Exploring EFL students’ perceptions of AI integrations through the brain-to-brainware lens
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v13i2.8641Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence (AI), brainware, EFL learning, Islamic university, student perceptionsAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) has become increasingly integrated into English language learning. However, students’ perceptions particularly in Islamic university on the AI's pedagogical and ethical implications need further elaboration. This study addresses EFL students' perceptions of the use of artificial intelligence in a state Islamic university in Manado, Indonesia through the conceptual lens of brain-to-brainware, which refers to the shift from independent human cognition to AI-supported learning processes. Using a convergent mixed-methods design, data were collected through an online questionnaire containing closed and open-ended items. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative responses were identified thematically. The findings indicate that students perceived AI as a practical and flexible learning support, particularly for understanding difficult material, writing and editing, translation, vocabulary development, and speaking practice. However, their acceptance was conditional because the students also reported concerns about inaccurate outputs, shallow explanations, technical barriers, overdependence, reduced critical engagement, and ethical misuse. The ethical and pedagogical dimension received the strongest endorsement, indicating students’ perceived need for responsible use, output verification, lecturer guidance, and clear institutional policies. Thus, this study extends current discussion on AI in English learning context by interpreting students' perceptions as a shift toward AI-assisted learning within the brain-to-brainware framework.
Downloads
References
Alkharusi, H. (2022). A descriptive analysis and interpretation of data from Likert scales in educational and psychological research. Indian Journal of Psychology & Education, 12(2), 13–16. https://www.ijpe.co.in/index.php/ijpe/article/view/101
Al-khresheh, M. H. (2024). The future of artificial intelligence in English language teaching: Pros and cons of ChatGPT implementation through a systematic review. Language Teaching Research Quarterly, 43, 54–80. https://doi.org/10.32038/ltrq.2024.43.04
Butarbutar, R. (2024). Artificial intelligence for language learning and teaching: A narrative literature study. Englisia: Journal of Language, Education, and Humanities, 12(1), 147–163. https://doi.org/10.22373/ej.v12i1.23211
Chan, C. K. Y. (2025). Students’ perceptions of ‘AI-giarism’: investigating changes in understandings of academic misconduct. Education and Information Technologies, 30(6), 8087–8108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13151-7
Chen, Z., Wei, W., Zhu, X., & Yao, Y. (2026). Unpacking the rejection of L2 students toward ChatGPT-generated feedback: An explanatory research. ECNU Review of Education, 9(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311241305140
Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613
Cotton, D. R. E., Cotton, P. A., & Shipway, J. R. (2024). Chatting and cheating: Ensuring academic integrity in the era of ChatGPT. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(2), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. SAGE.
Crompton, H., & Burke, D. (2023). Artificial intelligence in higher education: The state of the field. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00392-8
Dewi, U. (2022). Grammarly as automated writing evaluation: Its effectiveness from EFL students’ perceptions. Lingua Cultura, 16(2), 155–161. https://doi.org/10.21512/lc.v16i2.8315
Faizin, N., Alfan, M., & Basid, A. (2025). Muslim students’ acceptance of artificial intelligence in Islamic religious education: An extended TAM approach. Discover Education, 4, 304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00767-1
Fetters, M. D., Curry, L. A., & Creswell, J. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—Principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6 Pt 2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
Godwin-Jones, R. (2022). Partnering with AI: Intelligent writing assistance and instructed language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 26(2), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/73474
Hamid, S. M., Mannong, A. B. M., Saiful, S., & Irawan, N. (2025). Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into EFL in Higher Education: Challenges and Opportunities for Indonesian Teachers and Students. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i3.7717
Huh, E.-N., & Hossain, M. I. (2021). Brainware computing: Concepts, scopes and challenges. Applied Sciences, 11(11), Article 5303. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11115303
Karatay, Y., & Karatay, L. (2024). Automated writing evaluation use in second language classrooms: A research synthesis. System, 123, 103332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103332
Karolina, V., Querioz, C., Xaixanith, T., & Farhan, F. I. (2025). Indonesian EFL Learners Responses to Using ChatGPT: An Analysis Based on The TAM Model. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 9(2), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v9i2.91799
Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Gasser, U., Groh, G., Günnemann, S., Hüllermeier, E., Krusche, S., Kutyniok, G., Michaeli, T., Nerdel, C., Pfeffer, J., Poquet, O., Sailer, M., Schmidt, A., Seidel, T., & Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Kohnke, L., Moorhouse, B. L., & Zou, D. (2023). ChatGPT for language teaching and learning. RELC Journal, 54(2), 537–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/00336882231162868
Laili, R. N., Wirawati, W. A., & Nashir, M. (2025). Student’s Perception on the Use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) ChatGPT in English Language Learning: Benefits and Challenges in Higher Education. Edu Cendikia: Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan, 4(03), 1389–1403. https://doi.org/10.47709/educendikia.v4i03.5272
Li, B., Lowell, V. L., Wang, C., & Li, X. (2024). A systematic review of the first year of publications on ChatGPT and language education: Examining research on ChatGPT’s use in language learning and teaching. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100266
Liando, N. V. F., Tatipang, D. P., Rorimpandey, R., & Iskandar, I. (2025). AI-powered language learning: A blessing or a curse for English language education? Studies in English Language and Education, 12(1), 301–311. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i1.34842
Loeb, S., Dynarski, S., McFarland, D., Morris, P., Reardon, S., & Reber, S. (2017). Descriptive analysis in education: A guide for researchers (NCEE 2017-4023). U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/pubs/20174023/
Megawati, S., Alfarizi, M., & Wahyuni, J. (2025). Artificial intelligence revolution in Indonesian Islamic higher education: How it affects students’ self-efficacy, creativity, and learning performance. Journal of Educators Online, 22(4). https://doi.org/10.9743/JEO.2025.22.4.11
Moseholm, E., & Fetters, M. D. (2017). Conceptual models to guide integration during analysis in convergent mixed methods studies. Methodological Innovations, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799117703118
Nabilah Rahman, Elsa Natasya, Andi Dio Nurul Awalia, Muh. Yusril Anam, & Della Fadhilatunisa. (2025). Digital Ethics and Learning Autonomy in Artificial Intelligence in Education: The Mediating Role of Trust in AI. Journal of Vocational, Informatics and Computer Education, 78–90. https://doi.org/10.66053/voice.v3i2.262
Slamet, J. (2024). Potential of ChatGPT as a digital language learning assistant: EFL teachers’ and students’ perceptions. Discover Artificial Intelligence, 4(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-024-00143-2
Suhono. (2023). An Assistance of Islamic University EFL Students through Artificial Intelligence (AI) Machine Translation and Writing Tools. International Journal of Community Engagement Payungi, 3(2), 74–90. https://doi.org/10.58879/ijcep.v3i2.36
Suryani, Y., Nirwanto, R., & Qamariah, Z. (2025). The EFL Students’ Perceptions of AI Writing Tools in Academic Writing Skills at Islamic University of Palangka Raya. Journal of English Language and Education, 10(6), 223–234. https://doi.org/10.31004/jele.v10i6.1566
Syukur, F., Maghfurin, A., Marhamah, U., & Jehwae, P. (2024). Integration of Artificial Intelligence in Islamic Higher Education: Comparative Responses between Indonesia and Thailand. Nazhruna: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(3), 531–553. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v7i3.13
Van Horn, K. R. (2024). ChatGPT in English language learning: Exploring perceptions and promoting autonomy in a university EFL context. TESL-EJ, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.28109a8
Yang, L., & Li, R. (2024). ChatGPT for L2 learning: Current status and implications. System, 124, 103351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2024.103351
Zaim, M., Arsyad, S., Waluyo, B., Ardi, H., Al Hafizh, Muhd., Zakiyah, M., Syafitri, W., Nusi, A., & Hardiah, M. (2024). AI-powered EFL pedagogy: Integrating generative AI into university teaching preparation through UTAUT and activity theory. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100335
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 JEELS (Journal of English Education and Linguistics Studies)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.








