The students' visual reasoning in solving integral problems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30762/f_m.v6i2.1988Keywords:
Visual reasoning, Problem Solving, IntegralAbstract
Kalkulus integral merupakan salah satu mata kuliah matematika yang memerlukan penalaran, kemampuan komunikasi serta kemampuan berpikir tingkat tinggi dalam menyelesaikannya. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk mendeskripsikan penalaran visual mahasiswa dalam menyelesaikan masalah integral. Subjek penelitian 3 mahasiswa S1 Prodi Studi Tadris Matematika UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung. Teknik pengumpulan data menggunakan tes dan wawancara. Analisis data dengan mereduksi data, menyajikan data dan menarik kesumpulan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya perbedaan penalaran mahasiswa laki-laki dan Perempuan dalam menyelesaikan masalah integral. Mahasiswa Laki-laki lebih mampu memenuhi proses penalaran yaitu representasi visual, visualisasi, dan transisi ke berpikir matematis.
Integral calculus is a mathematics course that requires reasoning, communication skills and high-level thinking skills to complete it. The objective of this research is to describe students' visual reasoning in solving integral problems. The research subjects were 3 undergraduate students from the Tadris Mathematics Program at UIN Sayyid Ali Rahmatullah Tulungagung. Data collection techniques used tests, think-aloud, and interviews. Data analysis used reducing data, presenting data, and concluding. The research results showed that there are differences in the reasoning of male and female students in solving integral problems. Male students are better able to fulfill the reasoning process, such as visual representation, visualization, and transition to mathematical thinking.
References
Agustin, Ririn Dwi. 2016. “Kemampuan Penalaran Matematika Mahasiswa Melalui Pendekatan Problem Solving.” PEDAGOGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan 5(2):179. doi: 10.21070/pedagogia.v5i2.249.
Aziz, Saddam Al, Ali Azmar, Defri Ahmad, Fridgo Tasman, and Ronal Rifandi. 2020. “Kemampuan Penalaran Mahasiswa Saat Memecahkan Masalah Pada Mata Kuliah Telaah Kurikulum Matematika Sekolah Menengah.” JURNAL EKSAKTA PENDIDIKAN (JEP) 4(2). doi: 10.24036/jep/vol4-iss2/519.
Bailey, R. N. 1996. Human Performance Engineering: Designing High Quality Professional User Interhaves for Computer Products, Applications and System. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Cahyani, L. N., Shodiq, L. J., & Agustin, D. R. 2022. “Kemampuan Literasi Matematika Siswa Dalam Memecahkan Soal TIMMS Konten Aljabar Ditinjau Dari Pengetahuan Metakognitif.” Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M) 5(1), 31–5. doi: https://doi.org/10.30762/f_m.v5i1.64.
Creswell, John W. 1998. Qualitative Inquiry And Research Design: Choosing Among Five Traditions. London: SAGE Publications.
Hamid, H. A., & Idris, N. 2014. “Assessing Pre-University Students’ Visual Reasoning: A Graphical Approach.” International Journal of Assessment and Evaluation in Education 4, 24–39.
Hershkowitz, R., Tabach, M., & Dreyfus, T. n.d. “Creative Reasoning and Shifts of Knowledge in the Mathematics Classroom. ZDM Mathematics Education, 49(1), 25–36. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S11858-016-0816-6.” 2016.
Kholil, M. 2018. “Implementasi Pembelajaran Inquiry Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Pada Pokok Bahasan Logika Matematika.” LAPLACE : Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika 1(1), 15–2.
Krutetskii, V.. 1976. The Psychology of Mathematics Abilities in School Children. Chicago: The University of Chicago press.
Leighton, J. P. 2004. “Defining and Describing Reasoning. In J. P. Leighton & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Nature of Reasoning (Pp. 3–11). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Https://Doi.Org/10.1017/CBO9780511818714.001.”
Mehmet Ertürk GEÇİCİ, Elif TÜRNÜKLÜ. 2021. “Visual Reasoning in Mathematics Education: A Conceptual Framework Proposal.” Acta Didactica Napocensia 14(1):115–26. doi: 10.24193/adn.14.1.9.
Moursund, D. 2005. “Improving Math Education in Elementary Schools: A Short Book for Teachers. Eugene, Oregon: University of Oregon. Retrieved from Https://Pages.Uoregon.Edu/Moursund/Books/ElMath/ElMath.Pdf.”
Natsheh, I., & Karsenty, R. 2013. “Exploring the Potential Role of Visual Reasoning Tasks Among Inexperienced Solvers. ZDM Mathematics Education, 46(1), 109–122. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S11858-013-0551-1.”
Pandu, Y. K., & Suwarsono, S. 2021. “Analisis Kemampuan Penalaran Matematika Mahasiswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Matematika Materi Limit Fungsi. PRISMA: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Matematika, 436–445. Retrieved from Https://Journal.Unnes.Ac.Id/Sju/Index.Php/Prisma/Article/View/44991.”
Putri, D. K., Sulianto, J., & Azizah, M. 2019. “Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Ditinjau Dari Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah.” International Journal of Elementary Education, 3(3), 351-357.
Ratwani, R. M., Trafton, J. G., & Boehm-Davis, D. A. 2008. “Thinking Graphically: Connecting Vision and Cognition During Graph Comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14(1), 36–49.”
Seel, N. M. 2012. “Problems: Definition, Types, and Evidence. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Boston, MA: Springer. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_914.”
Sholihah, N., & Aini, A. N. (2023). Students’ mathematical reasoning ability with visual, auditorial and kinesthetic learning styles in solving HOTS problems. Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M), 6(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.30762/factor_m.v6i1.1108
Suherman, E. 2001. Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika FMIPA UPI.
Susanto, A. 2019. “Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematis, Model Reciprocal Teaching Dan Model Air Auditory Intellectualy Repetition.” Math Educa Journal 3(2), 222.
Utami, Indah Wahyu, and Abdul Haris Rosyidi M.Pd. 2016. “Profil Lapisan Pemahaman Property Noticing Siswa Pada Materi Logaritma Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin.” Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika 1(5):21–29.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ummu Sholihah, Beni Asyhar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
