Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Cooperative Integrated Reading and Composition (CIRC), Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD), Dan Jigsaw secara Online terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas X Di SMK PGRI 1 Ngawi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30762/factor_m.v4i1.3407Keywords:
CIRC, Learning Outcomes, Jigsaw, STADAbstract
Research objectives 1) To find out whether there are significant differences in student learning outcomes who are subject to CIRC, STAD, and Jigsaw in class X at SMK PGRI 1 Ngawi; 2) to find out which one gives better student learning outcomes, students are subjected to CIRC, STAD, or Jigsaw. This study uses a quantitative approach with quasi-experimental research methods. The population is all students of class X at SMK PGRI 1 Ngawi for the Academic Year 2020/2021. The sample is 100 students. The sampling technique used is Simple Random Sampling. Data collection techniques using documentation and tests. The instrument test used validity, difficulty level reliability, and discriminatory power. Prerequisite tests are normality test and homogeneity test. The analysis technique used one-way ANOVA and further test with Scheffe test. Research results 1) There are significant differences in student learning outcomes who are subject to CIRC, STAD, and online Jigsaw in class X at SMK PGRI 1 Ngawi; 2) The learning outcomes of students who are subject to CIRC are better than the learning outcomes of students who are subject to STAD. The learning outcomes of students who were subjected to STAD were as good as the learning outcomes of students who were subjected to Jigsaw. The learning outcomes of students who were subjected to CIRC were as good as the learning outcomes of students who were subjected to Jigsaw.
References
Pusat Penilaian Nasional. (2019). Diambil kembali dari Laporan Hasil Ujian Nasional Tahun Pelajaran 2018/2019: ilun.puspendik.kemendikbut.go.id
Arikunto, S. (2018). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Askara.
musrini. (2016). Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Eksplicit Instruction. Purwokerto: Bebook Publisher.
Ridwan, A. (2015). Upaya Meningkatkan Motivasi, Kreativitas, Dan Prestasi Belajar IPA Dengan Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw. Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 3.
Rusman. (2011). Model-Model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Sugiyono. (2019). Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suryabrata, S. (2015). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada.
Syaputri, C. N., & Djulia, E. (2018). pengaruh Model CIRC (Cooperative Reading And Composition) Dengan Menggunakan Peta Konsep Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Jaringan Tumbuhan di Kelas XI IPA Muhammadiyah 1 Medan. Pelita Pendidikan, 6, 54-59.
Trisianawati, E., Djudin, T., & Setiawan, R. (2016). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Jigsaw Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Materi Vektor Di Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Sanggau ledo. Penelitian Fisika Dan Aplikasinya (JPFA), 6, 51-60.
Untari, E. (2020). Efektivitas Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Think Pair Share (TPS) Dan Tipe Time Token Arends Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Berinteraksi Siswa. Focus ACTion Of Research Mathematic, 3, 1-17.
Wardana, I., Banggali, T., & Husain, H. (2017). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Student Team achievement Division (STAD) Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas XI IPA Avogadro SMA Negeri 2 Pangkajene (Studi Pada Materi Asam Basa). Chemica, 18, 76-84.
