The The Influence of Peer Corrective Feedback (PCF) on Students' Writing Skills in Hortatory Exposition Text
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v11i2.3364Keywords:
Peer Corrective Feedback (PCF), Writing Skills, Student Learning, Colaborative Learning, Hortatory Exposition TextAbstract
This study aims to determine the influence of peer corrective feedback (PCF) treatment on students' writing skills in the hortatory exposition text of grade XI in the second semester of vocational high school. This research used a quasi-experiment with a non-equivalent pre-test and post-test control group design. The data were collected from forty-three students from the experimental and control groups through observation, tests including pre-test and post-test, and treatment through feedback responses and PCF form for the experimental class. The data were analyzed by using a paired sample t-test to compare the writing skills in each of the two classes, and an independent sample t-test to determine the influence of peer corrective feedback on students’ writing skills. The paired sample t-test indicated a significant difference in writing skills between both classes. The independent sample t-test showed that peer corrective feedback positively influenced students' writing, helping with the correction and revision process, as a result, it is improving their hortatory exposition writing skills. It also enhanced their learning experience and motivation in the classroom as it was supported by more interactive and communicative learning through a collaborative learning environment.
Downloads
References
Alemi, M., Salmani Givi, S., & Rezanejad, A. (2022). The role of digital storytelling in EFL students’ writing skill and motivation. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 32, 16–35. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2022.32.02
Bitchener, J., & Ferris, D. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing. Routledge.
Brown, H. D. (2006). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices (Nachdr.). Longman.
Cangelosi, J. S. (2014). Classroom management strategies: Gaining and maintaining students’ cooperation (Seventh edition). John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications Asia-Pacific Pte. Ltd.
Elfiyanto, S., & Fukazawa, S. (2020). Effect of teacher and peer written corrective feedback on writing components in EFL classrooms. JEES (Journal of English Educators Society), 5(2), 185–191. https://doi.org/10.21070/jees.v5i2.826
Fatoni, M. (2018). An analysis of peer corrective feedback on writing recount texts for Indonesian EFL university students. JEC : Journal Of Education and Counseling, 1, 27–33. https://journal.unugiri.ac.id/index.php/JEC/article/view/24/12
Ferris, D. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications for second language students. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Flora, Farhana, S., Nisa, K., & Mentari, R. (2020). The proportion of peer corrective feedback (PCF) on writing aspects: Are they really effective? Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Learning Innovation and Quality Education, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1145/3452144.3453835
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed). McGraw-Hill Humanities/Social Sciences/Languages.
Gaffar, M. A., & Irwayu, F. (2023). The implementation of project based learning to improve students’ skills in producing descriptive videos about historical buildings. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(6), 4223–4230. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i6.1821
Gaffar, M. A., & Sopiah, S. (2023). The implementation of the reading aloud strategy in enhancing oral transactions: Giving and asking for information. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 6(7), 4865–4870. https://doi.org/10.54371/jiip.v6i7.2364
Hellen, Y. N., & Hafizh, M. A. (2014). Teaching writing a hortatory exposition text by using the roundtable technique to senior high school students. 3(1). https://doi.org/10.24036/jelt.v3i1.4300
Huisman, B., Saab, N., Van Driel, J., & Van Den Broek, P. (2018). Peer feedback on academic writing: Undergraduate students’ peer feedback role, peer feedback perceptions and essay performance. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(6), 955–968. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1424318
Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. The United States of America by Cambridge University Press, New York.
Ilahi, R. K., Ningsih, K., & Anwar, D. (2018). The effect of peer corrective feedback on the tenth grade students’ writing ability of descriptive text at SMA Pertiwi 1 Padang. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR) 8(2). https://www.ijsr.net/archive/v8i2/ART20195368.pdf
Ingdriawati, A. H. (2023). Peer Feedback to Stimulate Students’ Writing Process: A Case Study At a Vocational School in Ciamis. Journal of English Education Program (JEEP), 10(1), 35. https://doi.org/10.25157/(jeep).v10i1.9699
Iriarte, M. G., & Alastuey, C. B. (2017). Peer vs. Teacher corrective feedback and its effect on grammar. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Peer-vs.-teacher-corrective-feedback-and-its-effect-Iriarte/c79f9646f2205861ecf49a76bb6470905334a21c
Jacobs, H. L., Wormuth, D. R., Zinkgraf, S. A., & Hearfiel, V. F. (1981). Testing ESL Composition: A Practical Approach. Massachuset: Newbury House.
Lasti’ah, L. (2021). Modified peer written corrective feedback on dialogue drafting of twelfth graders: Focusing on linguistic features. New Language Dimensions, 2(2), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.26740/nld.v2n2.p60-69
Lufita, N. I. (2019). Types of peer written corrective feedback on recount text in EFL class. RETAIN, 7(3), 134–143. https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/retain/article/view/30698
Mapile, R. F. G., & Lapinid, M. R. C. (2023). Online collaborative learning: Applicability in comparison with individual learning and face-to-face collaborative learning. MATHEMATICS TEACHING RESEARCH JOURNAL, 15(2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371811345_Online_collaborative_learning_Applicability_in_comparison_with_individual_learning_and_face-to-face_collaborative_learning
Nabiryo, Nancy R, & Sekiziyivu, S. (2020). The influence of peer interaction on students’ mastery of writing. Education Quarterly Reviews, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1993.03.01.120
Nunan, D. (2001). Second language acquisition. In The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages, eds. R. Carter and D. Nunan (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667206
Permendikbud. (2022). Salinan_Permendikbudristek No_21 Tahun 2022_ Standar Penilaian Pendidikan.pdf. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/224425/permendikbudriset-no-21-tahun-2022
Phe, C. Q. (2023). Exploring the effects of collaborative peer written corrective feedback on EFL students’ business english writing performance. Journal of Knowledge Learning and Science Technology ISSN: 2959-6386 (Online), 2(3), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.60087/jklst.vol2.n3.p211
Rouhi, A., Dibah, M., & Mohebbi, H. (2020). Assessing the effect of giving and receiving written corrective feedback on improving L2 writing accuracy: Does giving and receiving feedback have fair mutual benefit? Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 5(1), 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-020-00093-z
Ruru, T. A. N., & Sulistyo, T. (2020). Peer review in writing activities: Outcomes and perceptions of EFL students. Journal of Research on English and Language Learning (J-REaLL), 1(2), 127. https://doi.org/10.33474/j-reall.v1i2.6845
Sailah, N., & Halim, A. (2022). Students’ cognitive attitude toward the use of direct written corrective feedback in L2 writing. AL LUGHAWIYAAT, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.31332/alg.v2i1.2963
Shanorra, T. T., Sofyan, R., & Sumbayak, D. M. (2021). A writing skill assessment of the first semester english department students of the universitas sumatera utara. 32. https://repository.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/5256
Simonsmeier, B. A., Peiffer, H., Flaig, M., & Schneider, M. (2020). Peer feedback improves students’ academic self-concept in higher education. Research in Higher Education, 61(6), 706–724. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-020-09591-y
Siregar, S. P. E., Sari, F., Sudjoko, S., & Yundayani, A. (2022). Dealing with english writing skills: Through the eyes of vocational students. Eureka: Journal of Educational Research, 1(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.56773/ejer.v1i1.3
Sujito, S., Yunita, E., Wilujeng, T. T. R., Widjajanti, R., & Muttaqin, W. (2018). Applying direct peer feedback to foster vocational school students’ english writing performance: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities, 335–339. https://doi.org/10.5220/0007420103350339
Tanjung, M. R., & Kurniawan, E. (2024). Unveiling growth: Do master’s degrees propel professional development for english teachers at all experience levels? Voices of English Language Education Society, 8(1), 01–13. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v8i1.21440
Utami, S. I., & Arianti, T. (2023). Teacher’s use of written corrective feedback for students’ writing errors. Foremost Journal, 4(2), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.33592/foremost.v4i2.3668
Van Leeuwen, A., & Janssen, J. (2019). A systematic review of teacher guidance during collaborative learning in primary and secondary education. Educational Research Review, 27, 71–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.001
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society. The Development of Higher Psychological Process. Cambridge: Harvard University Press
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2021). The effects of providing and receiving peer feedback on writing performance and learning of secondary school students. American Educational Research Journal, 58(3), 492–526. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831220945266
Yolanda, I., Ngadiso, N., & Sumardi, S. (2018). Writing material for office administration study program in vocational high school: Students’ need analysis. Journal of English Education, 3(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.31327/jee.v3i2.860
Zeqiri, L. (2011). The role of peer feedback in developing better writing skills. South East European University Review, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/v10306-012-0003-8
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
