Tripartite Analysis of Empowering Indicators to Student Engagement: Informing A Conceptual Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v10i2.698Keywords:
learning improvement, student engagement, tripartite analysisAbstract
Student engagement has been labelled as the latest buzzword in the field of higher education. As it gains wide recognition as critical to learning improvement and student development, the ways contributing to engagement appear to be necessary to fully understand the definitions and potential factors. Therefore, this article employed a method of tripartite analysis to ideas on portrait engagement and comprehensively synthesized impacting variables which can empower learning engagement. Findings demonstrated an operational definition of student engagement as well as a conceptual framework illustrated in three broad factors including socio-cultural integration, structural variables and psychological dimension. The operational definition and conceptual framework provided deep insights into student engagement and implies educators systematically devise courses and teaching practices.
References
Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 391-405.
Blatchford, P., Bassett, P., & Brown, P. (2011). Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher–pupil interaction: Differences about pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools. Learning and instruction, 21(6), 715-730.
Bond, M., & Bedenlier, S. (2019). Facilitating student engagement through educational technology: towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, (1).
Bye, D., Pushkar, D., & Conway, M. (2007). Motivation, interest, and positive affect in traditional and nontraditional undergraduate students. Adult education quarterly, 57(2), 141-158.
Caner, M. (2010). A blended learning model for teaching practice course. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(3), 78-97.
Castro, S., Granlund, M., & Almqvist, L. (2017). The relationship between classroom quality-related variables and engagement levels in Swedish preschool classrooms: a longitudinal study. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 25(1), 122-135.
Chappuis, J. (2014). Thoughtful assessment with the learner in mind. Educational Leadership, 71(6), 20-26.
Coates, H. (2007). A model of online and general campus‐based student engagement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(2), 121-141.
David C. Griffey & Lynn Dale Housner (1991) Differences between Experienced and Inexperienced Teachers' Planning Decisions, Interactions, Student Engagement, and Instructional Climate, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62:2, 196-204, DOI: 10.1080/02701367.1991.10608710
Dewey, J. (1913). Interest and effort in education. Forgotten Books.
Diemer, M. A., Mistry, R. S., Wadsworth, M. E., López, I., & Reimers, F. (2013). Best practices in conceptualizing and measuring social class in psychological research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 13, 77–113.
Ellen A. Skinner, Nicolette P. Rickert, Justin W. Vollet & Thomas A. Kindermann (2022). The complex social ecology of academic development: A bioecological framework and illustration examining the collective effects of parents, teachers, and peers on student engagement. Educational Psychologist, DOI: 10.1080/00461520.2022.2038603
Ewell, P. T. (2010). The US national survey of student engagement (NSSE). In Public policy for academic quality (pp. 83-97). Springer, Dordrecht.
Farrell, O., & Brunton, J. (2020). A balancing act: a window into online student engagement experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-19.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept: State of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59–119.
Fredricks, J. A., Reschly, A. L., & Christenson, S. L. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of student engagement interventions: Working with disengaged students. Academic Press.
Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational psychologist, 41(2), 111-127.
Jensen, E. (2013). How poverty affects classroom engagement. Educational leadership, 70(8), 24-30.
Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in higher education, 38(5), 758-773.
Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher education research & development, 37(1), 58-71.
Kahu, E. R., Picton, C., & Nelson, K. (2020). Pathways to engagement: A longitudinal study of the first-year student experience in the educational interface. Higher Education, 79(4), 657-673.
Kearsley, G. & Shneiderman, B. (1998). Engagement theory: A framework for technology-based teaching and learning. Educational technology, 38(5), 20-23.
Keller, M. M., Hoy, A. W., Goetz, T., & Frenzel, A. C. (2016). Teacher enthusiasm: Reviewing and redefining a complex construct. Educational Psychology Review, 28(4), 743-769.
Kunter, M., Frenzel, A., Nagy, G., Baumert, J., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Teacher enthusiasm: Dimensionality and context specificity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 289-301.
Kuo, M., Browning, M. H., & Penner, M. L. (2018). Do lessons in nature boost subsequent classroom engagement? Refueling students in flight. Frontiers in psychology, 8, 2253.
Lazarides, R., Gaspard, H., & Dicke, A. L. (2019). Dynamics of classroom motivation: Teacher enthusiasm and the development of math interest and teacher support. Learning and Instruction, 60, 126-137.
Mauldin, R.L.; Barros-Lane, L.; Tarbet, Z.; Fujimoto, K.; Narendorf, S.C. Cohort-Based Education and Other Factors Related to Student Peer Relationships: A Mixed Methods Social Network Analysis. Educ. Sci. 2022, 12, 205.https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12030205
Natriello, G. (1984). Problems in the evaluation of students and student disengagement from secondary schools. Journal of research and development in education, 17(4), 14-24.
Newmann, F. M. (1985). The radical perspective on social studies: A synthesis and critique. Theory & Research in Social Education, 13(1), 1-18.
Nystrand, M., & Gamoran, A. (1991). Instructional discourse, student engagement, and literature achievement. Research in the Teaching of English, 261-290.
Oga-Baldwin, W. Q., & Nakata, Y. (2017). Engagement, gender, and motivation: A predictive model for Japanese young language learners. System, 65, 151-163.
Pekrun, R., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2012). Academic emotions and student engagement. In Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 259-282). Springer, Boston, MA.
Rachel E. Maunder (2017). Students’ peer relationships and their contribution to university adjustment: the need to belong in the university community. Journal of Further and Higher Education. DOI: 10.1080/0309877X.2017.1311996
Reschly, D. J., & Bergstrom, M. K. (2009). Response to intervention. In T. B. Gutkin, & C. R.
Reschly, A., Pohl, A., Christenson, C., & Appleton, J. (2017). Engaging adolescents in secondary school. In B. Schultz, J. Harrison, & S. Evans (Eds.), School mental health services for adolescents. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology (4th ed, pp. 434-460). New York: Wiley.
Rezvan, H., Besharat, M. A., Khaleghinezhad, S. A., & Jahromi, R. G. (2016). Peers' Perceived Support, Student Engagement in Academic Activities and Life Satisfaction: A Structural Equations Modeling Approach. School Psychology International, 1-15.
Sansone, C., & Smith, J. L. (2000). Interest and self-regulation: The relation between having to and wanting to. In Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation (pp. 341-372). Academic Press.
Shernoff, D. J., Sannella, A. J., Schorr, R. Y., Sanchez-Wall, L., Ruzek, E. A., Sinha, S., & Bressler, D. M. (2017). Separate worlds: The influence of seating location on student engagement, classroom experience, and performance in the large university lecture hall. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 49, 55-64.
Siddiqi, A. F., Shabbir, M. S., Abbas, M., Mahmood, A., & Salman, R. (2021). Developing and testing student engagement scale for higher educational students. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education.
Skinner, E. A., Wellborn, J. G., & Connell, J. P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I've got it: A process model of perceived control and children's engagement and achievement in school. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 22.
Taylor, E. W. (2019). Student–Teacher Relationships: The Elephant in the Classroom. In Connecting Adult Learning and Knowledge Management (pp. 69-83). Springer, Cham.
Vollet, J. W., Kindermann, T. A., & Skinner, E. A. (2017, January 2). In Peer Matters, Teachers Matter: Peer Group Influences on Students’ Engagement Depend on Teacher Involvement. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/edu0000172
Vitiello, V. E., Booren, L. M., Downer, J. T., & Williford, A. P. (2012). Variation in children's classroom engagement throughout a day in preschool: Relations to classroom and child factors. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(2), 210-220.
Vygotsky, L. S., & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard university press.
Zhoc, K. C., Webster, B. J., King, R. B., Li, J. C., & Chung, T. S. (2019). Higher education student engagement scale (HESES): Development and psychometric evidence. Research in Higher Education, 60(2), 219-244.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
