The concept structure of student in mathematical literacy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30762/f_m.v7i2.3757Keywords:
Concept Structure, Mathematical Literacy, Student ConceptAbstract
Mathematical literacy is crucial for students to apply mathematical concepts in real-world contexts. This study investigated the structure of students' concepts in mathematical literacy, focusing on a case study of a single eighth-grade student (S11) at SMP Negeri 9 Kota Tasikmalaya, Indonesia. Using a qualitative exploratory approach, the research employed a modified PISA mathematical literacy test, followed by a semi-structured interview and analysis of the student's work. Data analysis followed the interactive model proposed by Miles and Huberman which involved three concurrent flows of activity namely data reduction, presentation and conclusion drawing. The results revealed that S11 only met the assumption indicator of mathematical literacy, leading to an incomplete and inaccurate conceptual structure. The study identified multiple instances of concept structure fragmentation, specifically hole construction fragmentation and pseudo-construction fragmentation. These fragmentations were attributed to limited reading comprehension skills, incomplete recording of question information, failures in mathematical concept construction (particularly in division), difficulties in assimilating and accommodating new information, and lack of social interaction with more competent individuals. These results provide valuable insights into students' challenges in applying mathematical concepts to practical scenarios.
Downloads
References
Ardiansah,R., & Zulfiani, Z. (2023). Development of interactive e-LKPD based on creative thinking skills on the concept of environmental change. JPBI (Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia), 9(2), 179-197. https://doi.org/10.22219/jpbi.v9i2.22389.
Bahrudin, M. A., Indrawatiningsih, N., & Nazihah, Z. (2019). Defragmenting struktur berpikir siswa smp dalam menyelesaikan masalah bangun datar. IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education, 2(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.30738/indomath.v2i2.4701.
Cahyani, L. N., Shodiq, L. J., & Agustin, D. R. (2022). Kemampuan literasi matematika siswa dalam memecahkan soal TIMMS konten aljabar ditinjau dari pengetahuan metakognitif. Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M), 5(1), 31-51. https://doi.org/10.30762/f_m.v5i1.646.
Fenanlampir, A., Batlolona, J. R., & Imelda, I. (2019). The struggle of indonesian students in the context of TIMMS and PISA has not ended. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 10(2), 393-406. https://iaeme.com/MasterAdmin/Journal_uploads/IJCIET/VOLUME_10_ISSUE_2/IJCIET_10_02_042.pdf.
Fernanda, A., & Kholid, M. N. (2023). Defragmenting the structure of mathematical thinking students in solving problems in the analytical geometry material field. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2886(1), 020040. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0154619.
Jannah, F.L., Aminah, N., Pramuditya, S.A., Rosita, C. D., & Noto, M. S. (2024). Analysis of learning obstacles for junior high school students in understanding SPLDV concepts. Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M), 6(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.30762/f_m.v6i2.1862.
Hadi, H. S., Susanti, E., & Turmudi, T. (2022). Struktur berpikir siswa terhadap kesalahan membaca berdasarkan teori Newman dalam menyelesaikan masalah matematika melalui defragmentasi. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 6(3), 3326-3341. https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v6i3.1813.
Kaup, B., Ulrich, R., Bausenhart, K. M., Bryce, D., Butz, M. V., Dignath, D., Dudschig, C., Franz, V. H., Friedrich, C., Gawrilow, C., Heller, J., Huff, M., Hütter, M., Janczyk, M., Leuthold, H., Mallot, H., Nürk, H. C., Ramscar, M., Said, N., … Wong, H. Y. (2024). Modal and amodal cognition: an overarching principle in various domains of psychology. Psychological Research, 88(2), 307-337. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-023-01878-w.
Laili, F. Z., & Kholid, M. N. (2024). Defragmenting students’ thinking structures in constructing mathematical concepts in statistics materials. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2926(1), 020030. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0182793.
Nugroho, W., Kholid, M. N., Noprisa, Utami, R. T., & Salamah. (2024). Defragmenting mathematical literacy in solving system of two-variable linear equations (STLE). AIP Conference Proceedings, 2926(1), 020016. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0182802.
OECD. (2021). PISA 2022 Mathematics framework. https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/pisa-2022-assessment-and-analytical-framework_dfe0bf9c-en/full-report/component-3.html#chapter-d1e578-fa5f5afea0.
Peer, M., Brunec, I. K., Newcombe, N. S., & Epstein, R. A. (2021). Structuring knowledge with cognitive maps and cognitive graphs. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 25(1), 37-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.10.004.
Prabawati, M., Herman, T., & Turmudi. (2019). Mathematical literacy skills students of the junior high school in term of gender differences. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1315(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1315/1/012084.
Pusat Asesmen Pendidikan. (2022). Buku panduan capaian hasil asesmen nasional untuk satuan pendidikan. Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan Kemendikbudristek.
Rahmawati, R., & Ikashaum, F. (2021). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal pemecahan masalah matematika berdasarkan teori Newman. Hipotenusa Journal of Research Mathematics Education (HJRME), 4(2), 102-112. https://doi.org/10.36269/hjrme.v4i2.499.
Rofi’ah, N., Ansori, H., & Mawaddah, S. (2019). Analisis kesalahan siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita matematika berdasarkan langkah penyelesaian Polya. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 120-129. https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v7i2.7379.
Saha, M., Islam, S., Akhi, A. A., & Saha, G. (2024). Factors affecting success and failure in higher education mathematics: Students’ and teachers’ perspectives. Heliyon, 10(7), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29173.
Savitri, S. N., & Kholid, M. N. (2024). Defragmenting mathematical literacy in solving non-routine problems. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2926(1), 020018. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0182804.
Schunk, D. H. (2020). Learning theories: An educational perspective (8th ed.). Pearson, Inc.
Subanji. (2016). Teori defragmentasi struktur berpikir dalam mengonstruksi konsep dan pemecahan masalah matematika (1st ed.). Universitas Negeri Malang (UM Press).
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Usodo, B., Aulia, I. I., Wulandari, A. N., Sutopo, Setiawan, R., Kurniawati, I., & Kuswardi, Y. (2020). Fragmentation of thinking structure and its impact to students’ algebraic concept construction and problem solving. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1567(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1567/3/032006.
Whittington, J. C. R., McCaffary, D., Bakermans, J. J. W., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2022). How to build a cognitive map. Nature Neuroscience, 25(10), 1257–1272. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:252542394.
Wibawa, K. A., Payadnya, I. P. A. A., Atmaja, I. M. D., & Simons, M. D. (2020). Defragmenting structures of students’ translational thinking in solving mathematical modeling problems based on CRA framework. Beta: Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 13(2), 130–151. https://doi.org/10.20414/betajtm.v13i2.327.
Wulandari, S., & Gusteti, M. U. (2021). Defragmentation of preservice teacher’s thinking structures in solving higher order mathematics problem. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1940(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1940/1/012099.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Hadi Sopandi, Supratman, Sinta Verawati Dewi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
