The struggle of EFL students in thesis writing: Investigating language challenges and the role AI in academic writing assistance

Authors

  • Ninuk Indrayani UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember
  • Febrina Rizky Agustina UIN Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v13i1.7198

Keywords:

Academic writing challenges, AI-assisted writing, EFL writing, thesis writing

Abstract

Thesis writing is a crucial milestone for undergraduates, yet English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners enrolled in the English Language Teaching (ELT) program continue to struggle with academic writing despite nearly four years of English instruction. This study investigates the persistent challenges faced by EFL students in writing their theses, particularly in language-related issues. Additionally, it explores the role of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in assisting students during the thesis writing and revision process. Using a qualitative approach, 7 EFL students from an ELT program were interviewed, and the data were analyzed using thematic analysis to explore their language-related challenges in thesis writing as well as their perceptions and use of AI-assisted writing tools. Findings reveal that the students encountered significant challenges in grammar mastery, academic vocabulary, adherence to academic writing conventions, and L1 interference. These issues often pushed students to rely heavily on AI tools such as for paraphrasing, grammar correction, translation, and academic adjustment. While there were benefits, the students also reported drawbacks, for example, technical limitations, stylistic mismatches, misalignment, and reduced independence in writing. Whereas AI improved the surface quality of student writing, it simultaneously undermined authenticity and critical engagement, particularly when EFL students relied on AI for paraphrasing, translation, and expanding literature review sections. The findings highlight the urgent need for embedded-AI literacy integration into ELT curricula to equip students with the skills required to navigate technological assistance in developing independent, critical, and authentic writing competence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alkhasanah, A. N., & Kholis, N. (2024). Breaking through undergraduate thesis writing barriers: Insights from Indonesian EFL students. Erudita: Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.28918/erudita.v4i2.8899

Alm, A. (2024). Exploring autonomy in the AI w¬ilderness: Learner challenges and choices. Education Sciences, 14(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121369

Almashy, A., Saleh, A., Ahmed, A. S. M. M., Jamshed, M., Ansari, M. S., Banu, S., & Warda, W. U. (2024). Analyzing the impact of CALL tools on English learners’ writing skills: A comparative study of errors correction. World Journal of English Language, 14(6), 657–667. https://doi.org/10.5430/wjel.v14n6p657.

Apriani, E., Cardoso, L., & Obaid, A. J. (2024). Impact of AI-powered chatBots on EFL students’ writing skills, self-efficacy, and self-regulation : A mixed-methods study. Global Education Research Review, 1(2), 57–72. https://doi.org/10.71380/GERR-08-2024-8

Biglari, N., & Struys, E. (2021). Native language interference in English L2 word recognition and word integration skills. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 11(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1101.01

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148

Crosthwaite, P., & Baisa, V. (2023). Generative AI and the end of corpus-assisted data-driven learning? Not so fast! Applied Corpus Linguistics, 3(3), 100066. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acorp.2023.100066

Fitria, T. N. (2022). Analysis of EFL students’ difficulties in writing and completing English thesis. LLT Journal: Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 25(1), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v25i1.3607

Grabe, W., & Kaplan, L. B. (2014). Theory and practice of writing. Routledge.

Harmer, J. (2001). The practice of English language teaching (3rd ed.). Longman.

Hawanti, S., & Zubaydulloevna, K.M. (2023). AI chatbot-based learning: Alleviating students’ anxiety in English writing classroom. Bulletin of Social Informatics Theory and Application, 7(2), 182–192. https://doi.org/10.31763/businta.v7i2.659

Hyland, K. (2003). Second language writing. Cambridge University Press.

Hyland, K. (2004). Disciplinary discourses: Social interactions in academic writing. The University of Michigan Press.

Ismail, R., & Assidiq, I. (2024). Academic writing acceleration: Investigating the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) applications on academic writing efficiency. Proceedings Series on Proceedings of Multidisiplinary Sciences, 1(1), 256.

Kelderak, S. (2023). Academic reading challenges and coping strategies: A mixed-methods study of Indonesian EFL undergraduate students. HUELE: Journal of Applied Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 3(2), 89–99. https://doi.org/10.30598/huele.v3.i2.p89-99

Lesmana, N., & Ariffin, K. (2020). Problems in writing scholarly articles in English among Indonesian EFL post-graduate students. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 9(4), 12–24. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v9-i4/8174

Li, S. (2025). Generative AI and second language writing. Digital Studies in Language and Literature, 2(November 2022), 122–152. https://doi.org/10.1515/dsll-2025-0007

Mahapatra, S. (2023). Impact of ChatGPT on ESL students’ academic writing skills: A mixed methods intervention study. Smart Learning Environments, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-024-00295-9

Mirzayev, E. (2024). The influence of first language interference on ESL writing skills. EuroGlobal Journal of Linguistics and Language Education, 1(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.69760/ds5gc908

Mustakim, N. M. J., & Umiyati, J. (2025). Challenges in grammar learning among EFL students: A case study of an Indonesian university. Scope of English Language Teaching, Literature and Linguistics, 8(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.46918/seltics.v8i1.2598

Nugraheni, D. A., & Basya, D. (2018). Exploring EFL students’ writing difficulties: From dimensions to errors. Jurnal Educazione : Jurnal Pendidikan, Pembelajaran Dan Bimbingan Dan Konseling, 6(2), 51–59. https://ejurnal.uij.ac.id/index.php/EDU/article/view/573

Odlin, T. (1989). Language transfer: Cross-linguistic influence in language learning. In J. C. H. Long, Michael; Richards (Ed.), The Cambridge Applied Linguistics Series. Cambridge University Press.

Ortiz-Bonnin, S., & Blahopoulou, J. (2025). Chat or cheat? Academic dishonesty, risk perceptions, and ChatGPT usage in higher education students. Social Psychology of Education, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-025-10080-2

Salayo, J., Gatcho, A. R., & Titar-Improgo, C. M. (2024). L1 as a tool for dialogic discourse in an ESL classroom during pre-writing stage. Recoletos Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.32871/rmrj2412.01.09

Samad, I. A., Fitriani, S. S., Yusuf, Y. Q., & Ys, S. B. (2024). Scaffold the writing of argumentative texts to undergraduate students through genre-based pedagogy. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 17(2), 196-222. https://doi.org/10.70730/CPXF6531

Tsuji, K. (2021). Effects of L1 use on L2 text quality: Rethinking cognitive process of formulating L1 texts during L2 writing. English Language Teaching, 14(7), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v14n7p44

Wang, H., & Dang, A. N. (2024). Enhancing L2 writing with generative AI: A systematic review of pedagogical integration and outcomes. Preprint (October). https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.19572.16005

Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge University Press.

Zhang, M., & Crosthwaite, P. (2025). More human than human? Differences in lexis and collocation within academic essays produced by ChatGPT-3.5 and human L2 writers. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral-2024-0196

Downloads

Published

24-05-2026

How to Cite

Indrayani, N., & Agustina, F. R. (2026). The struggle of EFL students in thesis writing: Investigating language challenges and the role AI in academic writing assistance. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 13(1), 455–484. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v13i1.7198