Differentiated instruction supporting deep learning among junior high teachers in the Nusantara Capital City

Authors

  • Abdul Razak Mathematics Education Study Program, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia; Tadris Mathematics Study Program, Universitas Islam Negeri Sultan Aji Muhammad Idris Samarinda, East Kalimantan, Indonesia
  • Agus Maman Abadi Mathematics Education Study Program, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Wahyu Setyaningrum Mathematics Education Study Program, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia
  • Heri Retnawati Mathematics Education Study Program, Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta, Special Region of Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.30762/f_m.v9i1.8735

Keywords:

Differentiated Instruction, Deep Learning, Phenomenology, Nusantara Capital City (IKN)

Abstract

The development of the Nusantara Capital City (IKN) has triggered social and educational transformation in East Kalimantan, requiring teachers to implement adaptive, contextual, and learner-centered instruction. Differentiated instruction allows teachers to adapt content, processes, and products based on students’ readiness, interests, and learning profiles. Consistent with Universal Design for Learning, these adjustments promote active learning and deeper conceptual understanding. Therefore, differentiated instruction is viewed as an approach that supports deep learning, emphasizing meaningful understanding, critical thinking, knowledge transfer, and reflection. This study explored junior high school teachers’ lived experiences and interpretations of implementing differentiated instruction to support deep learning in the IKN buffer areas of East Kalimantan. Using a qualitative phenomenological design, the study was conducted in junior high schools in Samarinda, Balikpapan, and Penajam Paser Utara. Fourteen teachers who were implementing the Merdeka Curriculum and differentiated instruction were selected through purposive sampling. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation, and analyzed using Colaizzi’s phenomenological method. The findings identified three main themes: (1) pedagogical adaptation through adjustments to content, processes, and products; (2) contextualization of deep learning through integrating IKN-related issues into meaningful mathematics learning; and (3) implementation challenges, including limited facilities, administrative burdens, diverse student abilities, and teacher competency development. The findings suggest that differentiated instruction supports deep learning by aligning instruction with students’ readiness and authentic learning contexts. This study contributes to the literature by connecting differentiated instruction, deep learning, and IKN-based contextual mathematics learning, while providing practical insights for teachers and schools to design inclusive, meaningful learning environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ananiadou, K., & Claro, M. (2009). 21st century skills and competences for new millennium learners in OECD countries (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 41). OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/218525261154

Ardenlid, F., Lundqvist, J., & Sund, L. (2025). A scoping review and thematic analysis of differentiated instruction practices: How teachers foster inclusive classrooms for all students, including gifted students. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 100439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2025.100439

Chen, J., & Singh, C. K. S. (2024). A systematic review on deep learning in education: Concepts, factors, models, and measurements. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 7(1), 125–129. https://doi.org/10.54097/gzk2yd38

Colaizzi, P. F. (1978). Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. In R. Valle & M. King (Eds.), Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology (pp. 48–71). Oxford University Press.

Coubergs, C., Struyven, K., Vanthournout, G., & Engels, N. (2017). Measuring teachers' perceptions about differentiated instruction: The DI-quest instrument and model. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 53, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2017.02.004

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Hartiningrum, E. S. N., Agustin, N. Y., & Umami, R. (2023). Elementary students' mathematics learning activities and outcomes through the application of the problem solving method. Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M), 6(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.30762/f_m.v6i2.1958

Hattie, J. (2023). Visible learning: The sequel. Routledge.

Kereluik, K., Mishra, P., Fahnoe, C., & Terry, L. (2013). What knowledge is of most worth: Teacher knowledge for 21st century learning. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 29(4), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2013.10784716

Kovač, V. B., Nome, D. Ø., Jensen, A. R., & Skreland, L. L. (2025). The why, what, and how of deep learning: Critical analysis and additional concerns. Education Inquiry, 16(2), 237–253. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2023.2194502

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Lindner, K.-T., & Schwab, S. (2025). Differentiation and individualisation in inclusive education: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(14), 1463–1482. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1813450

McPhail, G. (2020). The search for deep learning: A curriculum coherence model. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 52(5), 623–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2020.1748231

Melesse, T., & Belay, S. (2022). Differentiating instruction in primary and middle schools: Does variation in students' learning attributes matter? Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2105552

Meutstege, K., Geel, V. M., & Visscher, A. J. (2023). Evidence-based design of a teacher professional development program for differentiated instruction: A whole-task approach. Education Sciences, 13(10), Article 985. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13100985

Mishiwo, M. (2025). An evaluation of pre-service teachers' practical experience in teaching mathematics. Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M), 8(2), 288–304. https://doi.org/10.30762/f_m.v8i2.6602

Mystakidis, S. (2021). Deep meaningful learning. Encyclopedia, 1(3), 988–997. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia1030075

Neubauer, B. E., Witkop, C. T., & Varpio, L. (2019). How phenomenology can help us learn from the experiences of others. Perspectives on Medical Education, 8(2), 90–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40037-019-0509-2

Nicolae, M. (2014). Teachers' beliefs as the differentiated instruction starting point: Research basis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 128, 426–431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.182

OECD. (2021). OECD future of education and skills 2030: OECD learning compass 2030. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Pozas, M., Letzel, V., Lindner, K.-T., & Schwab, S. (2021). DI (differentiated instruction) does matter! The effects of DI on secondary school students' well-being, social inclusion, and academic self-concept. Frontiers in Education, 6, Article 729027. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.729027

Pozas, M., Letzel, V., & Schneider, C. (2020). Teachers and differentiated instruction: Exploring differentiation practices to address student diversity. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 20(3), 217–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-3802.12481

Putriani, D., Putra, R. D. A. P., Anjani, K., & Sari, Y. M. (2025). Cognitive assessment development: Item analysis with classical and modern theories. Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M), 8(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.30762/f_m.v8i1.2668

Razak, A., & Rumainur. (2025). Differentiated learning in the independent curriculum to enhance mathematical connection and resilience of state junior high school students in East Kalimantan Province. Absis: Mathematics Education Journal, 7(2), 100–107. https://doi.org/10.32585/absis.v7i2.7630

Smale-Jacobse, A. E., Meijer, A., Helms-Lorenz, M., & Maulana, R. (2019). Differentiated instruction in secondary education: A systematic review of research evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 2366. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02366

Stollman, S., Meirink, J., Westenberg, M., & van Driel, J. (2021). Teachers' interactive cognitions of differentiated instruction: An exploration in regular and talent development lessons. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 44(4), 308–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/01623532211001440

Sulistyawati, E., & Radite, R. (2024). Exploring the quality of learning modules developed by preservice mathematics teachers based on the national (Merdeka) curriculum. Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M), 7(1), 156–172. https://doi.org/10.30762/f_m.v7i1.3317

Suparni, S., & Murti, R. C. (2025). The effectiveness of differentiated learning on critical thinking skills and student activeness in mathematics learning. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(3), 5673–5682. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i3.6879

Suprayogi, M. N., Valcke, M., & Godwin, R. (2017). Teachers and their implementation of differentiated instruction in the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 291–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.020

Tomlinson, C. A. (2021). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners (2nd ed.). ASCD.

Ulfa, J., Inganah, S., & Putri, O. R. U. (2025). Students' mathematical communication and collaboration patterns through small group work: A gender case study. Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M), 8(2), 180–200. https://doi.org/10.30762/f_m.v8i2.6067

Valiandes, S., & Neophytou, L. (2018). Teachers' professional development for differentiated instruction in mixed-ability classrooms: Investigating the impact of a development program on teachers' professional learning and on students' achievement. Teacher Development, 22(1), 123–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2017.1338196

Voogt, J., & Roblin, N. P. (2012). A comparative analysis of international frameworks for 21st century competences: Implications for national curriculum policies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 44(3), 299–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2012.668938

Wu, X. Y. (2024). Exploring the effects of digital technology on deep learning: A meta-analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 29(1), 425–458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-12307-1

Downloads

Published

25-06-2026

How to Cite

Razak, A., Abadi, A. M., Setyaningrum, W., & Retnawati, H. (2026). Differentiated instruction supporting deep learning among junior high teachers in the Nusantara Capital City. Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M), 9(1), 111–133. https://doi.org/10.30762/f_m.v9i1.8735

Issue

Section

Articles