Ambivalent Stances of Translanguaging Pedagogy in Indonesia: A Nexus Case Study

Authors

  • Yohanes Kurniawan Winardi English Department, Universitas Widya Kartika, English Department Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Eka Fadilah English Department, Universitas Widya Kartika, English Department Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Yulius Kurniawan English Department, Universitas Widya Kartika, English Department Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v12i2.5121

Keywords:

translanguaging, fixity and fluidity, monolingual space, multilingualism

Abstract

The primary objective of this research article is twofold: First, it examines the perspectives of Indonesian higher school students regarding the use of translanguaging both within and outside the classroom. Second, it analyzes the potential implications of translanguaging practices on their future careers. Adapting a nexus case-study framework, the study purposively selected five participants among 38 students who were pursuing a degree in economics at a private institution in Surabaya, Indonesia. The data were collected through classroom observations, participant reflections, and focus group discussions, then analyzed thematically to trace connections among historical bodies, interactional orders, and discourses in place. The findings reveal that the participants hold loose and gain viewpoints toward translanguaging. While the participants recognize the learning value of small group debates, they prefer to use only English during classroom lectures, reflected by the interplay between their linguistic histories, real-time classroom interactions, and broader societal ideologies monolingual space emerges when individuals conform to the ideals espoused by their social groupings. The participants’ alignment with monolingual norms is shaped by institutional expectations and imagined futures where English accuracy and fluency signals professionalism. Although translanguaging supports learning, they fear its overuse may constrain career advancement.  The consequences of these findings are further discussed in the closing portion of this work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agha, A. (2003). The social life of cultural value. Language & Communication, 23, 231–273.

Al-Bataineh, A. & Gallagher, K. (2021). Attitudes towards translanguaging: How future teachers perceive the meshing of Arabic and English in children’s storybooks. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 24 (3), 386-400. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2018.1471039

Bakhtin, M.M. (1981), Discourse in the Novel. In M. Holquist (ed.), The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays (pp. 269–434). Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.

Braun, V., and V. Clarke. (2006). ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 (2), 77–101.

Blommaert, J. (2005). Discourse: A Critical Introduction. Cambridge University Press.

Blommaert, J. (2007). Sociolinguistics and discourse analysis: Orders of indexicality and polycentricity. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 2(2), 115–130.

Callaghan, J., Moore, E., & Simpson, J. (2017): Coordinated action, communication, and creativity in basketball in super-diversity. Language and Intercultural Communication, 18 (1), 28–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/14708477.2017.1401694

Charalambous, P., Charalambous, C., & Zembylas, M. (2016). Troubling translanguaging: Language ideologies, super-diversity, and interethnic conflict. Applied Linguistics Review, 7, 327–352.

Creese, A., & Blackledge, A. (2010). Translanguaging in the bilingual classroom: A pedagogy for learning and teaching? Modern Language Journal, 94, 103–115.

Darjowidjojo, S. (1998). Strategies for a Successful National Language Policy: The Indonesian Case. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 130: 35–47

David, S.S., Shepard-Carey, L., Swearingen, A.J., & Heo, S. (2022). Entry points and trajectories: Teachers learning and doing translanguaging pedagogy. TESOL Journal, 13 (2), e603. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesj.603.

Deroo, M.R., and Ponzio, C. (2019). Confronting ideologies: A discourse analysis of in-service teachers’ translanguaging stances through an ecological lens. Biling. Res. J. 42 (2), 214–231.

Errington, J.J. (2000). Indonesian('s) authority, in Paul Kroskrity (ed.), Regimes of Language: Ideologies, Politics, and Identity, pp. 205-227. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.

Fadilah, E., Widiati, U., & Anugerahwati, M. (2021). Negotiated feedback, situated recast, and task-supported language instruction on the development of grammatical features. The Journal of ASIA TEFL, 18(4), 1071-1087.

Fadilah, E., Widiati, U., Latief, M. (2019). Reading dynamic patterns of silence as a communication strategy and impediment in the EFL classroom interaction. International Journal of Instruction, 12(4), 183-200.

Fadilah, E. (2018b). Rethinking the maintenance of CLT in Indonesia: A response to: Ariatna’s (Vol. 7, No. 2, 2016) “The Need for Maintaining CLT in Indonesia”. TESOL Journal, 9 (1), 224-236.doi: 10.1002/tesj.341

Galante, A. (2020). Pedagogical translanguaging in a multilingual English program in Canada: Student and teacher perspectives on challenges. System, 92, 1–10.

García, O., & Lin, A. M. Y. (2016). Translanguaging in bilingual education. In O. García, A. M. Y. Lin, & S. May (Eds.), Bilingual and Multilingual Education (Encyclopedia of Language and Education) (pp. 117–130). Switzerland: Springer.

García, O., & Wei, L. (2014). Translanguaging: Language, Bilingualism, and Education. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

García, O. (2009). Education, multilingualism, and translanguaging in the 21st century. In: Ajit Mohanty, Minati Panda, Robert Phillipson, and Tove Skutnabb-Kangas (eds.), Multilingual Education for Social Justice: Globalizing the Local, ed. by New Delhi: Orient Blackswan, pp. 128–145.

Gramling, D. (2016). The invention of monolingualism. New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Beacon Press.

Jaspers, J. (2022). Linguistic dilemmas and chronic ambivalence in the classroom. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 43(4), 281-294. doi:10.1080/01434632.2020.1733586

Jaspers, J., & Madsen, L. M. (2019). Fixity and fluidity in sociolinguistic theory and practice In J. Jaspers & L. M. Madsen (Eds.), Critical Perspectives on Linguistic Fixity and Fluidity: Languagised Lives (1 ed., pp. 1–26). Routledge. Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism

Jaspers, J. (2018). The transformative limits of translanguaging. Language & Communication 58, 1–10.

Kubota, R. (2016). The multi/plural turn, postcolonial theory, and neoliberal multiculturalism: Complicities and implications for applied linguistics. Applied Linguistics, 37(4), 474–494.

Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1985). Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. Verso.

Lane, P. (2009). Identities in action: A nexus analysis of identity construction and language shift. Journal of Sociolinguistics, 8(4), 446–463. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357209344549.

Lewis, G., Jones, B., & Baker, C. (2012). Translanguaging: developing its conceptualization and contextualization. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18 (7), 655–670.

MacSwan, J. (2017). A multilingual perspective on translanguaging. American Educational Research Journal, 54 (1), 167–201. DOI: 10.3102/0002831216683935.

MacSwan, J. (2020). Translanguaging, language ontology, and civil rights. World Englishes, 39 (2), 321–333.

Makoni, S., & Pennycook, A. (2007). Disinventing and reconstituting languages. In S. Makoni & A. Pennycook (Eds), Disinventing and reconstituting languages (pp. 1–41), Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.

Maria Pesch, A. (2021), Semiotic landscapes as constructions of multilingualism: A case study of two kindergartens. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 29(3), 363–380

Nababan, P. W. J. (1991). Language in education: The case of Indonesia. International Review of Education, 37(1), 115–131.

Otheguy, R., García, O., & Reid, W. (2015). Clarifying, translanguaging, and deconstructing named languages. Applied Linguistics Review, 6, 281–307.

Ou, A. W., & Gu, M. M. (2023). Teacher professional identities and their impacts on translanguaging pedagogies in a STEM EMI classroom context in China: A nexus analysis. Language and Education, 38(1), 42–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2023.2244915.

Palfreyman, D.M., & Al-Bataineh, A. (2018). This is my lifestyle, Arabic and English: Students’ attitudes to (trans)languaging in a bilingual university context. Language Awareness, 27 (1-2), 79–95. doi:10.1080/09658416.2018.1431244

Pennycook, A. (2016). Mobile times, mobile terms: The trans-super-poly-metro movement. In N. Coupland (Ed.), Sociolinguistics: Theoretical Debates (pp. 201–206), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Poedjosoedarmo, S. (1968). Javanese speech levels, Indonesia 6, 54–81.

Otsuji, E., & Pennycook, A. (2010). Metrolingualism. Fixity, fluidity, and language are in flux. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7, 240–254.

Rasman (2018). To translate or not to translate? multilingual practice in an Indonesian EFL classroom. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7 (2), 687–694.

Ruuska, K. (2019). Languagised repertoires: How fictional languages have real effects. In J. Jaspers, & M. Madsen (Eds.), Critical Perspectives on Linguistic Fixity and Fluidity: Languagised Lives (pp. 53-75). Routledge. Routledge Critical Studies in Multilingualism. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429469312-3.

Saraceni, M., and Jacob, C. (2019). Revisiting borders: Named languages and decolonization. Language Sciences, 76, 101–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langsci.2018.05.007

Scollon, R., & Scollon, S.W. (2004). Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. New York: Routledge

Sneddon, J. (2003). The Indonesian language, its history, and its role in modern society. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.

Sugiharto, S. (2019). Communicative language teaching as situated practice: Moving beyond dogma. TESOL Journal, 10 (2), 1–7.

Swain, M. (2006). Languaging, agency and collaboration in advanced second language proficiency. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Advanced language learning: The contribution of Halliday and Vygotsky (pp. 95–108). London: Continuum.

Tamtomo, K. (2019). The creation of monolanguaging space in a krámá Javanese language performance. Language in Society, 48(1), 95–124. doi:10.1017/S0047404518001124

The Douglas Fir Group. (2016), A Transdisciplinary Framework for SLA in a Multilingual World. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 19–47. doi:10.1111/modl.12301

Tomlinson, M. (2017). Introduction: Imagining the monologic. In Matt Tomlinson & Julian Millie (eds.), The Monologic Imagination (pp. 1–18), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wagner, J. (2018). Multilingual and multimodal interactions. Applied Linguistics, 39 (1), 99–107.

Wang, D. (2019). Translanguaging in Chinese foreign language classrooms: Students and teachers’ attitudes and practices. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 22 (2), 138–149

Wei, L. (2022). Translanguaging as a political stance: Implications for English language education. ELT Journal, 76(2), 172-182. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccab083

Williams, C. (1994). Arfarniad o ddulliau dysgu ac addysgu yng nghyd-destun addysg uwchradd ddwyieithog [An evaluation of teaching and learning methods in the context of bilingual secondary education] (unpublished PhD thesis). University of Wales, Bangor, UK.

Won-Lee, J. (2016). Beyond translingual writing. College English, 79(2), 174–195.

Yolanda, I. Y. N., Setyaningsih, E., & Drajati, N. A. (2024). Translanguaging in academic writing classroom: A case study of pre-service teachers’ perception at EFL university Indonesia. JEELS, 11(1), 277-291.

Zein, S., Sukyadi, D., Hamied, F., & Lengkanawati, N. (2020). English language education in Indonesia: A review of research (2011–2019). Language Teaching, 53(4), 491–523. doi:10.1017/S0261444820000208

Downloads

Published

30-06-2025

How to Cite

Winardi, Y. K., Fadilah, E., & Kurniawan, Y. (2025). Ambivalent Stances of Translanguaging Pedagogy in Indonesia: A Nexus Case Study. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 12(2), 667–696. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v12i2.5121