EFL Students’ Learning Engagement in The Post Pandemic Era
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v10i1.869Keywords:
Engagement, Offline Class, Post-Pandemic, Student’s Perception, TechnologyAbstract
The Indonesian government implemented online learning during the pandemic due to the spread of Covid-19. Nowadays, the post-pandemic era, the application of offline learning has begun to be carried out again and is equipped with technology previously applied during online class. These sudden changes in the education sector certainly affect EFL students' learning engagement. This study was conducted to investigate students' perceptions of English learning engagement in offline classes and to determine whether there is significant difference in learning engagement between online and offline classroom environments. The researcher used a quantitative approach with an Indonesian-language survey questionnaire distributed online to 11th-grade students with 751 participants. The results showed that offline classrooms equipped with technology had a positive result and got significant differences in learning engagement in almost every dimension. These findings also implied that students' engagement on emotional engagement shows no significant differences because the dimension is more affected by the teacher's support and self-awareness in using the language itself. Further implications of this research reveal the need to explore more about EFL teaching techniques and technologies in the learning process to maximize students' engagement.
Downloads
References
Astin, A. W. (1999). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Development, 40(5), 518–529.
Berrett, D. (2012). How ‘flipping’ the classroom can improve the traditional lecture. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 78(1), 36–41.
Bozkurt, A., & Sharma, R. C. (2020). Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), i–vi. https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.3778083
Buckingham, D. (2003). Media education: Literacy, learning, and contemporary culture. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press; Malden, MA: Distributed in the USA by Blackwell Pub.
Conole, G., Laat, M., Dillon, T., & Darby, J. (2008). ‘Disruptive technologies’, ‘pedagogical innovation’: What’s new? Findings from an in-depth study of students’ use and perception of technology. Computers & Education, 50(2), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2007.09.009
Daniel, S. J. (2020). Education and the COVID-19 pandemic. Prospects, 49(1–2), 91–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-020-09464-3
Deschaine, M. E., & Whale, D. E. (2017). Increasing student engagement in online educational leadership courses. Journal of Educators Online, 14(1). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1133612
Dhawan, S. (2020). Online learning: A Panacea in the time of COVID-19 crisis. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 49(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239520934018
Dixson, M. D. (2015). Measuring student engagement in the online course: The online student engagement scale (OSE). Online Learning, 19(4). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i4.561
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074001059
Fredricks, J. A., & McColskey, W. (2012). The measurement of student engagement: A comparative analysis of various methods and student self-report instruments. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 763–782). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_37
Ginting, D. (2021). Student engagement and factors affecting active learning in English language teaching. Voices of English Language Education Society, 5(2), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v5i2.3968
Hadi, S. (1991). Analisis butir untuk instrumen angket, tes dan skala nilai dengan basica. Yogyakarta : Andi Offset.
Hill, C., Rosehart, P., St. Helene, J., & Sadhra, S. (2020). What kind of educator does the world need today? Reimagining teacher education in post-pandemic Canada. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 565–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1797439
Huong, T. L. K. (2022). EFL Vietnamese student engagement in face-to-face learning environment. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(12), 382–397. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i12.4604
Jandrić, P. (2020). Postdigital research in the time of Covid-19. Postdigital Science and Education, 2(2), 233–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-020-00113-8
Kemp, N., & Grieve, R. (2014). Face-to-face or face-to-screen? Undergraduates’ opinions and test performance in classroom vs. online learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01278
Lai, H.-M. (2021). Understanding what determines university students’ behavioral engagement in a group-based flipped learning context. Computers & Education, 173, 104290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104290
Lei, H., Cui, Y., & Zhou, W. (2018). Relationships between student engagement and academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(3), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.7054
Liu, M., Zhou, R., Dai, J., & Feng, X. (2022). Analysis and practice of using modern information technology for classroom teaching mode reform. Mobile Information Systems, 2022, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2565735
Matell, M. S., & Jacoby, J. (1972). Is there an optimal number of alternatives for Likert-scale items? Effects of testing time and scale properties. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(6), 506–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0033601
Maulana, L., Apriliaswati, R., & Sumarni, S. (2022). Analyzing EFL students’ learning engagement in the online learning process. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa (JPPK), 11(12), 1584–1591. https://doi.org/10.26418/jppk.v11i12.60112
Nemoto, T., & Beglar, D. (2014). Developing Likert-scale questionnaires. JALT 2013 Conference Proceedings, 1-8.
Ngo, H. (2021). Perceptions of EFL tertiary students towards the correlation between e-learning and learning engagement during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J.TESOL Educ.1, 235–259. https://doi.org/10.11250/ijte.01.03.013
Ramey, C. T., & Ramey, S. L. (2004). Early learning and school readiness: Can early intervention make a difference? Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(4), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1353/mpq.2004.0034
Reeve, J. (2012). A self-determination theory perspective on student engagement. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 149–172). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_7
Römer, K. (2020). COVID-19: A wake-up call to invest in literacy | ONLY CONNECT. Education 2020. https://thelifelonglearningblog.uil.unesco.org/2020/07/21/covid-19-a-wake-up-call-to-invest-in-literacy/
Schindler, L. A., Burkholder, G. J., Morad, O. A., & Marsh, C. (2017). Computer-based technology and student engagement: A critical review of the literature. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-017-0063-0
Schunk, D. H., & Mullen, C. A. (2012). Self-efficacy as an engaged learner. In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of Research on Student Engagement (pp. 219–235). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_10
Simbolon, N. (2021). EFL students’ perceptions of blended learning in English language course: Learning experience and engagement. Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 11, 152–174. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v11i1.2518
Suharti, D. S., Suherdi, D., & Setyarini, S. (2021). Exploring students’ learning engagement in EFL online classroom. Thirteenth Conference on Applied Linguistics (CONAPLIN 2020), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210427.022
Susanti, Y. (2020). The students’ engagement in EFL online class. Lingual: Journal of Language and Culture, 10(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.24843/LJLC.2020.v10.i02.p02
Svalberg, A. M.-L. (2009). Engagement with language: Interrogating a construct. Language Awareness, 18(3–4), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658410903197264
Tarkar, P. (2020). Impact of Covid-19 pandemic on education system. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(9).
The Ministry of Education, Culture, Research, and Technology, web manager. (2022). SKB 4 Menteri Terbaru Atur Pembelajaran Tatap Muka Seratus Persen. Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset, Dan Teknologi. https://www.kemdikbud.go.id/main/blog/2022/05/skb-4-menteri-terbaru-atur-pembelajaran-tatap-muka-seratus-persen
Umbach, P. D., & Wawrzynski, M. R. (2005). Faculty do matter: The role of college faculty in student learning and engagement. Research in Higher Education, 46(2), 153–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-004-1598-1
Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Adolescent behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement trajectories in school and their differential relations to educational success. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 22(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-7795.2011.00753.x
Wong, A., & Chong, S. (2018). Modelling adult learners’ online engagement behaviour: Proxy measures and its application. Journal of Computers in Education, 5(4), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-018-0123-z
World Health Organitation. (2020). WHO Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) dashboard. Bangladesh Physiotherapy Journal, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.46945/bpj.10.1.03.01
Yang, Y.-F. (2011). Engaging students in an online situated language learning environment. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2010.538700
Zhang, W., & Perris, K. (2004). Researching the efficacy of online learning: A collaborative effort amongst scholars in Asian open universities. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 19(3), 247–264. https://doi.org/10.1080/0268051042000280110
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
