EFL students’ beliefs about AI-assisted writing and its perceived impact on their English writing development

Authors

  • Rika Riwayatiningsih Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri
  • Raveenthiran Vivekanantharasa Secondary and Tertiary Education, faculty of Education, Open University, Sri Lanka
  • Entika Fani Prastikawati English Education Department, Faculty of Teacher Training and Education, PGRI Semarang University, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v13i1.7343

Keywords:

AI literacy, EFL academic writing, ethical awareness, Generative AI tools

Abstract

Recent advancements in AI have provided new chances to support EFL writing. This study investigated the perceptions of Indonesian EFL students regarding AI-assisted writing tools and their perceived impact on English writing development. An explanatory sequential mixed-methods design was employed. A survey and asynchronous written semi-structured interviews examined students’ beliefs and perceptions regarding ChatGPT and Grammarly, the perceived impact of these tools on essential writing sub-skills, and their ethical and autonomy-related concerns within academic settings. Quantitative results showed predominantly positive perceptions, with students reporting perceived benefits for idea generation, coherence, grammatical accuracy, vocabulary choice, and overall textual clarity. Grammarly was acknowledged for improving error awareness and linguistic accuracy, whereas ChatGPT facilitated brainstorming and paragraph structuring. Interview accounts indicated cautious and critical engagement, as students reported evaluating AI suggestions rather than adopting outputs uncritically. Students also expressed concerns about misinformation, academic integrity, and the possibility of reduced confidence or independence under excessive reliance on AI-assisted feedback. Within this sample and context, findings suggest that AI-assisted writing tools may support EFL learners’ writing processes when used thoughtfully, but effective integration requires guidance that promotes ethical awareness, verification practices, and sustained writing autonomy. Future research should triangulate perceptions with  performance-based writing outcomes (e.g., rubric-scored pre–post writing tasks) and usage evidence to examine longer-term development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ait Baha, T., El Hajji, M., Es-Saady, Y., & Fadili, H. (2024). The impact of educational chatbot on student learning experience. Education and Information Technologies, 29(8), 10153–10176. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10639-023-12166-W

Akinsemolu, A. A., & Onyeaka, H. (2025). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Transforming Language Learning: Opportunities and Ethical Considerations. In Journal of Language and Education (Vol. 11, Issue 1, pp. 148–152). National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE University). https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2025.22118

Apriani, E., Hamidah Daulay, S., Aprilia, F., Gafur Marzuki, A., Warsah, I., Supardan, D., & Muthmainnah. (2025). A Mixed-Method Study on the Effectiveness of Using ChatGPT in Academic Writing and Students’ Perceived Experiences. Journal of Language and Education, 11(1), 26–45. https://doi.org/10.17323/jle.2025.17913

Baig, M. I., Yadegaridehkordi, E., Shyu, M.-L., & others. (2024). ChatGPT in higher education: A systematic literature review. Computers & Education.

Barrot, J. S. (2023). Using ChatGPT for second language writing: Pitfalls and potentials. Assessing Writing, 57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2023.100745

Barrot, J. S., & Agdeppa, J. Y. (2021). Complexity, accuracy, and fluency as indices of college-level L2 writers’ proficiency. Assessing Writing, 47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2020.100510

Bittle, K., & El-Gayar, O. (2025). Generative AI and academic integrity in higher education: A systematic review and research agenda. Information, 16(4), 296. https://doi.org/10.3390/info16040296

Borg, M. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs. ELT Journal, 55(2), 186–188. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/55.2.186

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: Enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2023). Co-constructing knowledge with generative AI tools: Reflections from a CSCL perspective. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 18(4), 607–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11412-023-09409-w

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

Deng, X., & Yu, Z. (2023). A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review of the Effect of Chatbot Technology Use in Sustainable Education. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/SU15042940

Elbadiansyah, Sain, Z. H., Shehu Lawal, U., Chansa Thelma, C., & Luqman Aziz, A. (2024). Exploring the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Enhancing Student Motivation and Cognitive Development in Higher Education. TechComp Innovations: Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 1(2), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.70063/techcompinnovations.v1i2.47

Elkhatat, A. M., Elsaid, K., & Almeer, S. (2023). Evaluating the authenticity of ChatGPT responses: A study on academic integrity concerns in higher education. AI and Ethics.

Fauziah, F., Diana, N., Putri, S., & Fadhli, T. (2025). Students engagement with Artificial Intelligence (AI) Chatbot in English language learning: Theory of planned behavior perspective. JEELS, 12(2), 585-614.DOI: 10.30762/jeels. v12i2.4085

Feuerriegel, S., Hartmann, J., Janiesch, C., & Zschech, P. (2024). Generative AI. Business and Information Systems Engineering, 66(1), 111–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12599-023-00834-7

Fu, Y., et al. (2024). Navigating the ethical terrain of AI in education. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence.

Garcia Castro, R. A., Mayta Cachicatari, N. A., Bartesaghi Aste, W. M., & Llapa Medina, M. P. (2024). Exploration of ChatGPT in basic education: Advantages, disadvantages, and its impact on school tasks. Contemporary Educational Technology, 16(3), ep511. https://doi.org/10.30935/CEDTECH/14615

García-López, I. M., González González, C. S., Ramírez-Montoya, M.-S., & Molina-Espinosa, J.-M. (2025). Challenges of implementing ChatGPT on education: Systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 8, 100401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100401

Graham, S., Kiuhara, S. A., & MacKay, M. (2020). The effects of writing on learning in science, social studies, and mathematics: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 179–226. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654320914744

Guo, Y., & Lee, D. (2023). Leveraging ChatGPT for Enhancing Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Chemical Education, 100(12), 4876–4883. https://doi.org/10.1021/ACS.JCHEMED.3C00505

Hamdani, M. H., & Abid, N. (2025). Indonesian EFL students’ writing challenges: A qualitative meta-analysis. Getsempena English Education Journal, 12(1), 14–36. https://doi.org/10.46244/geej.v12i1.3091

Hassan Osman, O., Hamed Al Rahbi, A., Binayan, C., & Abuoaf, M. (2025). EFL Students’ Academic Writing Challenges at the Foundation Programme in the University of Nizwa: Challenges and Remedy. Arab World English Journal, 16(1), 267–284. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol16no1.16

Hsu, T. C. (2017). Learning English with Augmented Reality: Do learning styles matter? Computers and Education, 106, 137–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.007

Hwang, G. J., & Chang, C. Y. (2023). A review of opportunities and challenges of chatbots in education. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 4099–4112. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1952615

I Nyoman Suparsa, Ida Bagus Nyoman Mantra, Ni Luh Sukanadi, I Nyoman Adi Susrawan, & I Nyoman Suwandi. (2023). A comprehensive study on students’ essay writing skills. International Journal of Social Science, 2(6), 2429–2434. https://doi.org/10.53625/ijss.v2i6.5542

Kamarullah, K., Sarinauli, B., & Syahmidi, H. (2024). AI writing tools in the classroom: investigating usage, challenges, and adaptations by rural english teachers. Premise: Journal of English Education, 13(3), 1018. https://doi.org/10.24127/pj.v13i3.10914

Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., … Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274

Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for Language Teaching and Learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868

Lai, C. (2019). Learning beliefs and autonomous language learning with technology beyond the classroom. Language Awareness, 28(4), 291–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2019.1675679

Leunard, H., Rachmawati, R., Zani, B. N., & Maharjan, K. (2023). GPT Chat: Opportunities and Challenges in the Learning Process of Arabic Language in Higher Education. Journal International of Lingua and Technology, 2(1), 10–22. https://doi.org/10.55849/JILTECH.V2I1.439

Lismay, L. (2020). Logical fallacies on students’ argumentative writing. ELP (Journal of English Language Pedagogy), 5(2), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.36665/ELP.V5I2.321

Malik, A. R., Pratiwi, Y., Andajani, K., Numertayasa, I. W., Suharti, S., Darwis, A., & Marzuki. (2023). Exploring Artificial Intelligence in Academic Essay: Higher Education Student’s Perspective. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 5, 100296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100296

Okonkwo, C. W., & Ade-Ibijola, A. (2021). Chatbots applications in education: A systematic review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100033

Pérez, J. Q., Daradoumis, T., & Puig, J. M. M. (2020). Rediscovering the use of chatbots in education: A systematic literature review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 28(6), 1549–1565. https://doi.org/10.1002/CAE.22326

Putra, F. W., Rangka, I. B., Aminah, S., & Aditama, M. H. R. (2023). ChatGPT in the higher education environment: Perspectives from the theory of high order thinking skills. Journal of Public Health (United Kingdom), 45(4), e840–e841. https://doi.org/10.1093/PUBMED/FDAD120

Qadhi, S. M., Alduais, A., Chaaban, Y., & Khraisheh, M. (2024). Generative AI, Research Ethics, and Higher Education Research: Insights from a Scientometric Analysis. Information (Switzerland), 15(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/INFO15060325

Rahman, M. M., & Watanobe, Y. (2023). ChatGPT for Education and Research: Opportunities, Threats, and Strategies. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/APP13095783

Ranalli, J. (2021). L2 student engagement with automated feedback on writing: Potential for learning and issues of trust. System, 99, 102508.

Rebolledo Font de la Vall, R., & González Araya, F. (2023). Exploring the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Language Learning Tools. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention, 10(01), 7569–7576. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v10i01.02

Rezaev, A. V., & Tregubova, N. D. (2023). ChatGPT and AI in the Universities: An Introduction to the Near Future. Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii, 32(6), 19–37. https://doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2023-32-6-19-37

Romero-Rodríguez, J. M., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Buenestado-Fernández, M., & Lara-Lara, F. (2023). Use of ChatGPT at University as a Tool for Complex Thinking: Students’ Perceived Usefulness. Journal of New Approaches in Educational Research, 12(2), 323–339. https://doi.org/10.7821/NAER.2023.7.1458

Roxana Rebolledo Font de la Vall, and Fabian Gonzalez Araya. 2023. “Exploring the Benefits and Challenges of AI-Language Learning Tools.” The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention 10 (1): 7569–7576. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsshi/v10i01.02

Sanjay, M., Vikas, S., & Prashant, D. (2023). ChatGPT: Optimizing text generation model for knowledge creation. I-Manager’s Journal on Software Engineering, 17(3), 21. https://doi.org/10.26634/JSE.17.3.19469

Saúde, S., Barros, J. P., & Almeida, I. (2024). Impacts of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Higher Education: Research Trends and Students’ Perceptions. Social Sciences, 13(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/SOCSCI13080410

Shahriar, A., & Laboni, F. B. (2023). Potential Success in English Writing Skills Using Artificial Intelligence “Grammarly.” DIU Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 10(1), 57–75. https://doi.org/10.36481/diujhss.v10idw4ecj03

Song, C., & Song, Y. (2023). Enhancing academic writing skills and motivation: assessing the efficacy of ChatGPT in AI-assisted language learning for EFL students. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1260843

Suharyat, Y., & Lusiana, L. (2023). The Investigation of Students’ Writing Skills in Learning English as a Second Language in Indonesia. European Journal of English Language Studies, 3(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejels.3.1.47

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285.

Teng, M. F. (2024). “ChatGPT is the companion, not enemies”: EFL learners’ perceptions and experiences in using ChatGPT for feedback in writing. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100270

Toba, R., Noor, W. N., & Sanu, L. O. (2019). The Current Issues of Indonesian EFL Students’ Writing Skills: Ability, Problem, and Reason in Writing Comparison and Contrast Essay. Dinamika Ilmu, 57–73. https://doi.org/10.21093/di.v19i1.1506

UNESCO. (2023). Guidance for generative AI in education and research. UNESCO.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wang, P.-Y. (2013). Examining the Digital Divide between Rural and Urban Schools: Technology Availability, Teachers’ Integration Level and Students’ Perception. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v2n2p127

Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37.

Wood, D., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17(2), 89–100.

Yao & Fan (2025) – pengembangan Cognitive Load Scale for AI-assisted L2 Writing (instrumen spesifik untuk beban kognitif pada human–AI writing).

Yunita, R., Fitrianna, N., & Maulana, N. I. (2025). Artificial Intelligence in English Writing: Ethical Integration and Lecturers’ Perspectives. JEELS, 12(2), 641- 666.DOI:10.30762/jeels.v12i2.5250

Zhai, X. (2023). ChatGPT User Experience: Implications for Education. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1-18. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.4312418

Zhang, R. (2024). Application of “Artificial Intelligence + Education” Innovation Model in Higher Education Management and Student Training. Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.2478/amns-2024-1027

Zhao, R., Yunus, M. M., & M. Rafiq, K. R. (2023). The Impact of the Use of ChatGPT in Enhancing Students’ Engagement and Learning Outcomes in Higher Education: A Review. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(12). https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v13-i12/20258

Downloads

Published

22-05-2026

How to Cite

Riwayatiningsih, R., Vivekanantharasa, R., & Prastikawati, E. F. (2026). EFL students’ beliefs about AI-assisted writing and its perceived impact on their English writing development. JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies), 13(1), 363–388. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v13i1.7343