AI-enhanced problem-based learning framework: Integrating ChatGPT as adaptive scaffolding to advance critical thinking and personalized learning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v13i2.7039Keywords:
problem-based learning, ChatGPT, adaptive scaffolding, critical thinking, personalized learningAbstract
As educational institutions increasingly adopt artificial intelligence technologies, understanding how generative AI can be integrated into student-centered pedagogical frameworks has become an important area of contemporary educational research. This study examines an AI-Enhanced Problem-Based Learning (AI-PBL) Framework that integrates ChatGPT as adaptive scaffolding to improve critical thinking and support personalized learning. Using an explanatory sequential mixed-methods design, the study involved 120 eighth-grade students from four junior high schools in Ujung Pandang District, Makassar City, Indonesia. Quantitative data were collected through pre- and post-tests of critical thinking, while qualitative data came from classroom observations, ChatGPT interaction logs, and interviews. The overall critical thinking score increased from 60.3 (SD = 9.7) to 73.5 (SD = 10.4), t(119) = 9.64, p < .001, d = 1.00, with notable gains in analysis, inference, and bias detection. Qualitative analysis showed four patterns: ChatGPT supported idea exploration, strengthened verification habits, enhanced reflection and metacognitive monitoring, and did not lead to passive dependence. These findings indicate that generative AI can function as a learning partner when it is embedded in structured PBL and guided by teachers. The study offers practical evidence for integrating ChatGPT in secondary classrooms without reducing student agency.
Downloads
References
Abbas, M., Jam, F. A., & Khan, T. I. (2024). Is it harmful or helpful? Examining the causes and consequences of generative AI usage among university students. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21, 19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00444-7
Baig, M. I., et al. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 29, 5875–5899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12345
Barrows, H. S. (1996). Problem-based learning in medicine and beyond: A brief overview. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 68, 3–12.
Blahopoulou, J. & Ortiz-Bonnin, S. Student perceptions of ChatGPT: benefits, costs, and attitudinal differences between users and non-users toward AI integration in higher education. Educ Inf Technol 30, 19741–19764 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-025-13575-9
Blundell, C. N., Mukherjee, M., & Nykvist, S. (2022). A scoping review of the application of the SAMR model in research. Computers & Education Open, 3, 100093. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100093
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Celik, I., Dindar, M., Muukkonen, H., & Järvelä, S. (2022). The promises and challenges of artificial intelligence for teachers: A systematic review of research. TechTrends, 66(4), 616–630. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00734-3
Cottrell, S. (2017). Critical thinking skills: Developing effective analysis and argument (3rd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.
Costa, C., Husain-Habib, N., & Reiter, A. (2025). Integrating AI into education: Successful strategies, ideas, and tools from psychology instructors. Teaching of Psychology, 52(3), 330–338. https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283241297635
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2023). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (6th ed.). Sage Publications.
Divito, C. B., Katchikian, B. M., Gruenwald, J. E., & Burgoon, J. M. (2024). The tools of the future are the challenges of today: The use of ChatGPT in problem-based learning medical education. Medical Teacher, 46(3), 320–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2308841
Ennis, R. H. (2011). The nature of critical thinking: An outline of critical thinking dispositions and abilities. University of Illinois.
Essel, H. B., Vlachopoulos, D., Essuman, A. B., & Amankwa, J. O. (2024). ChatGPT effects on cognitive skills of undergraduate students: Receiving instant responses from AI-based conversational large language models (LLMs). Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100198
Facione, P. A. (1990). Critical thinking: A statement of expert consensus for purposes of educational assessment and instruction (The Delphi Report). California Academic Press.
Garrison, D. R. (2022). Theoretical foundations and epistemological insights of the community of inquiry. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(3), 359–371. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-2110-7.ch001
Guo, Y., & Lee, D. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT for enhancing critical thinking skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(12), 4876–4883. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00505
Heung, Y. M. E., & Chiu, T. K. F. (2025). How ChatGPT impacts student engagement from a systematic review and meta-analysis study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, Article 100361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2025.100361
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16, 235–266. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3
Kasneci, E., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1041608023000195
Larson, B. Z., Moser, C., Caza, A., Muehlfeld, K., & Colombo, L. A. (2024). Critical thinking in the age of generative AI. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 23(3), 373–378. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2024.0338
Mabina, A. (2025). Improving collaboration in higher education through ChatGPT using the ADDIE framework. COMPETITIVE: Journal of Education, 4(1), 81–96. https://competitive.pdfaii.org/index.php/i/article/view/162
Memarian, B., et al. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Methods, potentials, and limitations. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 1(2), 100022. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949882123000221
Munaye, Y. Y., Admass, W., Belayneh, Y., et al. (2025). ChatGPT in education: A systematic review on opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Algorithms, 18(6), 352. https://doi.org/10.3390/a18060352
Nasr, N. R., Tu, C.-H., Werner, J., Bauer, T., Yen, C.-J., & Sujo-Montes, L. (2025). Exploring the impact of generative AI ChatGPT on critical thinking in higher education: Passive AI-directed use or human–AI supported collaboration? Education Sciences, 15(9), Article 1198. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15091198
Olivier, C., & Weilbach, L. (2026). GenAI chatbot tutors as agents of inclusive education: A review guided by ethics of care and critical pedagogy. In Innovative technologies and learning: 8th International Conference, ICITL 2025, Oslo, Norway, August 5–7, 2025, Proceedings, Part I (pp. 84–93). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-98185-2_10
Ruiz Viruel, S., et al. (2025). The role of artificial intelligence in project-based learning. Education Sciences, 15(2), 150. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15020150
Savery, J. R. (2006). Overview of problem-based learning: Definitions and distinctions. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 1(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1002
Suriano, R., Plebe, A., Acciai, A., & Fabio, R. A. (2025). Student interaction with ChatGPT can promote complex critical thinking skills. Learning and Instruction, 95, Article 102011. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102011
Villan, F., & Dos Santos, R. P. (2023). ChatGPT as co-advisor in scientific initiation: Action research with project-based learning in elementary education. arXiv Preprint, arXiv:2311.14701.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wang, J., & Fan, W. (2025). The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: Insights from a meta-analysis. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12, Article 238. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04787-y
Younis, B. (2025). Exploring in-service teachers’ lived experiences in a professional development program: An AI-TPACK framework approach. Proceedings of the International Conference on New Trends in Teaching and Education, 2(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.33422/ntteconf.v2i1.1232
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education: Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16, 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
Zhou, X., Teng, D., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2024). The mediating role of generative AI self-regulation on students’ critical thinking and problem-solving. Education Sciences, 14(12), Article 1302. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121302
Zhu, G., Fan, X., & Hou, C. (2023). Embrace opportunities and face challenges: Using ChatGPT in undergraduate students’ collaborative interdisciplinary learning. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100298
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
