Mapping the morphology of complex words: A scientometric and pedagogical perspective

Authors

  • Danang Satria Nugraha Sanata Dharma University
  • Suhailee Sohnui Chiang Mai University, Thailand

Keywords:

complex words, morphology, scientometrics, pedagogical implication

Abstract

Complex word formation, a central process in morphology, has recently garnered increasing attention in linguistic research within the last decade. This study employs a scientometric approach to map the current landscape of this domain, aiming to reveal the field’s structure, trends, and thematic foci, with a focus on extracting pedagogical implications. Using VOSviewer software, we analyzed 488 documents retrieved from the Scopus database, spanning the years 2014 to 2024. The analysis revealed a dynamic field with an overall upward trend in publications, with a mean annual publication frequency of 48 documents across the 11-year period. A steady increase was observed from 2016 onwards, culminating in a peak in 2020. This peak signifies a growth of approximately 132% from the nadir of 2015. Leading researchers included Booij, G. and Plag, I., while Mental Lexicon and Morphology emerged as the most prominent publishers. Specifically, keyword analysis identified six distinct clusters: (1) fundamental concepts (25.5%); (2) language processing and acquisition (23.4%); (3) cognitive mechanisms (21.3%); (4) experimental perspectives (14.9%); (5) language development (9.6%); and (6) theoretical linguistics (5.3%). To some extent, these findings provide insights into the current state and future directions of complex word formation research, with implications for both linguistic theory and pedagogical practice.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aria, M., & Cuccurullo, C. (2017). bibliometrix: An R-tool for comprehensive science mapping analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 959–975. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.007

Audring, J. (2022). Advances in Morphological Theory: Construction Morphology and Relational Morphology. Annual Review of Linguistics, 8(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-linguistics-031120-115118

Audring, J., Booij, G., & Jackendoff, R. (2017). Menscheln, kibbelen, sparkle Verbal diminutives between grammar and lexicon. Linguistics in the Netherlands, 34(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1075/avt.34.01aud

Baayen, R. H., Schreuder, R., & Sproat, R. (2000). Morphology in the Mental Lexicon: A Computational Model for Visual Word Recognition. In F. Van Eynde & D. Gibbon (Eds.), Lexicon Development for Speech and Language Processing (pp. 267–293). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-9458-0_9

Baerman, M., Brown, D., & Corbett, G. G. (2017). Morphological complexity. In Morphological Complexity. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316343074

Beard, R., & Volpe, M. (2005). Lexeme-Morpheme Base Morphology. In P. Štekauer & R. Lieber (Eds.), Handbook of Word-Formation. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, vol 64 (pp. 189–205). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-3596-9_8

Blevins, J. P. (2006). Word-based morphology. Journal of Linguistics, 42(3), 531–573. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226706004191

Booij, G. (2014). Language use and the architecture of grammar: A construction morphology perspective | Jezična uporaba i ustroj gramatike: Perspektiva konstrukcijske morfologije. Suvremena Lingvistika, 40(78), 193–212.

Booij, G. (2015). Word-formation in construction grammar. In Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe (Vol. 1). https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110246254-014

Booij, G. (2017). Inheritance and motivation in construction morphology. In Defaults in Morphological Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198712329.003.0002

Booij, G. (2018). Phonology and the Dutch-Polish connection: A personal memoir. In Phonology, Fieldwork and Generalizations.

Booij, G. (2020). Principles of word formation. In The Cambridge Handbook of Germanic Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108378291.012

Booij, G., & Audring, J. (2018). Category change in construction morphology. In Constructional Approaches to Language (Vol. 20). https://doi.org/10.1075/cal.20.08boo

Boyé, G. (2018). Lexemes, categories and paradigms: What about cardinals? In The Lexeme in Descriptive and Theoretical Morphology. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1406989

Casalis, S., Commissaire, E., & Duncan, L. G. (2015). Sensitivity to morpheme units in English as L2 word recognition. Writing Systems Research, 7(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2014.976165

Ciaccio, L. A., Bürki, A., & Clahsen, H. (2023). Inter-individual variability in morphological processing: An ERP study on German plurals. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2023.101138

Clahsen, H., & Jessen, A. (2019). Do bilingual children lag behind? A study of morphological encoding using ERPs. Journal of Child Language, 46(5), 955–979. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000919000321

Clahsen, H., & Jessen, A. (2020a). Variability and its limits in bilingual word recognition: A morphological priming study. Mental Lexicon, 15(2), 295–329. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20013.cla

Clahsen, H., & Jessen, A. (2020b). Variability and its limits in bilingual word recognition: A morphological priming study. Mental Lexicon, 15(2), 295–329. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20013.cla

Crosson, A. C., & Moore, D. (2017). When to Take Up Roots: The Effects of Morphology Instruction for Middle School and High School English Learners. Reading Psychology, 38(3), 262–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2016.1263699

Deutsch, A., & Kuperman, V. (2019). Formal and semantic effects of morphological families on word recognition in Hebrew. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(1), 87–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2018.1513541

Deutsch, A., Velan, H., Merzbach, Y., & Michaly, T. (2021). The dependence of root extraction in a non-concatenated morphology on the word-specific orthographic context. Journal of Memory and Language, 116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2020.104182

Dressler, W. U. (2015). Allomorphy. Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, 1, 500–516. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110246254-029/HTML

Engemann, U. M., & Plag, I. (2021). Phonetic reduction and paradigm uniformity effects in spontaneous speech. Mental Lexicon, 16(1), 165–198. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.20023.eng

Eryiğit, G., Bektaş, F., Ali, U., & Dereli, B. (2023). Gamification of complex morphology learning: the case of Turkish. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 36(8), 1421–1449. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2021.1996396

Fejzo, A. (2016). The contribution of morphological awareness to the spelling of morphemes and morphologically complex words in French. Reading and Writing, 29(2), 207–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9586-8

Fradin, B. (2020). Characterizing derivational paradigms. Empirical Approaches to Linguistic Theory, 16, 49–84. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004433410_004

Gahl, S., & Plag, I. (2019). Spelling errors in english derivational suffixes reflect morphological boundary strength: A case study. Mental Lexicon, 14(1), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1075/ml.19002.gah

Ginestet, E., Shadbolt, J., Tucker, R., Bosse, M.-L., & Deacon, S. H. (2021). Orthographic learning and transfer of complex words: insights from eye tracking during reading and learning tasks. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12341

Goldin, M., López Otero, J. C., & Hur, E. (2023). How frequent are these verbs? Isogloss. Open Journal of Romance Linguistics, 9(2), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/isogloss.194

Güven, S. (2024). Dyslexia in Turkish: A Complex Morphological System With Highly Transparent Orthography. In Dyslexia in Many Languages: Insights, Interactions and Interventions. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003408277-17

Hood, W. W., & Wilson, C. S. (2001). The literature of bibliometrics, scientometrics, and informetrics. Scientometrics, 52(2), 291–314. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1017919924342

Hüning, M., & Booij, G. (2014). From compounding to derivation the emergence of derivational affixes through “constructionalization.” Folia Linguistica, 48(2), 579–604. https://doi.org/10.1515/flin.2014.019

Jiang, Y.-L. B., & Kuo, L.-J. (2019). The development of vocabulary and morphological awareness: A longitudinal study with college EFL students. Applied Psycholinguistics, 40(4), 877–903. https://doi.org/10.1017/S014271641900002X

Körtvélyessy, L., & Štekauer, P. (2020). Complex Words: Advances in Morphology. In Complex Words: Advances in Morphology. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108780643

Kotowski, S., & Plag, I. (2023). The Semantics of Derivational Morphology (S. Kotowski & I. Plag, Eds.). De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111074917

Kotzer, M., Kirby, J. R., & Heggie, L. (2021). Morphological Awareness Predicts Reading Comprehension in Adults. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 302–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2021.1888362

Kraut, R. (2015). The relationship between morphological awareness and morphological decomposition among English language learners. Reading and Writing, 28(6), 873–890. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-015-9553-4

Lahoud, H., Eviatar, Z., & Kreiner, H. (2024). Eye-movement patterns in skilled Arabic readers: effects of specific features of Arabic versus universal factors. Reading and Writing, 37(5), 1079–1108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-023-10424-4

Levesque, K. C., Breadmore, H. L., & Deacon, S. H. (2021). How morphology impacts reading and spelling: advancing the role of morphology in models of literacy development. Journal of Research in Reading, 44(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12313

Levesque, K. C., & Deacon, S. H. (2022). Clarifying links to literacy: How does morphological awareness support children’s word reading development? Applied Psycholinguistics, 43(4), 921–943. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716422000194

Levesque, K. C., Kieffer, M. J., & Deacon, S. H. (2019). Inferring Meaning From Meaningful Parts: The Contributions of Morphological Skills to the Development of Children’s Reading Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 54(1), 63–80. https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.219

Lieber, R. (2017). Derivational Morphology. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.013.248

Lieber, R., & Plag, I. (2022). The semantics of conversion nouns and -ing nominalizations: A quantitative and theoretical perspective. Journal of Linguistics, 58(2), 307–343. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022226721000311

Matveeva, N. N., Fatkhutdinova, V. G., & Khromov, S. S. (2018). Lingo-didactic potential derivation syntagmatics in Russian language. Journal of Social Sciences Research, 2018(Special Is), 166–169. https://doi.org/10.32861/jssr.spi5.166.169

McDonald, E. (2017). The challenge of a “lacking” language: The historical development of Chinese grammatics. Chinese Language and Discourse, 8(2), 244–265. https://doi.org/10.1075/cld.00005.mcd

Moats, L. (2019). Phonics and spelling: Learning the structure of language at the word level. In Reading Development and Difficulties: Bridging the Gap Between Research and Practice. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-26550-2_3

Mulder, E., van der Graaf, J., Verhagen, V., Mos, M., & Droop, M. (2022). Developing a morphological awareness intervention through inquiry-based learning. Journal of Research in Reading, 45(3), 468–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12405

Nation, P. (2023). Word Parts and Language Learning. JALT Journal, 45(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.37546/JALTJJ45.2-3

Nugraha, D. S. (2022). Identifying Light Verb Constructions in Indonesian: A Direct Translation Approach. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 4(3), 298–311. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v4i3.1042

Nugraha, D. S. (2023). Morphosemantic Features of Mengambil ‘Take’ in the Light Verb Constructions of Indonesian. International Journal of Linguistics and Translation Studies, 4(3), 120–138. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlts.v4i3.327

Nugraha, D. S. (2024a). A Corpus-Based Study of Memberi ‘Give’ Light Verb Constructions. International Journal of Society, Culture and Language, 12(2), 104–120. https://doi.org/10.22034/ijscl.2024.2023112.3389

Nugraha, D. S. (2024b). A Morphological Analysis of the Indonesian Suffixation: A Look at the Different Types of Affixes and Their Semantic Changes. GEMA Online Journal of Language Studies, 24(4), 109–132. https://doi.org/10.17576/gema-2024-2404-07

Nugraha, D. S. (2024c). Analyzing Prefix /me(N)-/ in the Indonesian Affixation: A Corpus-Based Morphology. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(6), 1697–1711. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1406.10

Nugraha, D. S. (2024d). Analyzing the Derivational Verb of Indonesian Based on the Derivational Morphology. South Asian Research Journal of Arts, Language and Literature, 6(01), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.36346/sarjall.2024.v06i01.001

Nugraha, D. S. (2024e). Quantitative Analysis within Language Studies: An Analytical Views Based on the Bibliometrics Method. Script Journal: Journal of Linguistics and English Teaching, 9(2), 16–34. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v9i2.1695

Nugraha, D. S. (2024f). Some Notes on Indonesian Word Formation: A Study Based on the Derivational Morphology Approach. South Asian Research Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 6(01), 20–31. https://doi.org/10.36346/sarjhss.2024.v06i01.004

Nugraha, D. S. (2025). A decade of research on word formation in foreign language education: A scientometric mapping (2014–2024). Journal on English as a Foreign Language, 15(2), 485–516. https://doi.org/10.23971/jefl.v15i2.9841

Olsen, S. (2015). Composition. Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, 1, 364–386. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110246254-022/HTML

Plag, I. (2014). Phonological and phonetic variability in complex words: An uncharted territory. Italian Journal of Linguistics, 26(2), 209–228.

Plag, I. (2016). English. In Word-Formation: An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe (Vol. 4).

Plag, I. (2019). Word-Formation in English, Second Edition. In Word-Formation in Englis,: Second Edition. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316771402

Plag, I. (2020). Productivity and the Mental Lexicon. In Language in Use: A Reader.

Rolle, N. (2023). Polysynthesis, stress uniformity, and the opposite-to-anchor stress system in Ese Ejja. In Word Prominence in Languages with Complex Morphologies. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198840589.003.0012

Schmidtke, D., Van Dyke, J. A., & Kuperman, V. (2021). CompLex: an eye-movement database of compound word reading in English. Behavior Research Methods, 53(1), 59–77. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-020-01397-1

Soares, D., Carvalho, P., & Dias, D. (2020). Designing Learning Outcomes in Design Higher Education Curricula. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 39(2), 392–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12286

Sooryamoorthy, R. (2020). Scientometrics for the Humanities and Social Sciences. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003110415

Stump, G. (2020). 9 - Complex Exponents. In Complex Words: Advances in Morphology. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108780643.010

ten Hacken, P. (2019). Morphology in Jackendoff’s Parallel Architecture. In SpringerBriefs in Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-18009-6_3

Uygun, S., & Clahsen, H. (2021). Morphological processing in heritage speakers: A masked priming study on the Turkish aorist. Bilingualism, 24(3), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728920000577

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3

van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2023). VOSviewer (1.6.20). Universiteit Leiden.

Vender, M., Hu, S., Mantione, F., Savazzi, S., Delfitto, D., & Melloni, C. (2021). Inflectional morphology: evidence for an advantage of bilingualism in dyslexia. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24(2), 155–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1450355

Vender, M., Mantione, F., Savazzi, S., Delfitto, D., & Melloni, C. (2017). Inflectional morphology and dyslexia: Italian children’s performance in a nonword pluralization task. Annals of Dyslexia, 67(3), 401–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-017-0152-8

Waltman, L., & van Eck, N. J. (2019). Field Normalization of Scientometric Indicators (pp. 281–300). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02511-3_11

Zhang, J., Zhang, H., Relyea, J. E., Wui, M. G. L., Yan, Y., Nam, R., Enriquez, A., & Kharabi-Yamato, L. (2023). Orthographic facilitation in upper elementary students: does attention to morphology of complex words enhance the effects? Annals of Dyslexia, 73(1), 148–163. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11881-022-00270-4

Downloads

Published

22-05-2026

How to Cite

Nugraha, D. S., & Sohnui, S. (2026). Mapping the morphology of complex words: A scientometric and pedagogical perspective. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 13(1), 389–429. Retrieved from https://jurnalfaktarbiyah.iainkediri.ac.id/index.php/jeels/article/view/4786