlendFlex courses. Communication Education, 70(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2020.1857418

Mishra, P., & Mehta, R. (2017). What we educators get wrong about 21st-century learning: Results of a survey. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 33(1), 6–19. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2016.1242392

Mok, K. H., Xiong, W., Ke, G., & Cheung, J. O. W. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on international higher education and student mobility: Student perspectives from mainland China and Hong Kong. International Journal of Educational Research, 105(November 2020), 101718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101718

Moorhouse, B. L. (2020). Adaptations to a face-to-face initial teacher education course ‘forced’ online due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1755205

Murati, R. (2015). The role of the teacher in the educational process. The Online Journal of New Horizon in Education, 5(2), 75–78.

On, L. W. (1996). The cultural context for Chinese learner: Conceptions of learning in the Confucian tradition. In D. A. Watkins & J. B. Biggs (Eds.), The Chinese Learner: Cultural, Psychological, and Contextual Influences (pp. 25–41). Comparative Education Research Centre/Australian Council for Educational Research.

Permana, I. K. A. P. A., Santosa, M. H., & Dewi, K. S. (2021). Virtual reality-based learning in action (M. H. Santosa (ed.); 1st ed.). Nilacakra Publisher.

Piirto, J. (2011). Creativity for 21st century skills: How to embed creativity into the curriculum. In J. Piirto (Ed.), Creativity for 21st Century Skills. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6091-463-8

Prieto, A. J. (1992). A method for translation of instruments to other languages. Adult Education Quarterly, 43(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713692043001001

Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. Routledge.

Rayens, W., & Ellis, A. (2018). Creating a student-centered learning environment online. Journal of Statistics Education, 26(2), 92–102.

Santosa, M. H. (2013). An investigation into the relationship between students’ approaches to learning and learning outcomes in an Indonesian English-learning context (Issue July) [La Trobe University]. http://arrow.latrobe.edu.au:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/latrobe:37301

Santosa, M. H. (2017). Learning approaches of Indonesian EFL Gen Z students in a flipped learning context. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 7(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v7i2.689

Santosa, M. H. (2018). Investigating students’ approaches to learning in an EFL blended learning context. In L. P. Artini (Ed.), Current Issues in English Education, Linguistics, and Literature (1st ed., pp. 36–58). PT RajaGrafindo Persada.

Santosa, M. H. (2019). Introduction to Core Skills and its best practices in the Indonesian classrooms. In M. H. Santosa (Ed.), Penerapan Core Skills di kelas-kelas di Indonesia (1st ed., Vol. 1, pp. 07–23). Azizah Publishing.

Santosa, M. H. (2021). Hyflex: Belajar di konteks hibrida dan fleksibel dengan teknologi. In G. Jati & F. Dewi (Eds.), Teknologi dan pembelajaran bahasa Inggris (1st ed., pp. 56–90). Perkumpulan Pengajar Bahasa Berbasis Teknologi Informasi (iTELL).

Santosa, M. H., & Agustino, E. (2020). E-Learning-mediated instruction: Preparing innovative and work ready English materials for Nursing Assistant students. Pedagogy: Journal of English Language Teaching, 8(2), 149–158. https://doi.org/10.32332/pedagogy.v8i2.2037

Santosa, M. H., & Priyanti, N. W. I. (2021). The effect of mobile-assisted language learning “Quizizz” on High School students’ reading comprehension in the English learning context. In F. A. Hamied (Ed.), Literacies, Culture, and Society towards Industrial Revolution 4.0: Reviewing Policies, Expanding Research, Enriching Practices in Asia (1st ed.). Nova Science Publishers.

Smith, R., Kuchah, K., & Lamb, M. (2018). Learner autonomy in developing countries. In A. Chik, N. Aoki, & R. Smith (Eds.), Autonomy in Language Learning and Teaching. Springer.

Taher, A. M. M. H., & Jin, C. (2011). Assessing learning approaches of Chinese local MBA students: An investigation using the Revised Two- factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F). Educational Research and Reviews, 6(19), 974–978. https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR11.152

Tarrayo, V. N., Paz, R. M. O., & Jr, E. C. G. (2021). The shift to flexible learning amidst the pandemic : the case of English language teachers in a Philippine state university. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, Online Fir. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1944163

Thomas, P., & Bain, J. (1984). Contextual differences of learning approaches: The effects of assessment. Human Learning, 3, 227–240.

Trail, L., Fields, S., & Caukin, N. (2020). Finding flexibility with HyFlex: Teaching in the digital age. International Journal of the Whole Child, 5(2), 22–26.

Trigwell, K., & Prosser, M. (1991). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22(3), 251–266.

Trigwell, K., Prosser, M., Ramsden, P., & Martin, E. (1988). Improving student learning through a focus on the teaching context. In C. Rust (Ed.), Improving students as learners (pp. 97–103). Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, Oxford Brookes University.

Tsai, Y. S., Perrotta, C., & Gašević, D. (2020). Empowering learners with personalised learning approaches? Agency, equity and transparency in the context of learning analytics. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(4), 554–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2019.1676396

Tucker, C. R., Wycoff, T., & Green, J. T. (2017). Blended learning in action: A practical guide toward sustainable change. Corwin.

Uden, L., Liberona, D., & Ristvej, J. (2018). Learning technology for education challenges. In L. Uden, D. Liberona, & J. Ristvej (Eds.), Communications in Computer and Information Science. Springer.

Watkins, D. (1996). Learning theories and approaches to research: A cross-cultural perspective. In D. Watkins & J. Biggs (Eds.), Chinese learner: cultural, psychological, and contextual influences (pp. 3–24). Comparative Education Research Centre/Australian Council for Educational Research.

Wiraningsih, P., & Santosa, M. H. (2020). EFL teachers’ challenges in promoting learner autonomy in the 21st century learning. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 10(2), 290–314. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v10i2.1881

Wittrock, M. C. (1974). Learning as a generative process. Educational Psychologist, 11, 87–95.

Wright, G. B. (2011). Student-centered learning in higher education. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 23(3), 92–97.

Zarouk, M. Y., Restivo, F., & Khaldi, M. (2018). Student-centered learning environment for self-regulated project-based learning in higher education: A qualification/selection study. Learning through Inquiry in Higher Education: Current Research and Future Challenges (INHERE 2018), 2–15.

Zhao, A., Guo, Y., & Dynia, J. (2013). Foreign language reading anxiety: Chinese as a foreign language in the United States. Modern Language Journal, 97(3), 764–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2013.12032.x

Zucker, L., & Fisch, A. (2019). Play and learning with KAHOOT!: Enhancing collaboration and engagement in grades 9-16 through digital games. Journal of Language and Literacy Education, 15(1), 1–15.

Downloads

Published

2021-11-25

How to Cite

Santosa, M. H. ., Ratminingsih, N. M. ., & Adnyani, L. D. S. . . (2021). Students’ Learning Approaches in The EFL Emergency Online Learning Context. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 8(2), 185–218. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v8i2.3215